Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "localgrp".
Did you mean:
local_ip
2012 Oct 10
6
How can I show only the shares that user have access to in SAMBA
...d by using the below in smb.conf file
hide dot files = yes
hide unreadable = yes
in the share definition section.
but its still visible
security is set as user
here the part of my smb.conf
------------------
[kmplan]
??? writeable = yes
??? path = /opt/network/testplan
??? write list = @localgrp
??? revalidate = yes
??????? hide unreadable = yes
??? hide dot files = yes
??? comment = masterplan testing directory
??? valid users = @localgrp
-----------------
is there anything i need to set in smb.conf
appreciate your help and advice
regards
simon
2004 Jan 21
0
AD Primary Group Masked by Local Primary Group
Solaris 8, Samba 3.0.1, Winbind with LDAP backend and security = ads.
This may or may not be a problem, depending on what is "expected behaviour".
We came across a user that was defined both locally and in AD. Their local
primary group, call it "localgrp", was not the same as their global primary
group, call it "globalgrp". One important note is that by using an LDAP
browser, we can see that the user is not explicitly a Member Of globalgrp
(ie: there is no "member" entry for the user in globalgrp). The only way
the user is...
2007 May 18
2
force group to Unix group in 3.0.25
...It also works if I set the "force group" setting to a domain group. It only fails with a local Unix group.
Any pointers to what I can try to resolve this in 3.0.25 ?
Thanks,
Mike
----
3.0.24 -- ok
[2007/05/18 11:57:02, 10] passdb/lookup_sid.c:lookup_name(64)
lookup_name: Unix Group\localgrp => Unix Group (domain), localgrp (name)
[2007/05/18 11:57:02, 10] passdb/lookup_sid.c:sid_to_gid(1324)
sid_to_gid: S-1-22-2-561 -> 561
[2007/05/18 11:57:02, 3] smbd/service.c:find_forced_group(493)
Forced group localgrp
---------------------------
3.0.25 -- failed
[2007/05/18 11:55:14, 1...
2007 Jan 15
1
Winbind nested groups not working
Is the "winbind nested groups" functionality not currently working in
Samba 3.0.23d? The readme files seem to indicate it should be (since
3.0.3), but then this message by Jerry to the list...
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.samba/msg/5ecc575f70af3c8c
...seems to indicate that there's some patch waiting for 3.0.24.
Unfortunately he's not specific as to what it