search for: loc3

Dear Jim and Henrique, thank you both for your help. I have done this but run into another problem: ? In the example?below "loc1,loc2" occurs in the (now correct, thanks to your advice) "list" twice. ? ? trips=("loc1,loc2","loc2,loc3") ? DF$listoftrips=("loc1,loc2", "loc1,loc3", "loc2,loc3","loc1,loc2"). ? I?am now?using? ? DF$Data[match(trips,listoftrips)] to get Data associated with the trips listed in "trips". ? My problem is that multiple matches occur and match() see...

Dear list, ? I am using match() to match pairs of locations, e.g. trip="loc1,loc2" from a list of such pairs, e.g. list=("loc1,loc2", "loc1,loc3", "loc2,loc3","loc2,loc1"). ? In this example match() will match "trip" with the first element of "list", but not the 4th, because the order is reversed. ? How can I get a match with both ? ? Many thanks for any help, ? Juliane

...rame(Loc1) #creation of data frame Y Y.alleles <- c(1,4,6,8) Y.Freq <- c(0.35, 0.35, 0.10, 0.20 ) Loc2 <- cbind(Y.alleles, Y.Freq) Y <- data.frame (Loc2) # creation of data frame Z Z.alleles <- c(1,4,5,6,8) Z.Freq <- c(0.35, 0.35, 0.05, 0.05, 0.20) Loc3 <- cbind(Z.alleles, Z.Freq) Z <- data.frame (Loc3) X Y Z # I want to create a pair wise multiplication for all of the second columns of my dataframe X,Y and Z # Here is a way to get two of the data frames to create a pairwise multiplication. X.Freq_times_Y.Freq<- matr...

...following shorewall rules. This is only one part: ACCEPT    fw    net    tcp    80 ACCEPT    fw    net    udp    -    43,53,123,443,1024:65535 ACCEPT    loc    net    tcp    -    20,21,22,43,53,80,443,1024:65535 ACCEPT    loc2    net    tcp    -    20,21,22,43,53,80,443,1024:65535 ACCEPT    loc3    net    tcp    -    20,21,22,43,53,80,443,1024:65535 ACCEPT    fw    net    tcp    -    20,21,22,43,53,80,443,1024:65535 ACCEPT    loc    net    udp    -    43,53,123,443,1024:65535 ACCEPT    loc2    net    udp    -    43,53,123,443,1024:65535 ACCEPT    loc3    net    udp    -    43,53,123,44...

...on* getDifference(Location *a, Location *b) { Location* newLoc = (Location *)malloc(sizeof(Location)); newLoc->x = a->x - b->x; newLoc->y = a->y - b->y; return newLoc; } int main() { Location *loc1 = getNewLocation(0, 0); Location *loc2 = getNewLocation(1, 2); Location *loc3 = getDifference(loc1, loc2); free(loc1); free(loc2); free(loc3); return 0; } //------------=== End ===------------// The whole process: llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -O0 -c test.c -o test.bc opt test.bc -load libLLVMDataStructure.so -basic-aa -ds-aa -anders-aa -aa-eval -print-all-alias-modref-inf...

...;t know what's wrong with my data. Would you please help me on this. I am quite new to R. Thanks. > distancematrix <- as.matrix(read.table("test1.txt")) > distancematrix1 <- as.matrix(read.table("test2.txt")) > distancematrix1 Loc1 Loc2 Loc3 Loc4 Loc5 Loc6 Loc7 Loc8 Loc9 Loc10 Loc11 Loc12 Loc1 0.000 2293.8671 2180.7127 7563.934 2494.5049 2522.3946 5953.609 2511.5994 2047.683 4448.721 3180.844 3112.6798 Loc2 2293.867 0.0000 443.2497 9831.220 472.2009 397.4316 8213.580 1114.912...

...trix(5:ncol(List.elements), byrow=TRUE, ncol=2) Loc2.gamete.counts<- apply(L2.pairwise.columns , 1, function(.row){ paste(List.elements[,3:4], List.elements[,.row]) }) #Locus3 L3.pairwise.columns <- matrix(7:ncol(List.elements), byrow=TRUE, ncol=2) Loc3.gamete.counts<- apply(L3.pairwise.columns , 1, function(.row){ paste(List.elements[,5:6], List.elements[,.row]) }) ##Creation of the List Gamete.pairs<-cbind(Loc1.gamete.counts,Loc2.gamete.counts,Loc3.gamete.counts ) Gamete.pairs Gamete.list<-list...

