search for: locs

Excuse me, I forgot the provison section! For all, after I had several problems making samba4 working as it should on centOs5.5 here is a short guide setting it up to work. First of all do not install the bind package coming with centos 5.5!! Install needs for samba yum install libacl* gnutls* readline* python* gdb* autoconf* Named installation: Here is a description on what to do:

Hello I got about 20 different people using 20 different PC''s in my Lan. Five of them should have unrestricted access to the internet any time of the day. Yet the rest of them should only have access at certain timeframes during the day. Two of them should have no access at all. I am well experienced in writing rules (for the rules file) that make all this possible, yet i was

For all, after I had several problems making samba4 working as it should on centOs5.5 here is a short guide setting it up to work. First of all do not install the bind package coming with centos 5.5!! Install needs for samba yum install libacl* gnutls* readline* python* gdb* autoconf* Named installation: Here is a description on what to do:

Dear all, after succesfull joining my new samba 4 DC to the domain. There is an error on using, samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names On the new joined dc: dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable Failed nsupdate: 1 How can I fix it!? Dnsupdate on the Master is running well. [root at s4slave etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names IPs: ['192.168.135.253'] Skipping PDC entry (SRV

Hi all, I'm trying to install the mixdist package with: install.packages("mixdist") But I'm getting the following errors: * installing *source* package ‘mixdist’ ... ** R ** data ** preparing package for lazy loading ** help *** installing help indices ** building package indices ... Warning in utils::data(list = f, package = package, lib.loc = lib.loc, envir = dataEnv) :

Dear all, after the feedbacks. I renew this HOWTO with replacation of a second SAMBA 4 PDC. We have 2 CentOS 5.5 servers on which we build a SAMBA4 forest with 2 Servers replication. We have one hosts called "node1" and the second "node2" Step1: On node1: Do not install the named coming with CentOs. This version can not do dns updates!!!! Install needs for samba. yum

Hi all, I've setup samba4 according to the samba4 wiki on centOS 5.4 in KVM. This went without any problems. I only had to install a higher version of bind to 9.6.x because Centos bind in repo will install version 9.3.x. I've used the Fedora12 source rpms for this to build bind 9.6.x on Centos 5.4. Then I configured bind according to the samba wiki

On 11/15/20 1:29 PM, John Fawcett wrote: >> atm, listening on localhost, with Dovecot -> Tika direct, no proxy. >> >> similarly fragile under load. throwing ~10 messages with .5-5MB attachments at it at once causes all sorts of complaints. frequently, like this Nov 15 15:59:40 test.loc tika[35696]: INFO tika/ (message/rfc822) Nov 15 15:59:41 test.loc tika[35696]: WARN

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:24:44PM +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba wrote: > Am 22.01.2018 um 10:49 schrieb Stefan Metzmacher via samba: > > Also DO NOT repair the following errors with samba-tool dbcheck! > > "Remove duplicate links in attribute" > > and > > "ERROR: orphaned backlink" > > as this removes the ability to repair the database >

I have tried to replace these lines from ipchains to work with shorewall. # /NFS requires 111/tcp (sunrpc/portmapper) and *all* UDP ports./ # ipchains -A input -p tcp -s $SUBNET -i eth0 -d 0/0 111 -j ACCEPT ipchains -A input -p udp -s $SUBNET -i eth0 -d 0/0 -j ACCEPT # /These ports are required by bootp, tftpd, and PXE./ # /There are also a handful of udp ports that need to/ # /be open,

I have a three interface network (net,loc,dmz). The internet interface (eth0) has a static IP. Windows machine in the local network (eth1) use DHCP to get IPs from the 192.168.10.0/24 netblock. The Debian machine in the DMZ (eth2) gets a fixed IP through DHCP in the 192.168.11.0/24 netblock. The DHCP server is running on the firewall machine (not ideal, I know, but that''s the way

On 11/15/20 12:21 PM, John Fawcett wrote: > I'm using tika-server.jar installed as a service yup. same here. atm, listening on localhost, with Dovecot -> Tika direct, no proxy. similarly fragile under load. throwing ~10 messages with .5-5MB attachments at it at once causes all sorts of complaints. one at a time seems OK ... > Dovecot currently implements separate integrations,

Hello! I have 2 data frames like this (well, actually, I have 200 of them): df1<-data.frame(location=c("loc 1","loc 2","loc 3"),date=c("1/1/2010","1/1/2010","1/1/2010"), a=1:3,b=11:13,c=111:113) df2<-data.frame(location=c("loc 1","loc 2","loc

Hi all, its a real nightmare for me. Although i have read and searched the web for two weeks i can`t get shorewall to work. problem is that we have only one server that acts as fileserver (samba, nis, nfs) and router/firewall for the lan. the server has two interfaces eth0 = lan and eth1 = internet. The only what we need is full access from the lan to the firewall and restricted access

I made a boo boo in my config and put in this rule #PPTP DNAT net:213.67.241.162/217.209.46.204/32 loc:192.168.221.200 tcp 1723 DNAT net:213.67.241.162/32,217.209.46.204/32 loc:192.168.221.200 47 - And the the following happened.. and I wonder why it didn''t complain? I am sure I am just misunderstanding some doc

Thanks. I think reusing the same volume was the cause of lack of IO distribution. The latest profile output looks much more realistic and in line with i would expect. Let me analyse the numbers a bit and get back. -Krutika On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:55 PM, <gencer at gencgiyen.com> wrote: > Hi Krutika, > > > > Thank you so much for myour reply. Let me answer all: > >

Hi Rowland, I have done the edits as you suggested and ran again the script that you provided. Below is the output. Collected config --- 2019-12-04-11:46 ----------- Hostname: esmad1apl01 DNS Domain: emea.media.global.loc FQDN: esmad1apl01.emea.media.global.loc ipaddress: 10.34.54.152 ----------- Kerberos SRV _kerberos._tcp.emea.media.global.loc record verified ok, sample output: ;;

Il giorno mar, 25/04/2017 alle 14.36 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > > However I would like to enable also the DHCP service, and think > > it's right to activate it on this server. > > > > What is the best way to do so? > > Well you could always do it the way I have been doing it for the last > 5 years, see here: > >

Hi Krutika, I also did one more test. I re-created another volume (single volume. Old one destroyed-deleted) then do 2 dd tests. One for 1GB other for 2GB. Both are 32MB shard and eager-lock off. Samples: sr:~# gluster volume profile testvol start Starting volume profile on testvol has been successful sr:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/testvol/dtestfil0xb bs=1G count=1 1+0 records in 1+0

Hi Krutika, Sure, here is volume info: root at sr-09-loc-50-14-18:/# gluster volume info testvol Volume Name: testvol Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: 30426017-59d5-4091-b6bc-279a905b704a Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 10 x 2 = 20 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: sr-09-loc-50-14-18:/bricks/brick1 Brick2: sr-09-loc-50-14-18:/bricks/brick2 Brick3: