Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "lockert".
Did you mean:
locker
2003 Oct 15
0
Asterisk running on OpenBSD 3.3
...;t have any glowing announcements in big flashing letters, so I figure I'll put one up for everyone to use in their keyword searches.
There are only trivial patches required in the Makefile to get it working under 3.3, and the CC line patch is not even necessary for 3.4 (according to Thorsten Lockert, the principal driving force behind getting this to work on OpenBSD).
Patch /usr/src/asterisk/Makefile with these trivial patches:
--- Makefile~ Wed Oct 15 07:16:08 2003
+++ Makefile Wed Oct 15 07:16:08 2003
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
PROC=$(shell uname -m)
endif
# Pentium Pro Optimize
-#PROC=i686...
2004 Jan 08
2
Asterisk Development Updates
Prompted by the recent discussion on the mailing list regarding the
Asterisk development and release process (or lack thereof), John Todd,
Thorsten Lockert, Brian K. West, and myself have put together a plan to
address the most significant two legitimate concerns that have been
expressed regarding these processes. Specifically:
Concern #1: Asterisk release schedules and path to 1.0.0
Asterisk version 0.7.0 will be released by Monday Jan 12, 2004....
2003 Jul 09
1
OpenBSD version???
John Todd's Onlamp article mentions an OpenBSD version as of June 2003.
Have I been sleeping while reading asterisk-users?
Is it a seperate project or is it just making Asterisk portable?
Who is working on this and is it in the main CVS yet?
Do they have device drivers ported or just the software parts of
Asterisk? I think the software parts would be relatively simple but
time consuming.
2005 Sep 21
2
Macro exists if an application returned -1
Hi all,
I use asterisk cvs-head from last week and was wondering why my macros are
not working like I expected.
A macro will be aborted if one application returns error (-1), but some
applications (like ChanIsAvail() in my case) do return -1.
So when I want to use ChanIsAvail() in a macro, it does not work if the
channel is not available, because the macro is not executed on n+101.
The macro
2003 Sep 29
3
RE: SIP i.e. Is something broken?
Is it safe to assume that a fresh CVS build will not have the SIP
translation problem described?
Regards,
Christopher
--__--__--
Message: 11
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:45:40 -0700
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
From: "Ernest W. Lessenger" <ernest@oacys.com>
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Is somthing broken?
Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
At 12:33 PM 9/29/2003, you
2004 Jan 08
0
RE: [Asterisk-Dev] Asterisk Development Updates
...sday, January 08, 2004 4:45 PM
To: asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com; asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Dev] Asterisk Development Updates
Prompted by the recent discussion on the mailing list regarding the
Asterisk development and release process (or lack thereof), John Todd,
Thorsten Lockert, Brian K. West, and myself have put together a plan to
address the most significant two legitimate concerns that have been
expressed regarding these processes. Specifically:
Concern #1: Asterisk release schedules and path to 1.0.0
Asterisk version 0.7.0 will be released by Monday Jan 12, 2004....