search for: lm_response

...th/mech-ntlm.c --- dovecot-1.0-test52.vanilla/src/auth/mech-ntlm.c 2004-10-22 17:32:27.000000000 +0400 +++ dovecot-1.0-test52/src/auth/mech-ntlm.c 2004-11-10 16:45:53.000000000 +0300 @@ -42,10 +42,15 @@ lm_credentials_callback(const char *cred const unsigned char *client_response; unsigned char lm_response[LM_RESPONSE_SIZE]; unsigned char hash[LM_HASH_SIZE]; + unsigned int response_length; buffer_t *hash_buffer; int ret; - if (credentials == NULL) { + response_length = + ntlmssp_buffer_length(request->response, lm_response); + client_response = ntlmssp_buffer_data(request->response, lm...

...check) ntlm_password_check: invalid LanMan password length (0) for user TS First, the variable for length in the sourcecode seems wrong: https://git.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=blob;f=libcli/auth/ntlm_check.c;h=7f91b52a5fd78982d85a300dc610329a7bd9a801;hb=HEAD#l435 I guess it should read "lm_response->length" in the debug message instead of "nt_response->length". The value of "lm_response->length" is actually 1 in this case. So here is the question: are these supposed to work or is this considered legacy/unsupported/etc.? Is OS/2 still a supported client i...

...rd_check: invalid LanMan password length (0) for user TS > > First, the variable for length in the sourcecode seems wrong: > https://git.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=blob;f=libcli/auth/ntlm_check.c;h=7f91b52a5fd78982d85a300dc610329a7bd9a801;hb=HEAD#l435 > > I guess it should read "lm_response->length" in the debug message > instead of "nt_response->length". > > The value of "lm_response->length" is actually 1 in this case. > > > So here is the question: are these supposed to work or is this > considered legacy/unsupported/etc.? &...

...user=<optimized out>, domain=<optimized out>, nt_hash=nt_hash at entry=0x811a49430 "\347\305\335 ", <incomplete sequence \350\356>, server_chal=server_chal at entry=0x7fffffffd3f0, server_timestamp=server_timestamp at entry=0x811a85a08, names_blob=0x7fffffffd530, lm_response=0x7fffffffd410, nt_response=0x7fffffffd420, lm_session_key=0x0, user_session_key=0x7fffffffd440) at ../libcli/auth/smbencrypt.c:493 #6 0x0000000803b34e4b in cli_credentials_get_ntlm_response (cred=0x811a8b060, mem_ctx=mem_ctx at entry=0x811a850b0, flags=flags at entry=0x7fffffffd604, challenge...

...= NULL) && !auth->ntlm2_negotiated) { passdb->lookup_credentials(auth_request, PASSDB_CREDENTIALS_LANMAN, lm_credentials_callback); @@ -105,8 +106,16 @@ ntlm_credentials_callback(const char *cr NTLMSSP_V2_RESPONSE_SIZE) == 0; } else { unsigned char ntlm_response[NTLMSSP_RESPONSE_SIZE]; + const unsigned char *client_lm_response = + ntlmssp_buffer_data(auth->response, lm_response); - ntlmssp_v1_response(hash, auth->challenge, ntlm_response); + if (auth->ntlm2_negotiated) + ntlmssp2_response(hash, auth->challenge, + client_lm_respon...

...ESSAGE Signature : 'NTLMSSP' MessageType : NtLmAuthenticate (3) LmChallengeResponseLen : 0x0018 (24) LmChallengeResponseMaxLen: 0x0018 (24) LmChallengeResponse : * LmChallengeResponse : union ntlmssp_LM_RESPONSE(case 24) v1: struct LM_RESPONSE Response : 1845a8c3bc8ab143649a254a5509680933841b5c5e34cc9c NtChallengeResponseLen : 0x00b0 (176) NtChallengeResponseMaxLen: 0x00b0 (176) NtChallengeResponse : * NtChallengeRespons...

...rk_logon (creds=0x7f48048c63e0, binding_handle=0x7f48048c6ef0, mem_ctx=0x7f48048c4c30, logon_parameters=2080, username=0x7f48048be210 "a_user", domain=0x7f48048de740 "UNIMORE", workstation=0x7f48048c5890 "ORTO", chal=0x7f48048ccc60 "8\332G\332\317\036? \221", lm_response=..., nt_response=..., authoritative=0x7fff0ba1cabf "", flags=0x7fff0ba1cae8, info3=0x7fff0ba1caf0) at ../source3/rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:476 #15 0x00007f4800e521f1 in domain_client_validate (mem_ctx=0x7f48048c4c30, user_info=0x7f48048a8870, domain=0x7f480489e770 "UNIMORE", cha...

...ESSAGE Signature : 'NTLMSSP' MessageType : NtLmAuthenticate (3) LmChallengeResponseLen : 0x0018 (24) LmChallengeResponseMaxLen: 0x0018 (24) LmChallengeResponse : * LmChallengeResponse : union ntlmssp_LM_RESPONSE(case 24) v1: struct LM_RESPONSE Response : fb3bc06d202cf55d212e91453073beeba275df3da9655dd8 NtChallengeResponseLen : 0x00a4 (164) NtChallengeResponseMaxLen: 0x00a4 (164) NtChallengeResponse : * NtChallengeRespons...

...Signature : 'NTLMSSP' MessageType : NtLmAuthenticate (3) LmChallengeResponseLen : 0x0018 (24) LmChallengeResponseMaxLen: 0x0018 (24) LmChallengeResponse : * LmChallengeResponse : union ntlmssp_LM_RESPONSE(case 24) v1: struct LM_RESPONSE Response : 078e894cc35e1708df68607b51c47cd6fc4cd6febd7d4ca4 NtChallengeResponseLen : 0x0072 (114) NtChallengeResponseMaxLen: 0x0072 (114) NtChallengeResponse : * NtChallenge...

Hello all, as I promised some days ago here is NTLM (aka SPA, aka MSN) authentication support patchset. It contains common code in src/lib-ntlm directory, Samba compatible NTLM password scheme and authentication mechanism itself. All patches are against 1.0-test30. Please take a look. Best regards. -- Andrey Panin | Linux and UNIX system administrator pazke at donpac.ru | PGP key:

...ESSAGE Signature : 'NTLMSSP' MessageType : NtLmAuthenticate (3) LmChallengeResponseLen : 0x0018 (24) LmChallengeResponseMaxLen: 0x0018 (24) LmChallengeResponse : * LmChallengeResponse : union ntlmssp_LM_RESPONSE(case 24) v1: struct LM_RESPONSE Response : de06e6edc8275e8aa58a9e95067f4cbc5bb6ac5b0279a515 NtChallengeResponseLen : 0x0106 (262) NtChallengeResponseMaxLen: 0x0106 (262) NtChallengeResponse : * NtChallengeRespons...

...: 'NTLMSSP' > MessageType : NtLmAuthenticate (3) > LmChallengeResponseLen : 0x0018 (24) > LmChallengeResponseMaxLen: 0x0018 (24) > LmChallengeResponse : * > LmChallengeResponse : union ntlmssp_LM_RESPONSE(case 24) > v1: struct LM_RESPONSE > Response : > de06e6edc8275e8aa58a9e95067f4cbc5bb6ac5b0279a515 > NtChallengeResponseLen : 0x0106 (262) > NtChallengeResponseMaxLen: 0x0106 (262) > NtChallengeResponse...

...Signature : 'NTLMSSP' MessageType : NtLmAuthenticate (3) LmChallengeResponseLen : 0x0018 (24) LmChallengeResponseMaxLen: 0x0018 (24) LmChallengeResponse : * LmChallengeResponse : union ntlmssp_LM_RESPONSE(case 24) v1: struct LM_RESPONSE Response : 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 NtChallengeResponseLen : 0x0128 (296) NtChallengeResponseMaxLen: 0x0128 (296) NtChallengeResponse : * NtChal...

Mandi! Rowland penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > Even though your users may have the same username in AD as in the NT4-style > domain, they are different users, so a few thoughts. You have 'map to guest > = bad user', so I take it you must have 'guest ok = yes' set in the shares > (you haven't shown us the shares), so try changing 'bad user' to

...Signatu : 'NTLMSSP' MessageType : NtLmAuthenticate (3) LmChallengeResponseLen : 0x0018 (24) LmChallengeResponseMaxLen: 0x0018 (24) LmChallengeResponse : * LmChallengeResponse : union ntlmssp_LM_RESPONSE(case 24) v1: struct LM_RESPONSE Response : c9d5ed38c43e920200000000000000000000000000000000 NtChallengeResponseLen : 0x0018 (24) NtChallengeResponseMaxLen: 0x0018 (4) NtChallengeResponse : * NtChallen...

Hello, I have a question because POSIX ACL with SMB2 max protocol does not work properly.Did you test VFS xattr acls with SMB2 max protocol? Is it working corectly? Best regards/Adrian Berlin --