search for: llvmobjects

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: >> Jack, >> >> What version of CMake are you using? >> >> -Chris > > Chris, > I am using cmake 3.5.2. My read of this problem is as follows. > While libLLVM.dylib is

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Jack Howarth > <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: >>> Jack, >>> >>> What version of CMake are you using? >>> >>>

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > Jack, > > What version of CMake are you using? > > -Chris Chris, I am using cmake 3.5.2. My read of this problem is as follows. While libLLVM.dylib is being linked against -lxar when -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB:BOOL=ON is passed to cmake, the libLLVM.dylib is created with -Wl,-dead_strip such that

Hi! TL;DR WDYT of adding zlib decompression capabilities to LLVMObject library? ld.gold from GNU binutils has --compress-debug-sections=zlib option, which uses zlib to compress .debug_xxx sections and renames them to .zdebug_xxx. binutils (and GDB) support this properly, while LLVM command line tools don't: $ ld --version GNU gold (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu 2.22) 1.11 $ ./bin/clang++ -g a.cc

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com>wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> TL;DR WDYT of adding zlib decompression capabilities to LLVMObject >> library? >> > >> ld.gold from GNU binutils has --compress-debug-sections=zlib option,

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> TL;DR WDYT of adding zlib decompression

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>wrote: > Hi! > > TL;DR WDYT of adding zlib decompression capabilities to LLVMObject library? > > ld.gold from GNU binutils has --compress-debug-sections=zlib option, > which uses zlib to compress .debug_xxx sections and renames them to > .zdebug_xxx. > binutils (and GDB) support this properly,

Hi, Using master at b0a1c0b72c9c61f8b0a223e08f43498abb64f5e8, I cannot build LLVM. I configured with: CC=clang CXX=clang++ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/opt/llvm11-git \ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \ -DLLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON \ -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON \ -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF \ -DLLVM_ENABLE_EH=ON \ -DLLVM_ENABLE_RTTI=ON \

Just in case - do we want to link with libz.so installed in the system, or be self-contained and copy sources to LLVM repo? On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at

Historically we've done the former. The latter would require Chris wanting to do that. -eric On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: > Just in case - do we want to link with libz.so installed in the system, or > be self-contained and copy sources to LLVM repo? > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo

On 29 May 2015 at 19:06, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Having proper error handling in LLVM's Object parsing library is a nice > thing by itself, but it would additionally allow us to find bugs by fuzzing > (see r238451 that adds llvm-dwarfdump-fuzzer tool), for which the clean > input validation is essential. > > This is a

Hi @ll, Over the past years I have been looking into how to reduce the size of the SDK that ships with Xcode and how to improve build times for the overall OS inside Apple. The result is a tool called TAPI, which is used at Apple for all things related to text-based dynamic library files (.tbd). What are text-based dynamic library files? Text-based dynamic library files (TBDs) are a textual

I was looking to write a cross platform utility that worked with ELF/DWARF files. I need the utility to run on OS X, Linux and Windows. I figured I could use clang/llvm to build this tool. I've made good progress on OS X. Before I got too far, though. I decided to verify that I can build the code on Windows. I downloaded the 3.8.0 Windows installer from the llvm downwloads page, ran the

Hi, Myself and a colleague of mine are trying to use LLVM's exported targets [1] on trunk and I've noticed that the generated CMake files (LLVMConfig.cmake and LLVMExport.cmake) are broken when trying to use Visual Studio 2015 (using CMake 3.2.1). ## Broken target properties in LLVMExports.cmake LLVM itself builds fine but when our project tries to do ``find_package(LLVM)`` we get the

Hi Juergen, At a minimum I think adding the support to libobject, etc so the various llvm tools can read or even write files from/for OSX should be fairly non-controversial so how about go ahead and do that first (I'll happily review if you'd like) and then we can go from there to do anything else with TAPI and llvm? Sound good? -eric On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:01 PM Juergen Ributzka via

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Having proper error handling in LLVM's Object parsing library is a nice > thing by itself, but it would additionally allow us to find bugs by fuzzing > (see r238451 that adds llvm-dwarfdump-fuzzer tool), for which the clean > input validation is essential. > > This

On 06/18/2015 06:46 PM, Dan Liew wrote: >> The issue is the that that generated LLVMExports.cmake file has this in it >> INTERFACE_LINK_LIBRARIES "LLVMObject;LLVMSupport;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\DIA SDK\lib\diaguids.lib" > > Hmm actually this might be a bug in the > ``/lib/DebugInfo/PDB/CMakeLists.txt`` file. CC'ing Zach Turner seeing

Hi everyone, I'm working on a library for runtime introspection of C++ programs, for example, getting stack traces, decorating logs with source file information, etc. It currently uses LLVMObject and LLVMDebugInfo. There's a feature I want to add, but it requires that I understand where on the stack local variables are located. For this to work on x86-64, I would need to do whole

This might be a bit late, but I've got another argument for bundling zlib source with LLVM. Sanitizer tools need to symbolize stack traces in the reports. We've been using standalone symbolizer binary until now; sanitizer runtime spawns a new process as soon as an error is found, and communicates with it over a pipe. This is very cumbersome to deploy, because we need to keep another

With comdats parts of the file might never be read. There are also multiple levels of cache and while all the relocations of a file will fit in ram, it is probably still more efficient to validate them as they are read. But I think (typing on a phone) that relocations are another case where the best is to have a more specific api: the only way the relocation is invalid from the perspective of