search for: lo1

...dedInteger(N->getOperand(0), InL, InH); SDValue NVBitsNode = DAG.getConstant(NVTBits, ShTy); SDValue Amt2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, dl, ShTy, NVBitsNode, Amt); SDValue Cmp = DAG.getSetCC(dl, TLI.getSetCCResultType(ShTy), Amt, NVBitsNode, ISD::SETULT); SDValue Lo1, Hi1, Lo2, Hi2; switch (N->getOpcode()) { default: llvm_unreachable("Unknown shift"); case ISD::SHL: // ShAmt < NVTBits Lo1 = DAG.getConstant(0, NVT); // Low part is zero. Hi1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, dl, NVT, InL, Amt); // High part from Lo part....

...e who don't: jails are like virtual machines but actually they aren't. I want to serve IPv4 subnets 10.1.0.0/16 (machine A) and 10.2.0.0/16 (machine B), and IPv6 subnets fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1::/96 (machine A) and fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2::/96 (machine B) respectively. The jails are connected on lo1. A $ netstat -rn | grep -e 'fd16' -e '10\.' 10.0.0.0/8 link#4 U tap0 10.1.0.1 link#4 UHS lo0 10.1.1.1 link#3 UH lo1 10.2.0.0/16 10.1.0.1 UGS tap0...

Un texte encapsul? et encod? dans un jeu de caract?res inconnu a ?t? nettoy?... Nom : non disponible Url : https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20060613/98f7694a/attachment.pl

...ere z = (x-xi)/h, where h is the the number of neighboring values within the bandwidth. Assuming that's correct, here is my code (for the first observation in x1: x1 <- 1:156 # x set.seed(123) y <- arima.sim(list(order=c(2,0,0), ar=c(1,-.1)), n=156) # randomly generated y lo1 <- loess(y ~ x1, span=0.4) # loess smoother for y ~ x df <- lo1$one.delta # estimated df from r wconstant <- summary(lo1)[17]$weights # set weight; otherwise 1 (as in this case) res <- residuals(lo1) # y-yhat ss <- sum(wconstant *res^2) s <- sqrt(ss/df)...

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Javier Martinez <javier at jmartinez.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working in adding support for 64-bit integers to my target. I'm using > LLVM to decompose the 64-bit integer operations by using 32-bit registers > wherever possible and emulating support where not. When looking at the bit > shift decomposition I saw what seems to be a

Hi all, Is it mandatory to add device mem to jails to enable network via the gateway? Left ezjail with FreeBSD-6.3 (and a hardware replacement of my server) and am now starting again with FreeBSD-7.1. Early this week, I upgraded from 7.0 to 7.1 (not having 'used' jails on 7.0). After creating the jail with `ezjail-admin update -i` I created a 'ports build' jail `ezjail-admin

...eth3 - ppp0 eth4 - ppp1 eth4 - Here a copy of the route and ip route: emeraude:/etc/shorewall# route Table de routage IP du noyau Destination Passerelle Genmask Indic Metric Ref Use Iface lo1-lns101-tip- * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0 1.240.101-84.re * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp1 192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.18.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0...

...t;- aov(log(Days + 2.5) ~ .^4, quine) quine.nxt <- update(quine.hi, . ~ . - Eth:Sex:Age:Lrn) quine.lo <- aov(log(Days+2.5) ~ 1, quine) anova(quine.hi, quine.nxt, quine.lo) quine.hi1 <- glm(log(Days + 2.5) ~ .^4, data=quine) quine.nxt1 <- update(quine.hi1, . ~ . - Eth:Sex:Age:Lrn) quine.lo1 <- glm(log(Days+2.5) ~ 1, data=quine) anova(quine.hi1, quine.nxt1, quine.lo1, test="F") S: Resid. Df RSS Test Df Sum of Sq F Value Pr(F) 1 118 63.3104 2 120 64.0990 -Eth:Sex:Age:Lrn -2 -0.7886...

Dear R-users, During a fit procedure in a Logistic prediction model I encounter the following problem: error: in catg (xi, name=nam, label=lab: X has <2 category levels The following code is used: fit <-lrm(MRI_Diag_RC ~ factor(O4_1r) + N6_1r + leeftijd + LO1 + LO2 + LO3+ LO4+ LO5+ LO6+ LO7+ LO8+ LO9+ LO10+ LO11+ LO12+ LO13 + LO14+ LO15+ LO16+ LO17+ LO18+ LO19+ LO20+ LO21+ LO22+ LO23+ LO24 + LO26+ LO27 + LO29, model=T, x=T, y=T, data=dat) Most predictors are (dichotomous) nominal variables as is the problematic "LO2". Does anyone know what th...

