search for: local_users_only

...m_sss.so account required pam_permit.so account requisite pam_unix.so try_first_pass account sufficient pam_localuser.so account required pam_sss.so use_first_pass account sufficient pam_localuser.so password requisite pam_pwquality.so try_first_pass local_users_only retry=3 authtok_type= password sufficient pam_unix.so md5 shadow nullok try_first_pass use_authtok password sufficient pam_sss.so use_authtok password required pam_deny.so password requisite pam_cracklib.so password optional pam_gnome_keyring.so use...

...equired pam_unix.so broken_shadow > account sufficient pam_succeed_if.so uid < 2000 quiet > account [default=bad success=ok user_unknown=ignore] pam_sss.so > account required pam_permit.so > > password requisite pam_pwquality.so try_first_pass > local_users_only retry=3 authtok_type= > password sufficient pam_unix.so md5 shadow nullok try_first_pass > use_authtok > password sufficient pam_sss.so use_authtok > password required pam_deny.so > > session optional pam_keyinit.so revoke > session required...

On 05/09/2015 01:24 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > Is it normal to have pam_unix and pam_sss twice for each each section? No. See my previous message. I think it's the result of copying portions of SuSE configurations.

...pam_deny.so account required pam_unix.so broken_shadow account sufficient pam_succeed_if.so uid < 2000 quiet account [default=bad success=ok user_unknown=ignore] pam_sss.so account required pam_permit.so password requisite pam_pwquality.so try_first_pass local_users_only retry=3 authtok_type= password sufficient pam_unix.so md5 shadow nullok try_first_pass use_authtok password sufficient pam_sss.so use_authtok password required pam_deny.so session optional pam_keyinit.so revoke session required pam_limits.so -session optio...

...equired pam_unix.so broken_shadow > account sufficient pam_succeed_if.so uid < 2000 quiet > account [default=bad success=ok user_unknown=ignore] pam_sss.so > account required pam_permit.so > > password requisite pam_pwquality.so try_first_pass > local_users_only retry=3 authtok_type= > password sufficient pam_unix.so md5 shadow nullok try_first_pass > use_authtok > password sufficient pam_sss.so use_authtok > password required pam_deny.so > > session optional pam_keyinit.so revoke > session required...

...hadow account sufficient pam_localuser.so account sufficient pam_succeed_if.so uid < 1000 quiet account [default=bad success=ok user_unknown=ignore] pam_winbind.so account required pam_permit.so password requisite pam_pwquality.so pam_cracklib.so try_first_pass local_users_only retry=3 authtok_type= password sufficient pam_unix.so md5 shadow nullok try_first_pass use_authtok password sufficient pam_winbind.so use_authtok password required pam_deny.so session optional pam_keyinit.so revoke session required pam_limits.so -session o...

...pam_permit.so > account requisite pam_unix.so try_first_pass > account sufficient pam_localuser.so > account required pam_sss.so use_first_pass > account sufficient pam_localuser.so > > password requisite pam_pwquality.so try_first_pass > local_users_only retry=3 authtok_type= > password sufficient pam_unix.so md5 shadow nullok try_first_pass > use_authtok > password sufficient pam_sss.so use_authtok > password required pam_deny.so > password requisite pam_cracklib.so > password optional...

..._shadow account???? sufficient??? pam_localuser.so account???? sufficient??? pam_succeed_if.so uid < 1000 quiet account???? [default=bad success=ok user_unknown=ignore] pam_winbind.so cached_login account???? required????? pam_permit.so password??? requisite???? pam_pwquality.so try_first_pass local_users_only retry=3 authtok_type= password??? sufficient??? pam_unix.so sha512 shadow nullok try_first_pass use_authtok password??? sufficient??? pam_winbind.so use_authtok password??? required????? pam_deny.so session???? optional????? pam_keyinit.so revoke session???? required????? pam_limits.so -session???...

I'm experimenting with smb + winbind. My host is joined to AD and I can login to my host fine using my AD credentials via SSH.?? The only issue is that I don't get a Kerberos ticket generated. In /etc/security/pam_winbind.conf I have: krb5_auth = yes krb5_ccache_type = KEYRING In /etc/krb5.conf, I also have: default_ccache_name = KEYRING:persistent:%{uid} Using wbinfo -K jas, then

...required pam_unix.so account sufficient pam_localuser.so account sufficient pam_succeed_if.so uid < 1000 quiet account [default=bad success=ok user_unknown=ignore] pam_sss.so account required pam_permit.so password requisite pam_pwquality.so try_first_pass local_users_only retry=3 authtok_type= password sufficient pam_unix.so sha512 shadow nullok try_first_pass use_authtok password sufficient pam_sss.so use_authtok password required pam_deny.so session optional pam_keyinit.so revoke session required pam_limits.so -session op...

...required pam_unix.so account sufficient pam_localuser.so account sufficient pam_succeed_if.so uid < 1000 quiet account [default=bad success=ok user_unknown=ignore] pam_sss.so account required pam_permit.so password requisite pam_pwquality.so try_first_pass local_users_only retry=3 authtok_type= password sufficient pam_unix.so sha512 shadow nullok try_first_pass use_authtok password sufficient pam_sss.so use_authtok password required pam_deny.so session optional pam_keyinit.so revoke session required pam_limits.so -session op...

Thanks a lot for looking over the config. I am at the topic "user data is available" id <username> and getent passwd and ldapsearch -x -b "ou=XXX,o=YYY" uid=<username> give the correct results ldapsearch gives also the correct host attribute i have set in the ldap server. Regarding the manpage of sssd.conf the lines access_provider = ldap ldap_access_order =

...??? pam_localuser.so > account???? sufficient??? pam_succeed_if.so uid < 1000 quiet > account???? [default=bad success=ok user_unknown=ignore] > pam_winbind.so cached_login > account???? required????? pam_permit.so > password??? requisite???? pam_pwquality.so try_first_pass > local_users_only retry=3 authtok_type= > password??? sufficient??? pam_unix.so sha512 shadow nullok > try_first_pass use_authtok > password??? sufficient??? pam_winbind.so use_authtok > password??? required????? pam_deny.so > session???? optional????? pam_keyinit.so revoke > session???? required?...

...try_first_pass account required pam_unix.so broken_shadow account sufficient pam_succeed_if.so uid < 2000 quiet account [default=bad success=ok user_unknown=ignore] pam_sss.so account required pam_permit.so password requisite pam_pwquality.so try_first_pass local_users_only retry=3 authtok_type= password sufficient pam_unix.so md5 shadow nullok try_first_pass use_authtok password sufficient pam_sss.so use_authtok password required pam_deny.so session optional pam_keyinit.so revoke session required pam_limits.so -session optio...