search for: locksmithing

...es is as site locksmith (and reverse engineering rotating constant master key systems using the Edwards matrix system is one of my current areas of study, since the site's previous occupants didn't leave complete records of the dozen or so RCM key systems here); it is tacit knowledge in locksmithing circles that all security is security through obscurity (even in safes with included hardplate, the security is only as good as the obscurity of the locations of the hardplate's inclusions). But it doesn't matter how randomly you pick the progressions, or whether you use TPP or limited...

I am using the following simple menu and have noticed that items at the bottom are dropping off. I seem to be limited to 12 items. Is there a limit to how many items can be on the simple menu? default pxelinux.cfg/menu.c32 prompt 0 MENU TITLE UWSP PXE Boot Menu # TIMEOUT 200 LABEL bartpe MENU LABEL Build 12 KERNEL /STARTROM.0 APPEND keeppxe LABEL 11dnet MENU LABEL Build 11DNET beta

On 11/27/2017 02:02 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Pete Biggs wrote: >> - don't run ssh on 22, use a different port. > I consider that pointless security-through-obscurity. Security through obscurity it may be, but it isn't pointless. Tarpits are in a similar class; they don't help with security in the absolute sense, but they slow the attacker down, and that might

Pete Biggs wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 12:10 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: >> hi All, >> >> I happened to login to one of my servers today and saw 96000 failed >> login attempts. shown below is the address its coming from. I added it to my >> firewall to drop. >> >> Failed password for root from 123.183.209.135 port 14299 ssh2 >> >> FYI -

Hi, just a quick note to whoever is maintaining this page: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Network/SecuringSSH The procedure is missing the firewall-cmd calls necessary in EL7: firewall-cmd --add-port 2345/tcp firewall-cmd --add-port 2345/tcp --permanent Also, it may be worth mentioning that semanage is in the policycoreutils-python package, which isn?t installed by default in all stock

Hi, just a quick note to whoever is maintaining this page: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Network/SecuringSSH The procedure is missing the firewall-cmd calls necessary in EL7: firewall-cmd --add-port 2345/tcp firewall-cmd --add-port 2345/tcp --permanent Also, it may be worth mentioning that semanage is in the policycoreutils-python package, which isn?t installed by default in all stock

http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/3699540.html I'm supposed to write a Letter to the Editor to express my point of view and I should have a clear intention. My only trouble is having an intention and a point of view as I don't get that article at all. It's like written in gibberish. Can anyone please explain to me what it is about? Why am I so dumb in English.. Thanks in advance :)

I have read and read and read and cannot seem to figure this out. I am running Linux Mint 9 and trying to install a windows program that will never have a linux alternative. It is a locksmith code data base program called Code Source. Also has two accompanying programs: COA and Master King. Install requirements are simply windows 98 and newer OS according to HPC's (manufacture) website.

On Tue, November 28, 2017 9:21 am, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 11/27/2017 02:02 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Pete Biggs wrote: >>> - don't run ssh on 22, use a different port. >> I consider that pointless security-through-obscurity. > Security through obscurity it may be, but it isn't pointless. Tarpits are in a similar class; they don't help with security

I picked up the following from Bugtraq. -----Forwarded message from David Phillips <phillips@PCISYS.NET>----- MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <01BC5D8D.679DD4A0@frank56.pcisys.net> Date: Sat, 10 May 1997 21:56:05 -0600 Reply-To: David Phillips <phillips@PCISYS.NET> Sender: Bugtraq List

Dear Rails team, The handling of the recent vulnerability in Rails has proven somewhat problematic for us. We have recently adopted Rails as our web platform of choice; previously, we used J2EE. We love Rails. We hate J2EE. We don''t want to go back. It took a lot of effort and convincing to get the management teams of our various projects to sign off on the use of Rails. The