search for: loaner

...200,000 failed attempts to connect to a share EVERY DAY. For example, in the logs shown below, a video encoding station "encoder-pc1" is trying to connect to a Samba share called "tx-masters_". However, the share is actually called "tx-masters_1". Nov 7 18:00:55 loaner-1 smbd[2851]: [2010/11/07 18:00:55, 0] smbd/service.c:1188(make_connection) Nov 7 18:00:55 loaner-1 smbd[2851]: encoder-pc1 (::ffff:192.168.10.101) couldn't find service tx-masters_ Nov 7 18:00:55 loaner-1 smbd[2851]: [2010/11/07 18:00:55, 0] smbd/service.c:1188(make_connection) Nov 7...

...the next version that I had downloaded 4.3.3. With this I was able to successfully join the domain. I am thinking to: 1) seize roles with samba 3.3 server 2) shutdown 2003 server 3) join domain with samba 4.10 server 4) transfer roles to samba 4.10 server 5) demote samba 3.3 server (this PC is a loaner) Is there any benefit in walking up the versions from 3.3 to 4.8.x before seizing the roles? When you say "walk up the versions", do you mean 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8? Cheers Russell -----Original Message----- From: Rowland penny [mailto:rpenny at samba.org] Sent: Friday, 31 May, 201...

...ain with samba 4.10 server I wouldn't do that, there was a bug that left you with a non-operating DC This is where I would 'walk' up the minor versions 4.3.3 -> 4.7.x -> 4.8.x -> 4.10.x > 4) transfer roles to samba 4.10 server > 5) demote samba 3.3 server (this PC is a loaner) > > Is there any benefit in walking up the versions from 3.3 to 4.8.x before seizing the roles? > > When you say "walk up the versions", do you mean 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8? I hope my explanation above answers those questions. Rowland > > Cheers > Russell > &gt...

...#39;t do that, there was a bug that left you with a non-operating > DC > > This is where I would 'walk' up the minor versions 4.3.3 -> 4.7.x -> > 4.8.x -> 4.10.x > > > 4) transfer roles to samba 4.10 server > > 5) demote samba 3.3 server (this PC is a loaner) > > > > Is there any benefit in walking up the versions from 3.3 to > 4.8.x before seizing the roles? > > > > When you say "walk up the versions", do you mean 4.4, 4.5, > 4.6, 4.7, 4.8? > > I hope my explanation above answers those questions. > &g...

Hi All, I'd be interested in your opinions of the book "Introductory Statistics with R" by Peter Dalgaard Does it well describe the R object concept, the language itself and statistical aspects (I am not a statistician)? thanks for your opinion, Arne

Hello, I'm looking forward to mining some new data six ways from Sunday with a great looking R application named "rattle". May I please have the benefit of this list's informed thoughts on how to debug an installation error? On Debian Linux's unstable release, I've done root$ aptitude install r-cran-rattle root$ aptitude install r-cran-rgtk2 user$ R

It's been hours since I've seen a post from this list Must be broken again. Regards Greg Cirino ___________________________________ Cirelle Enterprises Inc. 603-425-2221 www.cirelle.com Web Application Development & Design www.cirelle.net ProSpeed High Speed Dial-up - 6 Times Faster www.cedata.com Web, FTP, Email Hosting Services www.mlsbot.com NNEREN MLS IDX Services When You

I have been successfully been using R on my EEE PC for some while now. Although it uses Xandros I have been able to install various pieces of software by pretending that it was Debian etch. Johannes was kind enough to continue providing binaries on CRAN for a while but I think I am the only person still living in the past as CRAN etch is currently stuck at 2.11.0 and I cannot rely on him to

...th a > non-operating > > DC > > > > This is where I would 'walk' up the minor versions 4.3.3 -> > 4.7.x -> > > 4.8.x -> 4.10.x > > > > > 4) transfer roles to samba 4.10 server > > > 5) demote samba 3.3 server (this PC is a loaner) > > > > > > Is there any benefit in walking up the versions from 3.3 to > > 4.8.x before seizing the roles? > > > > > > When you say "walk up the versions", do you mean 4.4, 4.5, > > 4.6, 4.7, 4.8? > > > > I hope my explanation...

Is my understanding correct that the body() function currently can't return a function's body intact, in order, and as characters ready for editing? My testing and reading of body()'s help indicate that it can not. Here's what I'm seeing. Consider pasting 1+ and a function containing x^2 together to get 1+x^2 As you can see below, body() reports three

...g into the Altigen box that I've got at work via h.323. But my first goal is to get any of my devices to talk to Asterisk, which so far I've been unable to do. Hardware in-hand consists of a K6-2 based 2.6 kernel Gentoo box, two Selsius 30 VIP phones, a couple of Selsius 12SP+'s, a loaner Altigen IP-600 (which is nothing like a Polycom IP600, despite the name), and a switched 100 megabit network. There's an X100P on order which should be here real soon now, which will be sharing the house's solitary CO line with a Uniden cordless phone until I get an FXS interface of so...

Hello! In my relentless quest for knowledge, I pose this question: who's got the biggest dialplans, and how big are these monsters? What's the biggest dialplan in use right now? If you feel you are a competitor, let me know how many contexts/extensions/priorities you are dealing with. Maybe the context with the most extensions, the extension with the most priorities would be