search for: local_dir

...ftp to get scp-like interfaces, or scp to > get all of the functionality of sftp, so the 'other' can die the ignominious > death it deserves. What's missing in sftp is a drop in replacement mode for copying to the remote server, i.e. this should work out of the box: $ sftp -rp local_dir server:path But, alas: ssh: Could not resolve hostname local_dir: Name or service not known If sftp had this mode, I would alias scp=sftp and be done with it. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed......

Hello everyone, I have tried to solve out the 'smb_trans2: invalid data' by 'unix extensions = no' as it was written in one of the previous mails. Still I have a bad problem: when I mount like this: mount.smbfs //server/service /local_dir -o username=my_remote_login,uid=my_local_login,gid=users,rw and then I try to copy a file to /local_dir as the user my_local_login, the file is copied ok but then it takes a looong time to go on (perhaps when changing the file's uid or attributes, or whatever...). Actually before I set ...

...the RH to Win2K box. I have copied required cygwin DLL's and rsync.exe,ssh-keygen.exe and ssh.exe. I set up my pub rsa id and all that stuff. My problem is here: I have a batch file which logs itself. The batch file contains some logging commands and rsync -avze ssh user@server:/directory/. /local_dir This command is executed fine at the command prompt. (Doesnt ask for password or passphrase as it is all setup.) when I execute this batch file thorugh the Win2K Task scheduler all the other commands in the batch file are executed except the above command. Dont know why. I have another job which...

I had a quick look for an answer to what I'd presume is a common Q but failed so wondering if somebody here would point me in the right direction, please & thanks?! I wish to use rsync to backup users' home dirs from machineA (Debian) to machineB (Fedora). I have a script, say backup.sh, in my own home dir and linked to from /etc/cron.daily and have set up the ssh keys so

Hi! I'm trying to create a filter file for rsync what saying which dirs to copy. For example i need only /lib and /var/lib dirs from remote server. I say: rsync -f ". /tmp/rsync_dirs" --dry-run --verbose "remote:/" "/local_dir/". File /tmp/rsync_dirs looks like: + /lib/ + /var/ -! /var/lib/* - /* This doesnt work: it copies all /var/ dir except contents of /var/lib/. What's wrong?

...bit of a problem - I have the feeling the solution is ridicolously trivial, and yet I can't find it! I have a remote repository of text files. Until today, I was the only one changing those files: I would simply change them locally, and update the remote repository with this command: cd local_dir rsync --delete -e ssh -Llavuz . merc@remote_server:remote_directory Now, things are more complicated because I am not the only person modifying those files stored in the remote server anymore. So, here is what I'd like to do: * Make sure that the remote respository is always the "good...

Damien, Reading the various articles about https://sintonen.fi/advisories/scp-client-multiple-vulnerabilities.txt have caused me to question the wisdom of using scp. Your observation: > Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:48:34 +1100 (AEDT) > From: Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> > Subject: Re: Status of SCP vulnerability > > "Don't use scp with untrusted

..., at 10:27, Ben Lindstrom <mouring at offwriting.org> wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen wrote on 1/24/19 6:28 AM: >> What's missing in sftp is a drop in replacement mode for copying to >> the remote server, i.e. this should work out of the box: >> >> $ sftp -rp local_dir server:path >> >> But, alas: >> >> ssh: Could not resolve hostname local_dir: Name or service not known >> >> If sftp had this mode, I would alias scp=sftp and be done with it. >> > If memory serves the argument was "if we are calling it an ft...

...any luck. It appears rsync is ignoring my --include option and outright excluding all CVS matches. I also tried using a file that is in the default list; this also failed. Here's the command I'm using: rsync --dry-run --include "/public_html/admin/test.exe" -C -avzub -e ssh <local_dir> <remote_dir> Is this a bug or a misunderstanding? I'm using rsync v2.6.3 on Debian Sarge. Thanks, William -- Knowmad Services Inc. http://www.knowmad.com

On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 01:31:00PM +0200, rsync-mail-gateway@nasbackup.com wrote: > rsync: read error: Connection reset by peer (104) This means the socket closed. Does rsync even get started on the remote system? That would be the first thing to investigate. If it is getting run, does the remote process crash or die? If you are connecting with a daemon process, you can look at the logs to

I need to verify some directories of backed up data versus restored data. What would you recommend as the type of comparison to do, and which tool would give the easiest/most usable output? Thanks! jlc

...equest from test.bscnet.com for / (/): no export entry Jan 12 08:35:09 gateway rpc.mountd: refused mount request from test.bscnet.com for / (/): no export entry What is meant by "no export entry"? to connect from either side, I use the command: mount.cifs //server_name/share_name /local_dir -o username=root,password=xxxx I assume the exports are the same as the ones in the smb.conf file, and besides, it works in one direction. The only difference between the working and failing hosts is that the working one is a PII 500 Mhz cpu, the failing one is a Pentium-MMX cpu. Lastly I'...

...ffer" task. The code is still fairly young and while some of it is pretty good, other bits show signs of being written in haste. I've tested it on a small number of scenarios so far, but nothing exhaustive. Commands accepted by the tool on stdin (* means not yet tested): cd REMOTE_DIR [LOCAL_DIR] chdir both sides at once tmpdir REMOTE_PATH [LOCAL_PATH] where temp-files go get REMOTE_FILE [LOCAL_FILE [BASIS_FILE]] rsync to the local system put LOCAL_FILE [REMOTE_FILE [BASIS_FILE]] rsync to the remote system mvget REMOTE_FILE [LOCAL_FILE [BASIS_FILE]] g...

Try as I might I can't seem to get LLVM to bulid using clang/clang++. No matter what I do it insists on using /usr/bin/cc and /usr/bin/c++ which are gcc. Am I missing something obvious? I vaguely remember some document describing a stage1 compiler built by your old toolchain and a stage2 compiler but I can't find the steps to do that any more. $ CC=/usr/local/bin/clang