search for: locl

On Thu Dec 14 19:27:29 2023 Matt Savin <matt at tegers.com> wrote: > > Hello Mark, > > When joining the domain, did you specify domain name as hprs.locl, or hprs > only? Please try to specify hprs.locl. > > BR, > Matt Matt - yes I did specify hprs.locl. I just tried it again and it failed again. This time I opened the "Detail" box which says: ------------------- The following error occurred when DNS was queried for the servi...

...another test location within the office where it will be deployed. The new test location connects to subnet 192.168.0.1 rather than 192.168.0 as I used when doing the initial setup. I've been going through the wiki verifying zones, rDNS, etc. On the A record test I get: # host -t A dc1.hprs.locl dc1.hprs.locl has address 192.168.0.2 dc1.hprs.locl has address 24.142.169.13 dc1.hprs.locl has address 192.168.0.126 dc1.hprs.locl has address 192.168.1.60 The first 3 of these are wrong/obsolete. The /etc/hosts file has the last entry (1.60) which is correct. My DNS backend is Samba Internal....

...fice where it will be deployed. The new test location > connects to subnet 192.168.0.1 rather than 192.168.0 as I used when > doing the initial setup. > > I've been going through the wiki verifying zones, rDNS, etc. On the A > record test I get: > > # host -t A dc1.hprs.locl > dc1.hprs.locl has address 192.168.0.2 > dc1.hprs.locl has address 24.142.169.13 > dc1.hprs.locl has address 192.168.0.126 > dc1.hprs.locl has address 192.168.1.60 > > The first 3 of these are wrong/obsolete. The /etc/hosts file has the > last entry (1.60) which is correct....

...> I have provisioned a new DC with Samba 4.18.5. This DC is intended to > replace an older one in my AD domain. > > The old/current DC has a number of Group Policies set. Can I "rsync" > /var/lib/samba/sysvol/hprs.local/policies/ to my new > /var/lib/samba/sysvol/hprs.locl/Policies/ per > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_replication_(DFS-R), or will > I have to manually create policies in the new DC? If this is a replacement DC for another DC in the same AD domain, then yes, you are expected to sync sysvol between DCs. You do not sync the 'Policies...

I have provisioned a new DC with Samba 4.18.5. This DC is intended to replace an older one in my AD domain. The old/current DC has a number of Group Policies set. Can I "rsync" /var/lib/samba/sysvol/hprs.local/policies/ to my new /var/lib/samba/sysvol/hprs.locl/Policies/ per https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_replication_(DFS-R), or will I have to manually create policies in the new DC? If copying over the old one is OK, there are already two folders in /var/lib/samba/sysvol/hprs.locl/Policies/ I'll have to avoid clobbering: # ls /var/lib/samb...

On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 02:36:33 -0500 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu Dec 14 22:49:33 2023 Mark Foley via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu Dec 14 19:27:29 2023 Matt Savin <matt at tegers.com> wrote: > > > I do not know who 'Matt Savin' is, but would he please reply to the list and not

....1.60 mail.hprs.local mail Since I had provisioned initially with the SAMBA_INTERNAL DNS backend, and therefore Samba manages DNS, I thought perhaps there was a "stale dns", so I went ahead and entered the old PW for administrator and got: Password for [administrator at HPRS.LOCL]: Failed to bind to uuid 50abc2a4-574d-40b3-9d66-ee4fd5fba076 for ncacn_ip_tcp:192.168.1.60[49153,sign,target_hostname=mail,abstract_syntax=50abc2a4-574d-40b3-9d66-ee4fd5fba076/0x00000005,localaddress=192.168.1.60] NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE ERROR: Connecting to DNS RPC server mail failed with (322122...

On Tue Dec 19 19:30:36 2023 "Samba @ Pegasusnz" <samba at pegasusnz.com> wrote: > > The zone is the domain e.g. hprs.locl > And the name is the name of the item you want to delete e.g. dc1 Thanks! That did it. --Mark > > On 20/12/2023, at 11:32?AM, Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue Dec 19 16:00:39 2023 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.o...

...on't know what [share] was used for and perhaps that is not needed. > > > > My entire current samba-tool provision generated smb.conf is: > > > > [global] > > dns forwarder = 209.18.47.61 > > netbios name = DC1 > > realm = HPRS.LOCL > > server role = active directory domain controller > > workgroup = HPRS > > idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes > > interfaces = lo, eth1 > > bind interfaces only = Yes > > > > load printers = no > > prin...

I was able to reproduce the problem with this self-contained example. Maybe it could be reproduced with an even smaller one ... library(tidyquant) # Loads tidyverse, tidyquant, financial pkgs, xts/zoo library(xts) dtV <- as.Date("2017-01-01") + 1:100 locL <- list( foo=xts(rnorm(100), order.by=dtV), bar=xts(rnorm(100), order.by=dtV) ) fullXts <- do.call(merge,locL) smallXts <- fullXts["2017-02-01::"] rolling_corrOnePair <- function( aXts, col1, col2, window ) { #window = window size in days tbl <- timetk::tk_tbl( aXts[,c...