...t is possible in R. I have a data frame that looks as follows (this is just mockup data). df location,"species1","species2","species3","species4","species5" "loc1",0.44,0.28,0.37,-0.24,0.41 "loc2",0.54,0.62,0.34,0.52,0.71 "loc3",-0.33,0.75,-0.34,0.48,0.61 location is a factor while all the species are numerical vectors. I would like to present this as a table (or something that looks like a table) but instead of the numbers I would like to present circles (pch = 19) that increases in size with increasing number. Is...

I've created a bunch of postscript trees (post.rpart), which I subsequently edit in Adobe Acrobat 4.05 (I need additional labelling that isn't easy to add with R). After editing the labels and annotations using Acrobat, I then export the file to Adobe's .eps format so I can insert the picture into a Microsoft Word 2000 document. The .pdf file distilled from the .ps file is

Hi all, I am trying to get bootstrap resampled estimates of covariates in a Cox model using cph (Design library). Using the following I get the error: > ddist2.abr <- datadist(data2.abr) > options(datadist='ddist2.abr') > cph1.abr <- cph(Surv(strt3.abr,loc3.abr)~cov.a.abr+cov.b.abr, data=data2.abr, x=T, y=T) > boot.cph1 <- bootcov(cph1.abr, B=100, coef.reps=TRUE, pr=T) 1 Error in oosl(f, matxv(X, cof), Y) : not implemented for cph models > Removing coef.reps argument works fine, but I really need the coefficients if at all possible. I cant...

...rame(Loc1) #creation of data frame Y Y.alleles <- c(1,4,6,8) Y.Freq <- c(0.35, 0.35, 0.10, 0.20 ) Loc2 <- cbind(Y.alleles, Y.Freq) Y <- data.frame (Loc2) # creation of data frame Z Z.alleles <- c(1,4,5,6,8) Z.Freq <- c(0.35, 0.35, 0.05, 0.05, 0.20) Loc3 <- cbind(Z.alleles, Z.Freq) Z <- data.frame (Loc3) X Y Z # I want to create a pair wise multiplication for all of the second columns of my dataframe X,Y and Z # Here is a way to get two of the data frames to create a pairwise multiplication. X.Freq_times_Y.Freq<- matr...

Hi there: I am new to R and creating a boxplot panel chart to show a test result. I have four output variables (OV1, OV2, OV3, OV4) reflecting effects of the variation of three status parameters (SP1, SP2, SP3) on them at three different locations (Loc1, Loc2, Loc3). My plan is that displaying ONE OV change with ONE SP over three Loc in each boxplot (i.e., Loc is X axis and OV value is Y axis). Because there are three SP, I may need total of 12 boxplots to show the changes of OVs with SPs. However, I met a problem when I used the following R code: p1 <-...

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

Hi. This patchset implements xen/ia64 domU support. Qing He and Eddie Dong also has been woring on pv_ops so that I want to discuss before going further and avoid duplicated work. I suppose that Eddie will also post his own patch. So reviewing both patches, we can reach to better pv_ops interface. - I didn't changed the ia64 intrinsic paravirtulization abi from the last post. Presumably it

Hi. This patchset implements xen/ia64 domU support. Qing He and Eddie Dong also has been woring on pv_ops so that I want to discuss before going further and avoid duplicated work. I suppose that Eddie will also post his own patch. So reviewing both patches, we can reach to better pv_ops interface. - I didn't changed the ia64 intrinsic paravirtulization abi from the last post. Presumably it

Hi. The patch I send before was too large so that it was dropped from the maling list. I'm sending again with smaller size. This patch set is the xen paravirtualization of hand written assenbly code. And I expect that much clean up is necessary before merge. We really need the feed back before starting actual clean up as Eddie already said before. Eddie discussed how to clean up and suggested

Hi. The patch I send before was too large so that it was dropped from the maling list. I'm sending again with smaller size. This patch set is the xen paravirtualization of hand written assenbly code. And I expect that much clean up is necessary before merge. We really need the feed back before starting actual clean up as Eddie already said before. Eddie discussed how to clean up and suggested