search for: lmdb

On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 14:41 +0100, miguel medalha via samba wrote: > Hello > > In one of my DCs, when I run ./configure for Samba 4.9.0, it fails > with the following message: > > Checking for lmdb >= 0.9.16 via header check : not > found > Samba AD DC and --enable-selftest requires lmdb 0.9.16 or later > > My ./configure command line does not contain the option "–enable- > selftest", and "../configure –help" gives the following output: > > --ena...

>> Did you specify --without-ldb-ldmb? Nope. I didn't specify "–enable-selftest" either. The default for this option being "no", why does "configure" stop after complaining that "–enable-selftest" requires lmdb? Maybe I'm just being stupid... It happens.

>> As per the release notes, it should work unless you say "--without-ldb- >> lmdb". The message just got mucked up. The "configure" stage actually failed. How can it be a message problem only?

...n i'm happy with the status of 4.9.x then im moving it from the test repo to the stretch-samba49 repo. And I really suggest you wait until that happen, except when your want to test things out. Just change the repo name to : stretch-experimental If you want to test ldmb, the preparation for lmdb are done in the 4.9.x. packages. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_4.9_Features_added/changed#New_Experimental_LMDB_LDB_backend Im not aware of an upgrade possibilty of tdb to lmdb (yet). At least i did not find any upgrade notes. I hope this is a bit the answer your are looking for. Gre...

Hi list, are there preparations for upgrading a samba 4.8.5 to 4.9.1 via van-belle-repository to change the backend db? Is there some handwork necessary? Regards, Oliver

...on-Windows-based computer." So I don't know if it is the dbcheck or the SPN which is wrong. Those two SPN have been produced automatically by a Windows workstation. I don't know if it is the OS upgrade from the client (win7 to win10) or if it is the upgrade of Samba (4.8 TDB to 4.9 LMDB) that created this discrepancy, but it is there... Cleaning up the SPN remove the dbcheck error. Should I fill a bugzilla entry for this? Cheers, Denis -- Denis Cardon Tranquil IT 12 avenue Jules Verne (Bat. A) 44230 Saint Sébastien sur Loire (FRANCE) tel : +33 (0) 240 975 755 http://www.tr...

On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 14:41:54 +0100 miguel medalha via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello > > In one of my DCs, when I run ./configure for Samba 4.9.0, it fails > with the following message: > > Checking for lmdb >= 0.9.16 via header check : not > found Samba AD DC and --enable-selftest requires lmdb 0.9.16 or later > > My ./configure command line does not contain the option > "–enable-selftest", and "../configure –help" gives the following > output: > > --enab...

...Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Stefan G. Weichinger via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 17 oktober 2018 11:25 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Upgrade 4.8 to 4.9 with Backend-Change to lmdb? > > Am 26.09.18 um 14:47 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > > Hai, > > > > At this point i can not recommend to upgrade to 4.9.0 or 4.9.1, a > > side note on this. The bug in question why im blocking it for > > production, does not happen for domain members...

On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 19:08:52 +0200 Denis Cardon via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Louis, > > > > At this point i can not recommend to upgrade to 4.9.0 or 4.9.1, a > > side note on this. The bug in question why im blocking it for > > production, does not happen for domain members and AD-DC's but it's > > still a risk in my opinion.

Hi Louis, you could use the systemd "requires=" directive to enforce, that samba/smbd is running before winbind. Hth Oliver On 27.09.2018 12:04, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hai, > Small comment here.. > >> Not saying you shouldn't add it and like you, I always add it if >> required, but what I was trying to point out to Louis is, you don't

Am 26.09.18 um 14:47 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Hai, > > At this point i can not recommend to upgrade to 4.9.0 or 4.9.1, a > side note on this. The bug in question why im blocking it for > production, does not happen for domain members and AD-DC's but it's > still a risk in my opinion. Is that still true (oct 17th 2018)? Is that mentioned backend change

...with the status of 4.9.x then im moving it from the test repo to the stretch-samba49 repo. > And I really suggest you wait until that happen, except when your want to test things out. > Just change the repo name to : stretch-experimental > > If you want to test ldmb, the preparation for lmdb are done in the 4.9.x. packages. > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_4.9_Features_added/changed#New_Experimental_LMDB_LDB_backend > Im not aware of an upgrade possibilty of tdb to lmdb (yet). > At least i did not find any upgrade notes. > > I hope this is a bit the answer your a...

