search for: loadable_modules

Hi everyone, I am wondering if there is any variable in LLVM's cmake configuration which is equivalent to LOADABLE_MODULE in LLVM's Makefile configuration. I would like to build some loadable modules for opt and I could successfully do that with Makefiles but not with CMakeLists.txt files. Thanks, Sean -- Sean Lee PhD Student Programming Language and Systems Research Group School of

Michael, I've implemented a LOADABLE_MODULE feature in the makefiles: http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20050110/023147.html The approach taken is almost what you described below. However, I want to retain the distinction between a "regular" shared library and one that can be dlopened. So, if you specify SHARED_LIBRARY=1 you get a regular shared library

Hi all, I'm trying to use the PPL (Parma Polyhedra Library, bugseng.com/products/ppl) in one of my LLVM passes getting the error: > Error opening > '/home/jorge/SvnReps/Systems/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/MyAnalysis.so': > /home/jorge/SvnReps/Systems/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/MyAnalysis.so: > undefined symbol: _ZNK23Parma_Polyhedra_Library13PIP_Tree_Node2OKEv >

On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 10:11:25 (+0100), Duncan Sands wrote: >> Hi Jorge, >> >> > I'm trying to use the PPL (Parma Polyhedra Library, >> > bugseng.com/products/ppl) in one of my LLVM passes getting the error: >> > >> >> Error opening >> >> '/home/jorge/SvnReps/Systems/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/MyAnalysis.so':

Hi Jorge, > I'm trying to use the PPL (Parma Polyhedra Library, > bugseng.com/products/ppl) in one of my LLVM passes getting the error: > >> Error opening >> '/home/jorge/SvnReps/Systems/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/MyAnalysis.so': >> /home/jorge/SvnReps/Systems/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/MyAnalysis.so: >> undefined symbol:

Yep, it sounds like a good solution, and it works for me - thanks! -mike On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:40:34 -0800, Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Michael, > > I've implemented a LOADABLE_MODULE feature in the makefiles: > > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20050110/023147.html > > The approach taken is almost what you described

Hi guys, I am writing a LLVM pass plugin, and just simply add a directory mypass into llvm/lib/Transforms. But since I don't hope this directory to contain too many source files, I add some subdirectories. For instance, there are 2 files inside *mypass/sub: basic.h, basic.cpp. Here is the structure of the directory llvm/lib/Transforms/mypass $tree mypass mypass ├── Makefile ├──

Hi ! Here is the situation. I created a pass in lib/Transforms/Obfuscation. I added a createFlattening() in IPO.h and in my code to be able to use it in PassManagerBuilder.cpp (lib/Transforms/IPO) in the method PopulateModulePassManager() so I can add my pass to standard passes. It all works if I add all my files in the lib/Transforms/IPO directory. But I want to keep them away in the

Hi I have just written an pass which does some simple ASAP scheduling. First i registered it as optimization pass because it so nice documented and speeds up the compilation and testing times dramaticly :-). Then i just registered this part as an analysis part which should be used in a modified cbackend. All seems to work fine, exept that llc fails to link. I tried removing the

Good summer, all! This patch enables ENABLE_SHARED=1 to build DLL based LLVM toolchain. I have checked this on Cygwin-1.5, Cygwin-1.7, mingw(msysgit) and mingw-cross-fedora12. I can separate this patch into some parts; cleanups, adding definitions and adding rules. Any feedbacks are welcome. Have fun! ...Takumi * Pros - reduction of linking time of toolchain. - capability of -load

When I tried this a while back, the .so file wasn't being built on Mac OS X. Now it looks like it is. I got dynamic loading to work following the instructions in http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/ WritingAnLLVMPass.html. However, there was a typo in the instructions (it should say LOADABLE_MODULE = 1), and I fixed that and committed it. I also fixed the sample/lib/sample Makefile to

Hello LLVM, I am following the document "Writing an LLVM Pass". When I ran "opt -load ../../../Debug/lib/MyPass.so -mypass < hello.bc > /dev/null" I got the next error: ***@ubuntu:~/test$ opt -load ../../llvm/Debug/lib/MyPass.so -mypass < hello.bc > /dev/null opt: Pass.cpp:159: void<unnamed>::PassRegistrar::RegisterPass(const llvm::PassInfo&): Assertion

Thanks a lot. A see the shared library in linux version. I initially tried doing this in cygwin where I dont see the shared library being built. Do u think it could have been cygwin that is the problem? Aparna On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Milos Puzovic <milos.puzovic at gmail.com>wrote: > In order to generate shared libraries you need to have SHARED_LIBRARY > and

Good evening, Michael. 2010/9/5 Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com>: > Do you know what the exact problem is? It would be best to fix the > Makefile instead of moving it. And sense it is a transformation, the > build system is broken if you _have_ to move it. I am sorry, I don't understand what *the exact problem" is. I can describe facts; - Hello is the only

Hello all, Is it well known that building LLVM with --enable-optimized causes RegisterPass calls to be removed from dynamically loadable libraries (i.e., those built with LOADABLE_MODULE=1)? For example, here's what happens to the Hello pass (ToT on Darwin, both with and without --enable-optimized): $ pwd /Users/ransford/llvm/lib/Transforms/Hello $ nm -j Release+Asserts/Hello.o | c++filt -p

i am beginner in llvm compiler framework. As i want to create loop pass i went through all the procedure for creating new pass. I did all the steps u mentioned but when i copied the content of makefile(for hello pass) from ur website to my makefile its not working properly. My makefile is like this : # Makefile for hello pass # Path to top level of LLVM hierarchyLEVEL = ../../.. # Name of the

..._FD_LEAKS [ ] 5. LOW_MEMORY [*] 6. MALLOC_DEBUG [ ] 7. RADIO_RELAX [ ] 8. STATIC_BUILD [ ] 9. IAX_OLD_FIND [*] 10. LOADABLE_MODULES Do this options make asterisk consume much more CPU? My feeling is that asterisk is consuming an average of 30% more CPU than before. I'm doing this because the last upgrade to 1.4.23.1 was no good for me in terms of overall stability, so if this time it core dumps again or something I can...

hello... I have finish my backend. But I dont know how to install my backend... llc -load=???Load what?? Can anyone teach me? thanx.

On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, s88 wrote: > hello... > I have finish my backend. But I dont know how to install my backend... > llc -load=???Load what?? > Can anyone teach me? > thanx. There are two ways to do this. You can either link the backend directly into llc (like the X86 or PowerPC backends, see tools/llc/Makefile), or you can dynamically load the backend. To dynamically load

In order to generate shared libraries you need to have SHARED_LIBRARY and LOADABLE_MODULE defined in the Makefile. See here for more details: http://llvm.org/docs/MakefileGuide.html#libraries On 13 Apr 2009, at 20:46, aparna kotha wrote: > I am trying to run the LLVM hello world pass. I observe that in the > OUPUT_DIR/lib the LLVMHello.a and LLVMHello.la libraries are >