search for: llvn

I have just started using llvn and I am running in the following error when trying to run Hello World Pass in the llvm documentation. opt: /usr/local/llvm/src/lib/VMCore/Pass.cpp:158: void <unnamed>::PassRegistrar::RegisterPass(llvm::PassInfo&): Assertion `Inserted && "Pass registered multiple times!"...

...t or check the archives if you have concerns about documentation not being updated: http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/www-scripts <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/www-scripts> Why are you doing this? We want to increase the reliability, stability, and speed of the LLVN services. The current machine is outdated and is not set up for our current needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. Thank you, Tanya -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/2...

...oked natively. > > LLVM now supports all thread-local storage models on SystemZ. > (Previous releases would support only the local-exec TLS model.) > > LLVM now uses the POPCNT instruction on z196 and above. > > LLVM now uses the RISBGN instruction on zEC12 and above. > > LLVN now supports the transactional-execuction facility > on zEC12 and above. > > LLVM now supports the z13 processor and its vector facility. http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=245102&view=rev > clang: > > Clang will now always default to the z10 processor when compiling &g...

On 30 April 2015 at 10:06, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> >> I'd like to resurrect the discussion on replacing libgomp with >> libiomp as the default OpenMP runtime library linked with -fopenmp. >> >> >> For reference, the previous discussion is accessible there: >>

Dear everyone, The in-progress release notes for 3.7 [1,2] make it look like we didn't do very much over the past six months. Obviously that's not the case at all, so let's get them in shape! If you've been thinking "I should probably add this to the release notes at some point", now is the time :-) I have a list below of changes that might be worth mentioning. I

...al or sexual codes for their "LLVM" conference, wish > them good luck with their social charity and have fun with their social > distractions. > > At some point, some group of people who actually want a better compiler > and who want to work for it, will either fork LLVM to LLVN / LLVM2, or > start from scratch. > > > Renato: > > If they miss the mark, or make mistakes, I'd first point out to them, > > not assume ill intent. This has been my personal experience and I have > > no reason to change behaviour. > > Again, if you lost grip...

...If they need political or sexual codes for their "LLVM" conference, wish them good luck with their social charity and have fun with their social distractions. At some point, some group of people who actually want a better compiler and who want to work for it, will either fork LLVM to LLVN / LLVM2, or start from scratch. Renato: > If they miss the mark, or make mistakes, I'd first point out to them, > not assume ill intent. This has been my personal experience and I have > no reason to change behaviour. Again, if you lost grips of meritocracy so much in your tech-a...

...y need political or sexual codes for their "LLVM" conference, wish them good luck with their social charity and have fun with their social distractions. > > At some point, some group of people who actually want a better compiler and who want to work for it, will either fork LLVM to LLVN / LLVM2, or start from scratch. > > > Renato: > > If they miss the mark, or make mistakes, I'd first point out to them, > > not assume ill intent. This has been my personal experience and I have > > no reason to change behaviour. > > Again, if you lost grips...