Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "log_rul".
Did you mean:
log_rule
2004 Feb 10
22
Re: [Shorewall-newbies] specific log-prefix ... patch
Let''s move this to the Shorewall Development list....
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 03:14 pm, xavier wrote:
> here is a patch to allow this :
> |ACCEPT<10/sec:20>:debug fw lan:$ntp_servers udp 123 - - - - ntp
>
> a problem with the patch is that now the logprefix is mandatory.
> i''m trying to debug it, but i can''t find the flaw.
Also, with
2003 Oct 08
2
Problem with /bin/ash
...tions=$tap0_options
+ options=
+ list_search newnotsyn
+ local e=newnotsyn
+ [ 1 -gt 1 ]
+ return 1
+ run_user_exit newnotsyn
+ find_file newnotsyn
+ [ -n -a -f /newnotsyn ]
+ echo /etc/shorewall/newnotsyn
+ local user_exit=/etc/shorewall/newnotsyn
+ [ -f /etc/shorewall/newnotsyn ]
+ [ -n info ]
+ log_rule info newnotsyn DROP
+ local level=info
+ local chain=newnotsyn
+ local disposition=DROP
+ shift
+ shift
+ shift
+ log_rule_limit info newnotsyn DROP --match limit --limit 1/second \
--limit-burst 60
+ local level=info
+ local chain=newnotsyn
+ local disposition=DROP
+ local rulenum=
+ local limit=...
2013 Aug 31
23
ERROR: Log level INFO requires LOG Target in your kernel and iptables
Hi,
I have 2 Debian testing boxes running a very similar setup (both running
the latest aptosid kernel); on one of them, since the
iptables/libxtables10 packages have been upgraded from 1.4.19.1-1 to
1.4.20-2, shorewall-init can''t start shorewall anymore and for this
reason ifupdown also fails triggering firewall up.
Shorewall can be successfully started later on, and ifupdown starts
2005 Feb 01
4
Shorewall problem
I am getting the following message when Shorewall stops can anybody shed
any light on this message and where I should be looking? Thanks
root@bobshost:~# shorewall stop
Loading /usr/share/shorewall/functions...
Processing /etc/shorewall/params ...
Processing /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf...
Loading Modules...
Stopping Shorewall...Processing /etc/shorewall/stop ...
IP Forwarding Enabled