search for: lockingx

...l, We are considering moving our VSS database from a Win2K server to a samba server. All clients are Win2K clients. I used the VSS tool "testlock.exe" to make sure the native lock mode can be used. The test was successful, and I saw that an SMBlock transaction was performed, and a reply_lockingX was replied. When I opened a VSS database on the samba server and started to use it - I saw no SMBlock operations. Doesn't make sence to me, because some kind of locking must be done. Any ideas ? Thanks, Nir

...num=4677 max=1120 nread=0 Transaction 135 of length 76 switch message SMBtrans2 (pid 2942) conn 0x8f6b038 call_trans2qfilepathinfo: TRANSACT2_QFILEINFO: level = 1004 call_trans2qfilepathinfo cint95-intel.mtw (fnum = 4677) level=1004 call=7 total_data=0 Transaction 136 of length 75 switch message SMBlockingX (pid 2942) conn 0x8f6b038 push_sec_ctx(503, 103) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 push_conn_ctx(104) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 pop_sec_ctx (503, 103) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 lockingX fnum=4677 type=16 num_locks=1 num_ulocks=0 initial_break_processing: called for...

...c:(133) error packet at line 785 cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) eclass=1 ecode=5 [1999/01/21 14:02:33, 3] smbd/error.c:(143) error string = Permission denied [1999/01/21 14:02:33, 3] smbd/process.c:(565) Transaction 202304 of length 75 [1999/01/21 14:02:33, 3] smbd/process.c:(402) switch message SMBlockingX (pid 26589) [1999/01/21 14:02:33, 3] smbd/reply.c:(4055) lockingX fnum=4993 type=16 num_locks=1 num_ulocks=0 [1999/01/21 14:02:33, 3] smbd/process.c:(565) Transaction 202305 of length 75 [1999/01/21 14:02:33, 3] smbd/process.c:(402) switch message SMBlockingX (pid 26589) [1999/01/21 14:02:33,...

...wv[ 7]= 1 (0x1) smb_bcc=20 [2004/03/02 15:03:56, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1825) [000] FF FE 00 00 00 00 00 00 A8 FF FF 7F 00 00 00 00 ...... ..... [010] 01 00 00 00 .... [2004/03/02 15:03:56, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch message SMBlockingX (pid 32229) [2004/03/02 15:03:56, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(287) setting sec ctx (4012, 4000) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/03/02 15:03:56, 5] auth/auth_util.c:debug_nt_user_token(490) NT user token of user S-1-5-21-1139895982-289624505-398547282-1548 contains 8 SIDs SID[ 0]: S-1-5-21-...

...lt PrinterDriverData - Moved internal printerdata to REGISTRY_VALUE object - Corrected bug in dependentfiles list of DRIVER_INFO_3 - fixed logic bug in blocking locks code - Updated registry api code to work with new printer data key support - Added vfstest tool - round lock timeouts in lockingX upwards to multiples of 1 second - Fixed bugs in Printer Change Notify code - added a 'net ads lookup' command that does a CLDAP NetLogon query to a win2000 server - Added script to find undocumented smb.conf parameters - Added missing parameters to smb.conf(5) - receive & parse...

I'm hoping someone has some insight into a problem I'm currenty having, which is: No one is able to edit (in place) documents with Word 2000 on a samba (2.2.6) disk share. A user can open word and save a document to the share, but when they go to edit the document Word says "Word cannot complete the save due to a file permission error". From Microsoft KB Q211632 it appears

Jim@Morris.net wrote: > I have finally tracked down the reason I am experiencing problems with > DBase files on Samba file servers - initially Redhat 6, and now on > Caldera OpenLinux 2.2 as well. Great debugging work ! > The DOS client code uses a DBase library called CodeBase to access the > DBase files. When a record is appended to a file, the underlying C > code does the

...= 4572 (3 used) [2002/06/07 15:02:45, 5] smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(574) open_mode_check: oplock_request = 3, breaking oplock (3) on file O/a1/KO-I_X8-eh.cfg, dev = 900, inode = 1556659 Current oplocks_open (exclusive = 2, levelII = 0) Current oplocks_open (exclusive = 2, levelII = 0) lockingX fnum=4884 type=16 num_locks=2 num_ulocks=0 Current oplocks_open (exclusive = 2, levelII = 0) reply_lockingX: oplock break reply (0) from client for fnum = 4884 Current oplocks_open (exclusive = 1, levelII = 0) Current exclusive_oplocks_open = 1 [2002/06/07 15:02:45, 4] smbd/open.c:open_...

...the problem with BRL and posix locks. > For about a week already I can`t imagine or make some really illustrative > test (under Windows API or using Cygnus or just acting like an ordinary user) > that shows me how locks are used. Using recommended Ethereal sniffer I > have not ever seen lockingX call that, to my mind , to be dealt with. > And I could not spy function calls in posix.c and brlock.c modules. > I mean they haven`t ever appeared to me. Ok, but I don't actually know what BRL is or if its's supposed to do locking... Dos and Windows 3 apps assume that there is o...

...lock failed at offset 4294901760 count 65535 op 9 type 2 (No locks availa ble)jnveen closed file notes/w32/vviewlst.smi (numopen=1) [2001/08/14 10:09:33, 3] smbd/error.c:(123)7) error string = No locks available [2001/08/14 10:09:33, 3] smbd/error.c:(136)0) error packet at line 4520 cmd=36 (SMBlockingX) eclass=1 ecode=33 [2001/08/14 10:09:33, 3] smbd/process.c:(837) Transaction 325 of length 46d=160 (SMBnttrans) eclass=2 ecode=65535 At level 10 i see quite some differences between output from binaries compiled on HP-UX 10.20 and HP-UX 11. With the 64 bit binaries i see an error instead of a...