Hi there, I had some off list conversation with Aleksey and wanted to give an update on our findings (s. below). I'm currently preparing a test stack with ldb 1.4.0 (without lmdb support) and samba 4.8.3 build on top of it, to check whether lmdb support causes the mentioned trouble. An on a site note: When compiling ldb 1.4.0 with "--without-ldb-lmdb" a general error occurs during "make test": "make test called, but ldb was built --without-l...

...on. >> >> Is it a couple of hours something expected if dbcheck takes so much >> time? >> >> Is it maybe my AD db to be pathologic? > > Ouch! We did not see such long runtimes during our testing, which is > why no major warnings were made. Are you on TDB or LMDB? Does the > host have enough RAM? It's TDB. I am unaware of the chance to convert to LMDB. > > At your scale I would suggest say 10G, being 4GB for the main TDB, 4GB > for the transaction copy for the repack, and extra. It's close: 8GB, but while doing repack memory's u...

...via an openLDAP (hiphiphuraaaa) we started with a new domain (I think it's the best way after 18 years) and now we are pushing all objects into the now domain. They getting a new storage and all the fileserver have to move anyway so the time is right for making everything new. @Andrew We took lmdb as a backend for the database together with bind9. Stefan Am 03.02.20 um 23:09 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 13:44 +0100, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> Error verifying signature: parse error >> --------------ms040700010204060400070803 >> Content-Type: t...

Hello Cristian, Well, nothing to say about your steps, these looks good. And lmdb could be disable in the sernet packages, cant say, i dont know. And only one DC has these problems or all? If only one DC crashed. Which DC crashes. Last added? Oldest? Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens...

...C ------------------------------------------- By default, the Jansson JSON library is required for Samba to build. It is strictly required for the Samba AD DC, and is optional for builds "--without-ad-dc" by specifying "--without-json-audit" at configure time. New experimental LMDB LDB backend --------------------------------- A new experimental LDB backend using LMDB is now available. This allows databases larger than 4Gb (Currently the limit is set to 6Gb, but this will be increased in a future release). To enable lmdb, provision or join a domain using the "--backend-...

...C ------------------------------------------- By default, the Jansson JSON library is required for Samba to build. It is strictly required for the Samba AD DC, and is optional for builds "--without-ad-dc" by specifying "--without-json-audit" at configure time. New experimental LMDB LDB backend --------------------------------- A new experimental LDB backend using LMDB is now available. This allows databases larger than 4Gb (Currently the limit is set to 6Gb, but this will be increased in a future release). To enable lmdb, provision or join a domain using the "--backend-...

After update I have got this: samba-tool drs kcc -Uadm2 -d 9 INFO: Current debug levels: all: 9 tdb: 9 printdrivers: 9 lanman: 9 smb: 9 rpc_parse: 9 rpc_srv: 9 rpc_cli: 9 passdb: 9 sam: 9 auth: 9 winbind: 9 vfs: 9 idmap: 9 quota: 9 acls: 9 locking: 9 msdfs: 9 dmapi: 9 registry: 9 scavenger: 9 dns: 9 ldb: 9 tevent: 9 auth_audit: 9

In addition to Rowland comment. if you still able to test it. Remove 1 setting at a time, restart and test it. Start with these, in this order. logging = syslog only prefork children = 8 I think if the logging line is removed your problem is solved. man smb.conf /logging should explain more. Because I cant/find the setting : logging = syslog only Greetz, Louis