...s some memory allocation and for Splus there is an ifdef which controls whether malloc or S_alloc is called. I did nm R.binary | grep alloc to see if this was supported and I find there are some choices: [2490] | 446036| 272|FUNC |GLOB |0 |7 |R_alloc [806] | 693956| 312|FUNC |LOCL |0 |7 |ReallocString [807] | 693220| 736|FUNC |LOCL |0 |7 |ReallocVector [3444] | 446308| 144|FUNC |GLOB |0 |7 |S_alloc [2429] | 446452| 200|FUNC |GLOB |0 |7 |S_realloc ... [2204] | 1445856| 0|FUNC |GLOB |0 |UNDEF |calloc [2595] | 1...

...==+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+=== so something is going wrong with the install. I did nm on spatstat.so, and sure enough got ===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+=== $ nm spatstat.so | grep f95 [189] | 185004| 4|OBJT |LOCL |0 |20 |__f95__happiness . . . [195] | 185008| 4|OBJT |LOCL |0 |20 |__f95__happiness [512] | 0| 0|FUNC |GLOB |0 |UNDEF |__f95_sign ===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+=== so, yep, it's unde...

...;load printers' bit was just to disable printing from the DC. I don't know what [share] was used for and perhaps that is not needed. My entire current samba-tool provision generated smb.conf is: [global] dns forwarder = 209.18.47.61 netbios name = DC1 realm = HPRS.LOCL server role = active directory domain controller workgroup = HPRS idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes interfaces = lo, eth1 bind interfaces only = Yes load printers = no printing = bsd printcap name = /dev/null disable spoolss = yes [sysvol]...

...to configure them. > > I don't know what [share] was used for and perhaps that is not needed. > > My entire current samba-tool provision generated smb.conf is: > > [global] > dns forwarder = 209.18.47.61 > netbios name = DC1 > realm = HPRS.LOCL > server role = active directory domain controller > workgroup = HPRS > idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes > interfaces = lo, eth1 > bind interfaces only = Yes > > load printers = no > printing = bsd > printcap name = /dev...

...ssntp restrict 127.0.0.1 restrict ::1 restrict source notrap nomodify noquery ntp is working: root at dommaster:~# ntpq -p remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter ============================================================================ == LOCAL(0) .LOCL. 10 l 39d 64 0 0.000 +0.000 0.000 0.debian.pool.n .POOL. 16 p - 64 0 0.000 +0.000 0.000 1.debian.pool.n .POOL. 16 p - 64 0 0.000 +0.000 0.000 2.debian.pool.n .POOL. 16 p - 64 0 0.000 +0.000 0.000 3.debian.pool...

I am on a rh 7.2 machinr running samba. My clients are windows 2000 and whn using locl profiles I experience quick log-ons and quicj log-offs. Whwn I flag the client for roaming profiles, it seems to take many minutes to log off. The users roaming directory IS created and is populated with their user inoformation, one user has 300M of stuff.Which I thought was alot. When the user...

...7.0.0.1 > restrict ::1 > restrict source notrap nomodify noquery > > ntp is working: > root at dommaster:~# ntpq -p > remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset > jitter > ============================================================================ > == > LOCAL(0) .LOCL. 10 l 39d 64 0 0.000 +0.000 > 0.000 > 0.debian.pool.n .POOL. 16 p - 64 0 0.000 +0.000 > 0.000 > 1.debian.pool.n .POOL. 16 p - 64 0 0.000 +0.000 > 0.000 > 2.debian.pool.n .POOL. 16 p - 64 0 0.000 +0.000 > 0.000 > 3.debian.pool.n .POOL. 16 p - 64 0 0.000 +0.000 > 0.000 >...

...> 127.0.0.1 restrict ::1 restrict source notrap nomodify noquery > > ntp is working: > root at dommaster:~# ntpq -p > remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter > ====================================================================== > ====== > == > LOCAL(0) .LOCL. 10 l 39d 64 0 0.000 +0.000 > 0.000 > 0.debian.pool.n .POOL. 16 p - 64 0 0.000 +0.000 > 0.000 > 1.debian.pool.n .POOL. 16 p - 64 0 0.000 +0.000 > 0.000 > 2.debian.pool.n .POOL. 16 p - 64 0 0.000 +0.000 > 0.000 > 3.debian.pool.n .POOL. 16 p - 64 0 0.000 +0.000 > 0.000 >...

...stop w32time > w32tm /unregister > w32tm /register > net start w32time > > I've rebooted both the DC and the Windows member. On the Windows member I still > get: > >> w32tm /query /source > Local CMOS Clock > > whereas I expect the return to be "dc1.hprs.locl" > > I have confirmed that the Group Policy exists and is configured correctly. > > What's going wrong here? > > Thanks --Mark > Hi Mark, If you're using ntpsec on the DC, that wont work. You must use chrony. I had the same problem some half year ago. Also, no n...

After BFU-ing my system to b75 I ended up with a panicing system when booting into Xen: grub> #---------- ADDED BY BOOTADM - DO NOT EDIT ---------- grub> title Solaris on Xen grub> kernel$ /boot/$ISADIR/xen.gz grub> module$ /platform/i86xpv/kernel/$ISADIR/unix /platform/i86xpv/kernel/$ISADIR/unix -B console=ttyb grub> module$ /platform/i86pc/$ISADIR/boot_archive grub>