Displaying 20 results from an estimated 111 matches for "localparts".
Did you mean:
localpart
2020 Oct 21
1
Corrupted dbox file + assertion failure
Hi all,
a dsync failed due a corrupted mdbox file. Force-resync throws the same error.
(Dovecot 2.3.9.2)
Is there any change to fix/repair the file?
dsync-local(LOCALPART at DOMAIN.TLD)<MBF5EUC8j1/FfQAAkqONGQ>: Warning: fscking index file /var/mail/12/DOMAIN.TLD/242/LOCALPART/mdbox/storage/dovecot.map.index
dsync-local(LOCALPART at DOMAIN.TLD)<MBF5EUC8j1/FfQAAkqONGQ>: Warning:
2015 Apr 07
2
Sieve, multiple addresses, and variables
Hi,
I have another sieve question, this time about setting variables.
I join a lot of mailing lists at ietf.org. I thought it'd be handy to
filter these all into a common folder and then into individual
folders, without having to configure each mailing list independently.
So wrote this (this is just a part, obviously):
require ["envelope", "variables",
2019 Feb 11
2
smtp_address_cmp does not ignore case of localpart
Hi,
in src/lib-smtp/smtp-address.c line 759 the localpart is compared with
null_strcmp, which does not ignore the case. While this is the correct
behavior (according to the RFC) it causes problems in real life.
In my case the vacation notices are not sent, if someone writes to
First.Last at ruhr-uni-bochum.de because :addresses contains (only)
first.last at ruhr-uni-bochum.de.
Regards,
2014 Oct 22
1
Dovecot Master/Master Replication Problem
Hi,
I've set up 2 servers with dovecot 2.2.9 using maildir using structure:
/var/maildir/domain/localpart
Server A: mx1.xxx.de
Server B: mx2.xxx.de
Mails are delivered to dovecot only on server A by exim4/dovecot deliver
replication to Server B works immediatelly:
mark mail as read on server A, mail is marked as read on server B.
BUT: when i mark a mail as read on Server B, noting
2018 Jan 31
2
lda: Warning: Failed to parse return-path header: Invalid character in localpart
Hello,
Sometimes, when delivering mails, this warning appears in my syslog:
> lda(...): Warning: Failed to parse return-path header: Invalid
character in localpart
dovecot-lda still exits with 0 and the mail is inserted into my inbox.
Looking at the mails in question, I determined that the error is caused
by a multiline Return-Path header. Here's a testcase:
--- snip ---
2018 Jan 31
2
lda: Warning: Failed to parse return-path header: Invalid character in localpart
Hello,
On 31.01.2018 22:35, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Op 1/31/2018 om 6:17 PM schreef Christian Authmann:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Sometimes, when delivering mails, this warning appears in my syslog:
>>
>>> lda(...): Warning: Failed to parse return-path header: Invalid
>> character in localpart
>>
>> dovecot-lda still exits with 0 and the mail is inserted
2015 Apr 08
0
Sieve, multiple addresses, and variables
On 4/7/2015 10:48 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have another sieve question, this time about setting variables.
>
> I join a lot of mailing lists at ietf.org. I thought it'd be handy to
> filter these all into a common folder and then into individual
> folders, without having to configure each mailing list independently.
>
> So wrote this (this is just a
2018 Jan 31
0
lda: Warning: Failed to parse return-path header: Invalid character in localpart
Op 1/31/2018 om 6:17 PM schreef Christian Authmann:
> Hello,
>
> Sometimes, when delivering mails, this warning appears in my syslog:
>
> > lda(...): Warning: Failed to parse return-path header: Invalid
> character in localpart
>
> dovecot-lda still exits with 0 and the mail is inserted into my inbox.
>
>
> Looking at the mails in question, I determined that the
2018 Jan 31
0
lda: Warning: Failed to parse return-path header: Invalid character in localpart
Op 1/31/2018 om 10:44 PM schreef Christian Authmann:
> Hello,
> On 31.01.2018 22:35, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>> Op 1/31/2018 om 6:17 PM schreef Christian Authmann:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Sometimes, when delivering mails, this warning appears in my syslog:
>>>
>>>> lda(...): Warning: Failed to parse return-path header: Invalid
>>>
2019 Jan 25
2
Bug with latest GCC 9
Hi.
