Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "lockdown_m".
Did you mean:
lockdown_ms
2015 Aug 06
2
Re: Cannot boot libvirt guests with OVMF. Raw qemu-kvm works as expected
...virt-manager.
>
>q35 doesn't help here. secureboot is in the EFI config menus (press
><ESC> or <DEL> in the guest while booting, go look at the boot
>configuration, and you'll see secureboot options -- it's disabled by
>default and not able to be enabled until LockDown_ms is applied).
>
Oh, so that's what I misunderstood, sorry for that.
>What I don't understand is why this matters, since I was able to boot
>with basically the generated command (see below) from a console, but
>it's 100% reproducible.
>
>>
>>>> Using qe...
2015 Aug 04
2
Re: Cannot boot libvirt guests with OVMF. Raw qemu-kvm works as expected
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:39:30PM -0700, Ryan Barry wrote:
>On 08/03/2015 01:43 PM, Ryan Barry wrote:
>> Using:
>>
>> edk2.git-0-20150803.b1141.ga0973dc.x86_64
>> edk2.git-ovmf-x64-0-20150802.b1139.gb234418.noarch
>>
>> On Fedora 22.
>>
>> Provisioning a i440FX system in virt-manager and attempting to boot
>> results in successful EFI
2015 Aug 04
0
Re: Cannot boot libvirt guests with OVMF. Raw qemu-kvm works as expected
...t anywhere in
> virt-manager.
q35 doesn't help here. secureboot is in the EFI config menus (press
<ESC> or <DEL> in the guest while booting, go look at the boot
configuration, and you'll see secureboot options -- it's disabled by
default and not able to be enabled until LockDown_ms is applied).
What I don't understand is why this matters, since I was able to boot
with basically the generated command (see below) from a console, but
it's 100% reproducible.
>
>>> Using qemu-kvm directly (qemu-kvm -bios
>>> /usr/share/edk2.git/ovmf-x64/OVMF_CODE-...
2015 Aug 06
0
Re: Cannot boot libvirt guests with OVMF. Raw qemu-kvm works as expected
...gt;> q35 doesn't help here. secureboot is in the EFI config menus
>> (press <ESC> or <DEL> in the guest while booting, go look at the
>> boot configuration, and you'll see secureboot options -- it's
>> disabled by default and not able to be enabled until LockDown_ms
>> is applied).
>>
>
> Oh, so that's what I misunderstood, sorry for that.
>
>> What I don't understand is why this matters, since I was able to
>> boot with basically the generated command (see below) from a
>> console, but it's 100% reproduci...