search for: locas

How to I "recode" a factor into a binary data frame according to the factor levels: ### example:start set.seed(20) l <- sample(rep.int(c("locA", "locB", "locC", "locD"), 100), 10, replace=T) # [1] "locD" "locD" "locD" "locD" "locB" "locA" "locA" "locA"

I have multiple Asterisk instances set up in different locations and would like to modify the callerID of inbound calls to identify which instance the call is coming from.? I knew how to do that with the old sip format, but can't seem to figure it out with PJSip. For example: Currently Location A, extension 10 calls Location B, extension 20.? CallerID on Extension 20 displays

Xen Host Server OS: SLES10 Kernel: 2.6.16.21-0.8-xen x86_64 Hardware: Sun 4200 Memory: 12Gb Guest Domains (2 total) RHEL4-U3 2.6.16-xen x86_64 2Gb Swap 4Gb RAM 2 Nics bridged to seperate physical Nics (Public and Private) Systems come up normal and we are able to mount filer space to the guest domains and do work. However, at some point, the guest

On 07/14/2017 03:00 PM, Davide Italiano via llvm-dev wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Nuno Lopes via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I going through the alias analysis documentation >> (http://llvm.org/docs/AliasAnalysis.html) and noticed the following in the >> definition of PartialAlias: >> " >> The

Hi, I going through the alias analysis documentation (http://llvm.org/docs/AliasAnalysis.html) and noticed the following in the definition of PartialAlias: " The PartialAlias response is used when the two memory objects are known to be overlapping in some way, but *do not start at the same address*. " Is it really required that the objects do no start at the same address? if

Hello everyone, Proceeding with an effort to optimize pointer-arg-to-struct-with-data-pointer arrangement, I'm taking a shot at writing a specific AA pass. I've got a scaffold up modelling after BasicAA and bumped into a few issues. Here's a snippet of IR I'm dealing with. Slice is the wrapper structure and "data" pointer is element 0 and we're looking at two of

Whenever i try and instal ultima online i get pretty far into the instalation and then when it gets to the part where i need to select a directory if i try to type in the location or anything it crashes. if i do nothing i can't go any farther. Help!?

### example:start v <- sample(rnorm(200), 100, replace=T) k <- rep.int(c("locA", "locB", "locC", "locD"), 25) tapply(v, k, summary) ### example:end ... (hopefully) produces 4 summaries of v according to k group membership. How can I transform the output into a nice table with the croups as columns and the interesting statistics as lines? Thx,

Thank you all for your replies. So here seems to be an agreement that the documentation for PartialAlias is incorrect. Daniel: now you got me wondering about MustAlias. This is what the docs say: "The MustAlias response may only be returned if the two memory objects are *guaranteed to always start at exactly the same location*" This statement is regardless of the access sizes. For

On Sun, Jul 16, 2017, 12:45 PM Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote: > >On 07/15/2017 04:51 AM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > >>> On 07/14/2017 04:37 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > >>>> Thank you all for your replies. > >>>> So here seems to be an agreement that the documentation for > >>>> PartialAlias is incorrect. > >>>>

On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > On 07/15/2017 04:51 AM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > >> On 07/14/2017 04:37 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: >>> >>>> Thank you all for your replies. >>>> So here seems to be an agreement that the documentation for >>>> PartialAlias is incorrect. >>>>

> On 07/14/2017 04:37 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: >> Thank you all for your replies. >> So here seems to be an agreement that the documentation for PartialAlias >> is incorrect. >> >> Daniel: now you got me wondering about MustAlias. This is what the docs >> say: >> "The MustAlias response may only be returned if the two memory objects >> are

Hello everyone, I am trying to find the alias between a store instruction's pointer operand and function arguments. This is the code, virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.addRequiredTransitive<AliasAnalysis>(); AU.addPreserved<AliasAnalysis>(); } virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F) { AliasAnalysis &AA =

Hello LLVMdev, I’m using LLVM to do static analysis exclusively (without any code generation). To implement this analysis, I’m using multiple address spaces to disambiguate the purpose of the pointed memory. Since address spaces never alias in my model, I set on to implement an alias analysis pass that would exactly provide this information, as I’m seeing a couple of otherwise dead store that

It contains the bitcode file(without any optimization) of the below program, void map(int *a) { *a=20; } int main(){ int *a=(int *)malloc(sizeof(int)); *a=15; map(a); return 0; } I want to check if the pointer operand of each store instruction aliases with the function's arguments. I have used below code for this, virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {

...ocumentation. +1 The flaw here seems to be in the way that DA is using AA. DependenceAnalysis's underlyingObjectsAlias is doing this:   // Check the original locations (minus size) for noalias, which can happen for   // tbaa, incompatible underlying object locations, etc.   MemoryLocation LocAS(LocA.Ptr, LocationSize::unknown(), LocA.AATags);   MemoryLocation LocBS(LocB.Ptr, LocationSize::unknown(), LocB.AATags);   if (AA->alias(LocAS, LocBS) == NoAlias)     return NoAlias;   // Check the underlying objects are the same   const Value *AObj = GetUnderlyingObject(LocA.Ptr, DL);   const...

List, how can I put fax server functionality on Asterisk? * as a reliable fax server for 500-1000 fax/day (mostly incoming)? Fax server should be like HylaFax, i.e. stable, low maintenance and functionality like receiving fax as email with PDF attachment, sending faxes per WHFC. Faxing with spandsp using bri_stuff (BeroNet/Junghanns quadBRI ISDN cards) shortens some faxes, or faxes loose lines,

On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017, 12:45 PM Nuno Lopes wrote: >>> >>>> On 07/15/2017 04:51 AM, Nuno Lopes wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 07/14/2017 04:37 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you all for your replies.

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote: > On 15 January 2015 at 13:10, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > >> Yes. >> I've attached an updated patch that does the following: >> >> 1. Fixes the partialalias of globals/arguments >> 2. Enables partialalias for cases where nothing has been unified to