As mentioned here:
https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1123136
there's a new issue with GCC 9, it's related to:
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-9/porting_to.html#complit
in:
/* Not const! Never return this as a result directly! */
#define SMTP_ADDRESS_LITERAL(localpart, domain) \
&((struct smtp_address){ (localpart), (domain) })
Thanks,
Martin
2019 Feb 12
0
smtp_address_cmp does not ignore case of localpart
On 11/02/2019 22:43, Andreas Jobs via dovecot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in src/lib-smtp/smtp-address.c line 759 the localpart is compared with
> null_strcmp, which does not ignore the case. While this is the correct
> behavior (according to the RFC) it causes problems in real life.
>
> In my case the vacation notices are not sent, if someone writes to
> First.Last at
2019 Feb 12
1
smtp_address_cmp does not ignore case of localpart
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 08:12:43AM +0100, John Fawcett via dovecot wrote:
>On 11/02/2019 22:43, Andreas Jobs via dovecot wrote:
>In practice if you convert the username part to lower case in the MTA
>then you will accept mail with mixed case but only have to deal with
>lowercase in Dovecot.
Yes, but the vacation action (also) compares :addresses against the
header to|cc|sender... And
2019 Apr 25
2
Bug with latest GCC 9
On 1/25/19 8:24 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>
>
> Op 25/01/2019 om 10:59 schreef Martin Li?ka:
>> Hi.
>>
>> As mentioned here:
>> https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1123136
>>
>> there's a new issue with GCC 9, it's related to:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-9/porting_to.html#complit
>>
>> in:
>> /* Not const! Never
2015 Dec 22
0
FWD: Syslinux post from localpart@domain.tld requires approval
Hello,
Usually is it easy to identify a valid non-subscriber-posting.
Example given: the four postings about "bugzilla is back" in last day.
Today there is a posting from
the data plane development kit project, http://dpdk.org/
DPDK is a set of libraries and drivers for fast packet processing.
Packets being network packets.
That posting is not spam, but it should not go to this
2016 May 01
2
Changing Password Schemes
First of all, you can probably go online before you convert all passwords. You can modify your query in dovecot-sql.conf.ext to something like the following:
SELECT IF(crypt_pass IS NULL OR crypt_pass='', CONCAT('{PLAIN}',plain_pass), crypt_pass) as password FROM mailuser ..
This is assuming that:
* for incoming users, you have a plain_pass column containing just the plaintext
2010 Mar 06
5
Quota plugin and SQL
I have read through http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota/Dict, which suggests a
database schema for using quota. For 1.2, this includes a username,
bytes and messages.
Is there any way to modify the queries used to split out username into
localpart and domain? This would enable me to put the current quota
information in my main mailbox table and display it to users in my admin
interface.
Or
2019 Jun 14
2
Dovecot LMTP rejecting mail from address with apostrophe
Hi,
I have an OpenSMTPD / Dovecot installation on an OpenBSD server. I recently came across an issue where Dovecot LMTP would reject a message sent to a local user from an address which contains a single apostrophe (e.g. firstname.o'lastname at example.com). Apparently apostrophe, as well as a number of other special characters, are valid characters in the local part of the email address
2019 Nov 16
2
Sieve and recipient_delimiter
I use recipient_delimiter addresseses quiet a bit, and I want to put several of them into a mailbox
if anyof (header :contains ["to"] [ ?FOO", ?foo", ?bar", ?florin"]) {
fileinto :create ?later";
stop;
}
When I get an email addressed to me+FOO at example.com or me_florin at example.com, the messages end up in my inbox (Yes, I have both + and _
2015 Jan 04
0
dmarc_moderaction_action
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 03:14:51PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > dmarc_moderation_action (privacy): Action to take when anyone posts
> > to the list from a domain with a DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy.
> >
> > Wrap Message -- applies the "from_is_list Wrap Message" transformation
> > to these messages.
> >
> > from_is_list
2015 Jan 04
3
dmarc_moderaction_action
( previous thread at http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-January/023050.html )
>
> <info from="web interface mailman" extra_from="backend mailinglist software">
> dmarc_moderation_action Option
> dmarc_moderation_action (privacy): Action to take when anyone posts
> to the list from a domain with a DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy.
>
>