Hello, I have a Dell 2950 with a Perc 5/i, two 300GB 15K SAS drives in a RAID0 array. I am considering going to ZFS and I would like to get some feedback about which situation would yield the highest performance: using the Perc 5/i to provide a hardware RAID0 that is presented as a single volume to OpenSolaris, or using the drives separately and creating the RAID0 with OpenSolaris and ZFS? Or

...ze horizontal operations from them, but I think only addition is currently recognized, and it expects the addition to be done (IIRC) by using shufflevector to split the vector into two, followed by an addition of the two halves, repeatedly. In fact for your case you could do something similar: %lo1 = shufflevector <4 x i1> %16, <4 x i1> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1> %hi1 = shufflevector <4 x i1> %16, <4 x i1> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 2, i32 3> %join = or <2 x i1> %lo1, %hi1 %lo2 = extractelement <2 x i1> %join, i32 0 %hi2...

...gression model. To model check I used stepAIC. But I don't know how it is interpreted . I could not any find any explanation about it For instance which model is preferable ? What are the critarias to choose beter model I will appreciate if you give me an explanation ? models --------- > lo1.step$anova Stepwise Model Path Analysis of Deviance Table Initial Model: res ~ as.factor(jeo) + as.factor(eg) + as.factor(ys) + as.factor(yy) + as.factor(ak) Final Model: res ~ as.factor(jeo) + as.factor(eg) + as.factor(ys) + as.factor(yy) + as.factor(ak) Step Df Deviance Resid. Df Re...

Hi all, llvm newbie here. I'm trying to branch based on a vector compare. I've found a slow way (below) which goes through memory. Is there some idiom I'm missing so that it would use for instance movmsk for SSE or vcmpgt & cr6 for altivec? Or do I need to resort to calling the intrinsic directly? Thanks, Stephen. %16 = fcmp ogt <4 x float> %15, %cr %17 =

> I recently did something like this. I have a webserver in a jail that > needs to talk to a database, and the webserver is the only thing that > should talk to the databse. > My solution was to use 2 jails: one for the webserver, and another for the > database. > Jail 1: > * runs webserver > * binds to real interface with real, routable IP > Jail 2: > *

...6 at 08:17:07AM +0200, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: > I want to serve IPv4 subnets 10.1.0.0/16 (machine A) and 10.2.0.0/16 > (machine B), and IPv6 subnets fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1::/96 (machine A) and > fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2::/96 (machine B) respectively. The jails are > connected on lo1. [...] > A $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/klaas/tinc-up > ifconfig $INTERFACE inet6 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 prefixlen 80 > route -6 add -host fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2:0:1 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 > route -6 add -net fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2::/96 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 > #...

...t exchange? I've wondered about giving each jail its own pseudo-interface. Are there any problems with creating many pseudo-interfaces like this? What sort of interface should I use? You apparently can't create multiple loopback interfaces which would be the obvious choice (ie `ifconfig lo1 create` does not work). The interface types I know about that allow creation of pseudo-interfaces are tunnel type interfaces which don't really suit this purpose. Is there something suitable? Given that packets are coming from a jail, is the packet construction I'm seeing correct, or sho...

Hi, I'm working with timeseries data. The values are every 5 seconds and each series can last up to 4-5 days. To generate the x-axis labels, I'm doing the following: ========================= # Variable for displaying hours on the x-axis rtime <<- as.POSIXct(round(range(timedata), "hours")) # Variable for displaying days on the x-axis stime <<-

...0.77.5.255 ether 00:07:e9:87:ca:4f media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) status: active lp0: flags=8810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 lo1: flags=8008<LOOPBACK,MULTICAST> mtu 16384 ppp0: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 sl0: flags=c010<POINTOPOINT,LINK2,MULTICAST> mtu 552 faith0: flags=8002<BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 ng0: flags=88d1<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1256...

...t;, but the client is trying to provide credentials for "host/<private FQDN>@<REALM>". Note that we were able to set up distinct kerberos entries for the private ip addresses by adding entries in /etc/hosts to resolve <private ip address> to <machine name>.<lo1>.<domain>, and using the same "private" FQDN in the kerberos database. In order to get a kerberos entry for private IP addresses to work with openssh and Simon's patch, however, we would need to modify Simon's patch to try matching kerberos credentials against all of...

Hello, I have configured jail for users with sshd ftpd and auth. I started this jail on IP 127.0.0.10(there is an alias on lo0 interface), there was not any bigger problem to start it. But i have a problem with internet in this jail. I can log in to this jail through ssh or ftpd but i can't connect to the internet. I try to set up some kind of nat but it doesn't work. Can anybody help me