search for: loadpolly

...which was the other half for the gnutls fix. > > Can you check if the IR file specifies a target triple which doesn't > match the current platform? > > -Eli Eli, The polly testsuite only has a single file for CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll which has... ; RUN: opt %loadPolly %defaultOpts -polly-cloog -analyze %s | FileCheck %s ; RUN: opt %loadPolly %defaultOpts %s | lli %EatErrOnX86 ; RUN: opt %loadPolly %defaultOpts -polly-codegen %s | lli %EatErrOnX86 ; ModuleID = 'single_do_loop_scev_replace.s' target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i...

...fix. >> >> Can you check if the IR file specifies a target triple which doesn't >> match the current platform? >> >> -Eli > > Eli, > The polly testsuite only has a single file for CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll which has... > > ; RUN: opt %loadPolly %defaultOpts -polly-cloog -analyze %s | FileCheck %s > ; RUN: opt %loadPolly %defaultOpts %s | lli %EatErrOnX86 > ; RUN: opt %loadPolly %defaultOpts -polly-codegen %s | lli %EatErrOnX86 > ; ModuleID = 'single_do_loop_scev_replace.s' > target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:...

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:43:42PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jack Howarth

...Jack -------------- next part -------------- Index: test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll =================================================================== --- test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (revision 182998) +++ test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (working copy) @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ ; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-codegen-isl -polly-codegen-scev %s ; -polly-independent causes: Cannot generate independent blocks ; -; XFAIL:* target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64" tar...

...t; Index: test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll > > =================================================================== > > --- test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (revision 182998) > > +++ test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (working copy) > > @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ > > ; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-codegen-isl -polly-codegen-scev %s > > ; -polly-independent causes: Cannot generate independent blocks > > ; > > -; XFAIL:* > > target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:...

...en-1.ll >>>> =================================================================== >>>> --- test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (revision 182998) >>>> +++ test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (working copy) >>>> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ >>>> ; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-codegen-isl -polly-codegen-scev %s >>>> ; -polly-independent causes: Cannot generate independent blocks >>>> ; >>>> -; XFAIL:* >>>> target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64...

...>> >> The patch is attached. > > The patch includes only one test case. I also have some tiny last comments > inline. Otherwise the patch looks good. > >> +++ test/ScopInfo/simple_nonaffine_loop_exfail.ll     (revision 0) >> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ >> +; RUN: opt %loadPolly %defaultOpts -polly-scops -analyze %s | >> FileCheck %s >> +; XFAIL: * > > Why is this one still XFAIL? I wanted to add a test case that in case of a "missing the flag" at command line confirmed the functionality was actually disabled (and this is the reason of the XFAI...

...is attached. >> >> The patch includes only one test case. I also have some tiny last comments >> inline. Otherwise the patch looks good. >> >>> +++ test/ScopInfo/simple_nonaffine_loop_exfail.ll (revision 0) >>> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ >>> +; RUN: opt %loadPolly %defaultOpts -polly-scops -analyze %s | >>> FileCheck %s >>> +; XFAIL: * >> >> Why is this one still XFAIL? > > I wanted to add a test case that in case of a "missing the flag" at > command line confirmed the functionality was actually disabled (and...

...gt; Jack > Index: test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll > =================================================================== > --- test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (revision 182998) > +++ test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (working copy) > @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ > ; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-codegen-isl -polly-codegen-scev %s > ; -polly-independent causes: Cannot generate independent blocks > ; > -; XFAIL:* > target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8...

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:43:42PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > >> > While testing llvm/polly svn on

...=========================================================== >>>>>> --- test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (revision 182998) >>>>>> +++ test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (working copy) >>>>>> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ >>>>>> ; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-codegen-isl -polly-codegen-scev %s >>>>>> ; -polly-independent causes: Cannot generate independent blocks >>>>>> ; >>>>>> -; XFAIL:* >>>>>> target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:3...

