search for: loadextactions

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "loadextactions".

2010 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] v16i32/v16f32
I tried adding them in my backend however I run into the assertion assert((unsigned)VT.SimpleTy < sizeof(LoadExtActions[0])*4 && ExtType < array_lengthof(LoadExtActions) && "Table isn't big enough!"); What does the assertion mean ? thanks for all help!! shrey On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed,...
2010 Jul 17
0
[LLVMdev] v16i32/v16f32
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:14 PM, shreyas krishnan <shreyas76 at gmail.com> wrote: > I tried adding them in my backend however I run into the assertion > >  assert((unsigned)VT.SimpleTy < sizeof(LoadExtActions[0])*4 && >           ExtType < array_lengthof(LoadExtActions) && >           "Table isn't big enough!"); > > What does the assertion mean ? That means you forgot to bump up LAST_VALUETYPE. -Eli
2010 Jul 15
2
[LLVMdev] v16i32/v16f32
Hi I find types such as v16i32, v16f32 missing in my llvm version 2.7 So does the following page not list them http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1MVT.html is that intentional for any reason or can I just add them ? thanks shrey
2010 Jul 15
0
[LLVMdev] v16i32/v16f32
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:48 PM, shreyas krishnan <shreyas76 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi >   I find  types such as v16i32, v16f32  missing in my llvm version 2.7 > > So does the following page not list them > http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1MVT.html > > is that intentional for any reason or can I just add them  ? As far as I know, they're not there
2010 Jul 17
1
[LLVMdev] v16i32/v16f32
...2010 at 5:20 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:14 PM, shreyas krishnan <shreyas76 at gmail.com> wrote: >> I tried adding them in my backend however I run into the assertion >> >>  assert((unsigned)VT.SimpleTy < sizeof(LoadExtActions[0])*4 && >>           ExtType < array_lengthof(LoadExtActions) && >>           "Table isn't big enough!"); >> >> What does the assertion mean ? > > That means you forgot to bump up LAST_VALUETYPE. > > -Eli >