search for: llvmprivatelinkage

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "llvmprivatelinkage".

2010 Jan 11
2
[LLVMdev] Operations on constant array value?
2010/1/11 Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> > I have not tried this, but a linkage type of PrivateLinkage would not add > to the symbol table according > to the doc. > > LLVMSetLinkage(g, LLVMPrivateLinkage); > Thanks - I hadn't thought of that. > > Garrison > > On Jan 11, 2010, at 14:03, James Williams wrote: > > 2010/1/11 Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> > >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:07 AM, James Williams <junk at giantblob.com> >> wrote...
2010 Jan 11
0
[LLVMdev] Operations on constant array value?
I have not tried this, but a linkage type of PrivateLinkage would not add to the symbol table according to the doc. LLVMSetLinkage(g, LLVMPrivateLinkage); Garrison On Jan 11, 2010, at 14:03, James Williams wrote: > 2010/1/11 Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:07 AM, James Williams <junk at giantblob.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've read http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#t_...
2010 Jan 11
0
[LLVMdev] Operations on constant array value?
...however rehashed. Garrison On Jan 11, 2010, at 16:34, James Williams wrote: > 2010/1/11 Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> > I have not tried this, but a linkage type of PrivateLinkage would not add to the symbol table according > to the doc. > > LLVMSetLinkage(g, LLVMPrivateLinkage); > > Thanks - I hadn't thought of that. > > Garrison > > On Jan 11, 2010, at 14:03, James Williams wrote: > >> 2010/1/11 Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:07 AM, James Williams <junk at giantblob.com> wrote: &...
2010 Jan 11
2
[LLVMdev] Operations on constant array value?
2010/1/11 Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:07 AM, James Williams <junk at giantblob.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've read http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#t_array and > > http://llvm.org/docs/GetElementPtr.html and if I've understood right > there > > are no operations that act directly on arrays -