Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "lo2".
Did you mean:
lo
2012 Sep 07
3
error: in catg (xi, name=nam, label=lab): "LO2" has <2 category levels
Dear R-users,
During a fit procedure in a Logistic prediction model I encounter the
following problem:
error: in catg (xi, name=nam, label=lab: X has <2 category levels
The following code is used:
fit <-lrm(MRI_Diag_RC ~ factor(O4_1r) + N6_1r + leeftijd + LO1 + LO2 + LO3+
LO4+ LO5+ LO6+ LO7+ LO8+ LO9+ LO10+ LO11+ LO12+ LO13 + LO14+ LO15+ LO16+
LO17+ LO18+ LO19+ LO20+ LO21+ LO22+ LO23+ LO24 + LO26+ LO27 + LO29, model=T,
x=T, y=T, data=dat)
Most predictors are (dichotomous) nominal variables as is the problematic
"LO2". Does anyone know what the prob...
2009 Dec 01
4
[LLVMdev] Possible bug in ExpandShiftWithUnknownAmountBit
...(N->getOperand(0), InL, InH);
SDValue NVBitsNode = DAG.getConstant(NVTBits, ShTy);
SDValue Amt2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, dl, ShTy, NVBitsNode, Amt);
SDValue Cmp = DAG.getSetCC(dl, TLI.getSetCCResultType(ShTy),
Amt, NVBitsNode, ISD::SETULT);
SDValue Lo1, Hi1, Lo2, Hi2;
switch (N->getOpcode()) {
default: llvm_unreachable("Unknown shift");
case ISD::SHL:
// ShAmt < NVTBits
Lo1 = DAG.getConstant(0, NVT); // Low part is zero.
Hi1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, dl, NVT, InL, Amt); // High part from Lo
part.
// ShA...
2009 Dec 01
0
[LLVMdev] Possible bug in ExpandShiftWithUnknownAmountBit
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Javier Martinez <javier at jmartinez.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working in adding support for 64-bit integers to my target. I'm using
> LLVM to decompose the 64-bit integer operations by using 32-bit registers
> wherever possible and emulating support where not. When looking at the bit
> shift decomposition I saw what seems to be a
2006 Jul 07
0
User Error (was LOESS (PR#9064))
Please do as we ask (repeatedly) and study the help page before posting.
'family' is a separate argument, not part of loess.control, as the help
page correctly documents. If you use
cars.lo2 <- loess(dist ~ speed, cars, family = "symmetric",
control = loess.control(surface = "direct", iterations = 20))
cars.lo2$pars$iterations
it prints *20*, as it is documented to do.
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, lamp at few.eur.nl wrote:
> Dear Mr Ripley,
> Thank you for y...
2012 Sep 03
0
[LLVMdev] branch on vector compare?
...act for your case you could do something similar:
%lo1 = shufflevector <4 x i1> %16, <4 x i1> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1>
%hi1 = shufflevector <4 x i1> %16, <4 x i1> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 2, i32 3>
%join = or <2 x i1> %lo1, %hi1
%lo2 = extractelement <2 x i1> %join, i32 0
%hi2 = extractelement <2 x i1> %join, i32 1
%final = or i1 %lo2, %hi2
Currently I would expect the code generators to produce something nasty for
this. Feel free to open a bugreport requesting that the code generators do
something better.
C...
2006 May 08
1
ob.step$anova interpretation
...factor(jeo) + as.factor(eg) + as.factor(ys) + as.factor(yy) +
as.factor(ak)
Final Model:
res ~ as.factor(jeo) + as.factor(eg) + as.factor(ys) + as.factor(yy) +
as.factor(ak)
Step Df Deviance Resid. Df Resid. Dev AIC
1 788 30604.46 31588.77
~~~~~~~~~~
> lo2.step$anova
Stepwise Model Path
Analysis of Deviance Table
Initial Model:
res ~ as.factor(jeo):as.factor(eg) + as.factor(ys) + as.factor(yy) +
as.factor(ak)
Final Model:
res ~ as.factor(ys) + as.factor(yy) + as.factor(ak)
Step Df Deviance Resid. Df Resid. Dev...
2012 Sep 02
2
[LLVMdev] branch on vector compare?
Hi all, llvm newbie here.
I'm trying to branch based on a vector compare. I've found a slow way (below)
which goes through memory. Is there some idiom I'm missing so that it would use
for instance movmsk for SSE or vcmpgt & cr6 for altivec?
Or do I need to resort to calling the intrinsic directly?
Thanks,
Stephen.
%16 = fcmp ogt <4 x float> %15, %cr
%17 =
2009 May 06
1
Add trend line to XYPlot using a subset of the original data
...ck=.02,log="y",yaxs='i',xaxs='i',mgp=c(3,.5,0))
lines(pkdat$WY[pck],exp(predict.lm(lm(log(pkdat$X9444500[pck])~pkdat$WY[pck]))),col=3)
pkyr<-pkdat$WY[pck]>1927
lines(pkdat$WY[pck][pkyr],exp(predict.lm(lm(log(pkdat$X9444500[pck][pkyr])~pkdat$WY[pck][pkyr]))),col=2)
my.lo2<-loess(log(pkdat$X9444500[pck])~pkdat$WY[pck],span=.7,degree=1)
lines(pkdat$WY[pck],exp(predict(my.lo2)),col=6)
I would like to use the xyplot command though because of other graphics
control options and other similar graphs for the same project that were
created using xyplot.
Any suggestions...
2003 Dec 19
6
Configuring JAIL to bind on lo0 interface
Hello,
I have configured jail for users with sshd ftpd and auth. I started this
jail on IP 127.0.0.10(there is an alias on lo0 interface), there was
not any bigger problem to start it. But i have a problem with internet in
this jail. I can log in to this jail through ssh or ftpd but i can't
connect to the internet. I try to set up some kind of nat but it doesn't
work.
Can anybody help me
2009 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
> Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass?
> I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would
> mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction
> and just deleting code for handling its Expand and Promote. Are you
> anticipating something more
2009 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On May 20, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Eli Friedman
> <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Per subject, this patch adding an additional pass to handle vector
>>
>> operations; the idea is that this allows removing the code from
>>
>> LegalizeDAG that handles illegal types, which should be a significant
2009 May 21
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
...ExpandOp(RHS, RHSLo, RHSHi);
- ISD::CondCode CCCode = cast<CondCodeSDNode>(CC)->get();
-
- if (VT==MVT::ppcf128) {
- // FIXME: This generated code sucks. We want to generate
- // FCMPU crN, hi1, hi2
- // BNE crN, L:
- // FCMPU crN, lo1, lo2
- // The following can be improved, but not that much.
- Tmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(dl, TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi.getValueType()),
- LHSHi, RHSHi, ISD::SETOEQ);
- Tmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(dl, TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSLo.getValueType()),
- LHS...
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking