search for: local_t

...name Duration> static std::chrono::time_point<file_clock, Duration> from_sys(const std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock, Duration>& t) noexcept; template<typename Duration> static std::chrono::time_point<date::local_t, Duration> to_local(const std::chrono::time_point<file_clock, Duration>& t) noexcept; template<typename Duration> static std::chrono::time_point<file_clock, Duration> from_local(const std::chrono::time_point<date::local_t, Duratio...

Hi All, I recently committed <filesystem> to trunk. I wanted to bring attention to some quirks it currently has. First, it's been put in a separate library, libc++fs, for now. Users are responsible for linking the library when they use filesystem. Second, it should still not be considered ABI stable. Vendors should be aware of this before shipping it. Hopefully all the standard and

...: typedef struct { long counter; } atomic_long_t; Historically, counter has been declared volatile. This is now discouraged. -See Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt for the complete rationale. +See Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst for the complete rationale. local_t is very similar to atomic_t. If the counter is per CPU and only updated by one CPU, local_t is probably more appropriate. Please see diff --git a/Documentation/blockdev/ramdisk.txt b/Documentation/blockdev/ramdisk.txt index fe2ef978d85a..501e12e0323e 100644 --- a/Documentation/blockdev/ramdisk.txt...

...: typedef struct { long counter; } atomic_long_t; Historically, counter has been declared volatile. This is now discouraged. -See Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt for the complete rationale. +See Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst for the complete rationale. local_t is very similar to atomic_t. If the counter is per CPU and only updated by one CPU, local_t is probably more appropriate. Please see diff --git a/Documentation/blockdev/ramdisk.txt b/Documentation/blockdev/ramdisk.txt index fe2ef978d85a..501e12e0323e 100644 --- a/Documentation/blockdev/ramdisk.txt...

...: typedef struct { long counter; } atomic_long_t; Historically, counter has been declared volatile. This is now discouraged. -See Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt for the complete rationale. +See Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst for the complete rationale. local_t is very similar to atomic_t. If the counter is per CPU and only updated by one CPU, local_t is probably more appropriate. Please see diff --git a/Documentation/blockdev/ramdisk.txt b/Documentation/blockdev/ramdisk.txt index fe2ef978d85a..501e12e0323e 100644 --- a/Documentation/blockdev/ramdisk.txt...

...: typedef struct { long counter; } atomic_long_t; Historically, counter has been declared volatile. This is now discouraged. -See Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt for the complete rationale. +See Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst for the complete rationale. local_t is very similar to atomic_t. If the counter is per CPU and only updated by one CPU, local_t is probably more appropriate. Please see diff --git a/Documentation/blockdev/ramdisk.txt b/Documentation/blockdev/ramdisk.txt index fe2ef978d85a..501e12e0323e 100644 --- a/Documentation/blockdev/ramdisk.txt...