search for: localport

...ssh.1.patch ================ --- ssh.1 2012/09/15 16:08:48 1.1 +++ ssh.1 2012/09/15 20:23:35 @@ -51,13 +51,13 @@ .Op Fl F Ar configfile .Op Fl I Ar pkcs11 .Op Fl i Ar identity_file -.Op Fl L Oo Ar bind_address : Oc Ns Ar port : Ns Ar host : Ns Ar hostport +.Op Fl L Oo Ar bind_address : Oc Ns Ar localport : Ns Ar remoteaddr : Ns Ar remoteport .Op Fl l Ar login_name .Op Fl m Ar mac_spec .Op Fl O Ar ctl_cmd .Op Fl o Ar option .Op Fl p Ar port -.Op Fl R Oo Ar bind_address : Oc Ns Ar port : Ns Ar host : Ns Ar hostport +.Op Fl R Oo Ar bind_address : Oc Ns Ar remoteport : Ns Ar localaddr : Ns Ar loca...

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413 Summary: Port forwarding: [localhost:]localport:remotehost:remoteport Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: older versions Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org...

I'm currently trying to set up a kind of vhost, using a second LocalPort; I notice that this isn't reported in auth.log yet, thus this feature request. Thanks!

Hi, quite often I find myself using commands like $ ssh foo nc bar 12345 to connect to another host behind a firewall, and I also have a lot of these commands in my ssh config file. Since this relies on the server having netcat available (which a lot don't, or in some really old version that will not shut down properly) it breaks often, and I wonder whether it would make sense to have an

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #229 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-06-04 21:37 -------

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mohit_aron at hotmail.com ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2004-06-06 12:12 ------- *** Bug 876 has been marked

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sjc at makalumedia.com ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-11-22 09:48 ------- *** Bug 441 has been marked as

Hi! ---- I'm doing some testing with the ssh client OpenSSH on Windows 10 (10.0-19045) but due to firewall restrictions I need to run my experiments from a local port < 1024 (not negotiable). I thought that this was no problem... but ssh |bind()| fails with "address in use" (yes, I checked netstat, no one is there) for any port < 1023. Then I checked $ netstat # and $ netsh

...c index 59bb426..7271f1f 100644 --- a/efi/udp.c +++ b/efi/udp.c @@ -336,6 +336,9 @@ void core_udp_sendto(struct pxe_pvt_inode *socket, const void *data, memset(&udata, 0, sizeof(udata)); + /* Re-use the existing local port number if any */ + udata.StationPort = socket->net.efi.localport; + memcpy(&udata.StationAddress, &IPInfo.myip, sizeof(IPInfo.myip)); memcpy(&udata.SubnetMask, &IPInfo.netmask, sizeof(IPInfo.netmask)); memcpy(&udata.RemoteAddress, &ip, sizeof(ip)); @@ -373,6 +376,21 @@ void core_udp_sendto(struct pxe_pvt_inode *socket, cons...

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2003-02-03 19:50 ------- i'll look into this. ------- You are

server is running openssh 4.6p1 on linux x86 (32bit) client is running openssh 4.6p1 on linux x86_64 (64bit) Just connecting from the client to the server and running "top" long enough results in: Disconnecting: Bad packet length 3690378913. This seems like a 32/64 bit problem to me. -- Andreas Steinmetz SPAMmers use robotrap at domdv.de

Greetings, I want to create a set of rules that will be in affect when I connection originates from outside of my local lan (internet) and on a specific port, this is what I've wrote: Match LocalPort 11111, Address *,!10.0.0.0/24 but when I start ssh, I get this error: Invalid LocalPort '11111,' on Match line /etc/ssh/sshd_config line 176: Bad Match condition why is that? how can I solve it? Thanks.

Hi, i have qmail + vpopmail + dovecot + squirrelmail 0.99.14 on Fedora Core 4. Qmail includes its own pop3 server, and everybody is able to access it from outside. Dovecot is used only locally by SquirrelMail - so everybody can access via webmail. I'd like to make imap directly available from outside, but only for a few selected domains (NOT ip addresses!), while leaving everyone able to

...-- orig_repo/syslinux-master/efi/udp.c 2015-06-09 02:50:15.000000000 -0700 +++ syslinux-master/efi/udp.c 2015-06-02 05:54:11.000000000 -0700 @@ -150,11 +150,15 @@ void core_udp_connect(struct pxe_pvt_ino /* Re-use the existing local port number */ udata.StationPort = socket->net.efi.localport; - udata.UseDefaultAddress = TRUE; + udata.UseDefaultAddress = FALSE; memcpy(&udata.RemoteAddress, &ip, sizeof(ip)); udata.RemotePort = port; udata.AcceptPromiscuous = TRUE; udata.TimeToLive = 64; + ip = IPInfo.myip; + memcpy(&udata.StationAddress, &amp...

As far as I have been able to figure out, dovecot auth always works over a Unix domain socket. I believe it is not currently possible to operate dovecot auth over an Internet domain (TCP) socket. Am I correct? I want to call dovecot's exported authentication from a Java application. Java doesn't natively know how to talk to a Unix domain socket, so there are inconveniences. There

When attempting to build syslinux in parallel (make -j5), I encountered the following error at the end: rm -f liblpxelinux.a ar cq liblpxelinux.a rawcon.o ./fs/pxe/dhcp_option.o ./fs/pxe/pxe.o ./fs/pxe/tftp.o ./fs/pxe/urlparse.o ./lwip/src/netif/ethernetif.o ./lwip/src/netif/etharp.o ./lwip/src/netif/slipif.o ./lwip/src/netif/ppp/md5.o ./lwip/src/netif/ppp/randm.o ./lwip/src/netif/ppp/chpms.o

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-01-24 14:27 ------- Created an attachment (id=782) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=782&action=view) forward-bind.sh: regression test for binding port forwards to addresses Current limitations of test: - no testing of IPv6 - no testing of backwards compat

...FTP protocol uses the local port + * number as the TID. + */ + status = uefi_call_wrapper(udp->GetModeData, 5, udp, + &udata, NULL, NULL, NULL); + if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) + Print(L"Failed to get UDP mode data: %d\n", status); + else + socket->net.efi.localport = udata.StationPort; + return 0; bail: @@ -89,7 +100,6 @@ void core_udp_close(struct pxe_pvt_inode *socket) void core_udp_connect(struct pxe_pvt_inode *socket, uint32_t ip, uint16_t port) { - EFI_UDP4_CONFIG_DATA udata; EFI_STATUS status; EFI_UDP4 *udp; @@ -113,20...

I did change both instances of txdata->GatewayAddress, but I think something may be wrong in my toolchain. If I extract syslinux.zip and attempt to make from there (without modifying any files), the cached DHCP packet isn't read on the same subnet. I receive "Succeed to download NBP file." twice before anything from syslinux is loaded, so I believe the duplicate request for

..., f, status); if (!efi_net_def_addr && (status == EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER)) efi_net_def_addr = 2; } @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ void core_udp_connect(struct pxe_pvt_inode *socket, uint32_t ip, /* Re-use the existing local port number */ udata.StationPort = socket->net.efi.localport; +retry: if (efi_net_def_addr) { udata.UseDefaultAddress = TRUE; } else { @@ -170,6 +171,11 @@ void core_udp_connect(struct pxe_pvt_inode *socket, uint32_t ip, udata.TimeToLive = 64; status = core_udp_configure(udp, &udata, L"core_udp_connect"); + if (efi_...