Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "llvmvmcore".
Did you mean:
llvmcore
2009 Jan 15
0
[LLVMdev] win32/llvm.sln, win32/clang.sln
....lib files
> where
> .obj were generated on the past, and require a parameter to be passed
> to
> the linker for including them on the final executable.
I was linking with
VMCore.lib support.lib System.lib Analysis.lib CodeGen.lib Target.lib Transforms.lib
and I'm now linking with
LLVMVMCore.lib LLVMScalarOpts.lib LLVMSelectionDAG.lib LLVMSupport.lib LLVMSystem.lib LLVMAnalysis.lib LLVMCodeGen.lib LLVMTarget.lib LLVMTransformUtils.lib LLVMAsmPrinter.lib
> > In my opinion, we have to choose one way and remove the other one. If
> > it helps, you can put in the win32 directo...
2009 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] win32/llvm.sln, win32/clang.sln
Mondada Gabriele <g.mondada at etel.ch> writes:
> I just moved to the CMake solution. By the way, the generated libs
> haven't the same names.
Which ones? The only difference is that we now generate .lib files where
.obj were generated on the past, and require a parameter to be passed to
the linker for including them on the final executable.
> In my opinion, we have to choose
2008 Sep 21
0
[LLVMdev] State of CMake build system.
This is an updated version of the patch that fixes some issues on VC++
builds.
--
Oscar
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cmake.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 73590 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080921/687284b5/attachment.bin>
2008 Sep 24
1
[LLVMdev] State of CMake build system.
...-- archive
-- archive
-- archive
-- ipo
-- bitreader
-- linker
-- jit
-- linking jit
-- ipo
-- debugger
-- asmparser
-- bitreader
-- support
-- jit
-- linking jit
-- Configuring done
-- Generating done
CMake Error: Unknown Target referenced : D:/llvm/include/llvm/Intrinsics.gen
CMake Error: Target: LLVMVMCore depends on unknown target:
D:/llvm/include/llvm/Intrinsics.gen
-- Build files have been written to: D:/llvm
2008 Sep 20
4
[LLVMdev] State of CMake build system.
IMHO, the CMake-based build system is almost complete enough to replace
current MSVC++ project files (modulo some community review and
bug-fixing). Is this enough for adding it to the LLVM repo?
>From the point of view of a MSVC++ user, the new build system is trivial
to maintain: you can add a new library or tool executable in less time
that it takes to open the project file on MSVC++, it