...n/scevcodegen-1.ll > > > =================================================================== > > > --- test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (revision 182998) > > > +++ test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (working copy) > > > @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ > > > ; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-codegen-isl -polly-codegen-scev %s > > > ; -polly-independent causes: Cannot generate independent blocks > > > ; > > > -; XFAIL:* > > > target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128...

...>> =================================================================== >>>>> --- test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (revision 182998) >>>>> +++ test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (working copy) >>>>> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ >>>>> ; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-codegen-isl -polly-codegen-scev %s >>>>> ; -polly-independent causes: Cannot generate independent blocks >>>>> ; >>>>> -; XFAIL:* >>>>> target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:...

...======================= > >>>>>>> --- test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (revision 182998) > >>>>>>> +++ test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (working copy) > >>>>>>> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ > >>>>>>> ; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-codegen-isl -polly-codegen-scev %s > >>>>>>> ; -polly-independent causes: Cannot generate independent blocks > >>>>>>> ; > >>>>>>> -; XFAIL:* > >>>>>>> target datalayout = "e-p:64:64...

...=========================================== >>>>>>> --- test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (revision 182998) >>>>>>> +++ test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (working copy) >>>>>>> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ >>>>>>> ; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-codegen-isl -polly-codegen-scev %s >>>>>>> ; -polly-independent causes: Cannot generate independent blocks >>>>>>> ; >>>>>>> -; XFAIL:* >>>>>>> target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i1...

...========== >>>>>>>>> --- test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (revision 182998) >>>>>>>>> +++ test/Isl/CodeGen/scevcodegen-1.ll (working copy) >>>>>>>>> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ >>>>>>>>> ; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-codegen-isl -polly-codegen-scev %s >>>>>>>>> ; -polly-independent causes: Cannot generate independent blocks >>>>>>>>> ; >>>>>>>>> -; XFAIL:* >>>>>>>>> target datalayout =...

...verifies that the code is generated. > > The patch is attached. The patch includes only one test case. I also have some tiny last comments inline. Otherwise the patch looks good. > +++ test/ScopInfo/simple_nonaffine_loop_exfail.ll (revision 0) > @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ > +; RUN: opt %loadPolly %defaultOpts -polly-scops -analyze %s | > FileCheck %s > +; XFAIL: * Why is this one still XFAIL? > Index: lib/Analysis/ScopInfo.cpp > =================================================================== > --- lib/Analysis/ScopInfo.cpp (revision 144978) > +++ lib/Analysis/ScopI...

...e patch includes only one test case. I also have some tiny last >>> comments >>> inline. Otherwise the patch looks good. >>> >>>> +++ test/ScopInfo/simple_nonaffine_loop_exfail.ll     (revision 0) >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ >>>> +; RUN: opt %loadPolly %defaultOpts -polly-scops -analyze %s | >>>> FileCheck %s >>>> +; XFAIL: * >>> >>> Why is this one still XFAIL? >> >> I wanted to add a test case that in case of a "missing the flag" at >> command line confirmed the functionality...

2011/11/15 Marcello Maggioni <hayarms at gmail.com>: > 2011/11/14 Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es>: >> On 11/14/2011 02:45 PM, Marcello Maggioni wrote: >>> >>> 2011/11/14 Tobias Grosser<tobias at grosser.es>: >>>> >>>> On 11/14/2011 01:24 AM, Marcello Maggioni wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Tobias.

...>> >> The patch is attached. > > The patch includes only one test case. I also have some tiny last comments > inline. Otherwise the patch looks good. > >> +++ test/ScopInfo/simple_nonaffine_loop_exfail.ll ? ? (revision 0) >> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ >> +; RUN: opt %loadPolly %defaultOpts -polly-scops -analyze %s | >> FileCheck %s >> +; XFAIL: * > > Why is this one still XFAIL? I wanted to add a test case that in case of a "missing the flag" at command line confirmed the functionality was actually disabled (and this is the reason of the XFAI...