search for: llvmized

On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 08:19:58AM -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > How about something along the notion of "build or construct" as in we > have two primary tools in llvm: > > llvm-build - builds programs to be run llvm-build or llvm-driver are both kinda long but at least they make sense... As an aside, llava and llama are both taken, llvmize? llvminator? llvm-emerge a la

On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 07:38, Misha Brukman wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 01:17:24AM -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > I'm not thrilled with llvm-gen because it has overtones of "code > > > generation" (which actually isn't far from the truth). But, it > > > conjures up the wrong kind of tool ..

On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 08:51, Misha Brukman wrote: > llvm-build or llvm-driver are both kinda long but at least they make > sense... Yeah, that's my sense too. > > As an aside, llava and llama are both taken, llvmize? llvminator? > llvm-emerge a la gentoo? Uh. No? > > > llvm-run - runs programs built by llvm-build > > Wait, is llvm-run the same as lli?

...ing web applications, especially PHP based ones, perform better. While PHP has come a long way since its initial releases, it could still benefit from LLVM style "whole program" optimization. So, I had this radical idea. What if we built a PHP front end for LLVM so PHP programs could be LLVMized. What if we also built a i386 ELF front end so that we could factor in Apache and its various modules? That is, we build an LLVM front end that reads an executable or shared object in ELF format for an i386 processor (or whatever) and produces LLVM bytecode for it? Then, all of Apache and PHP and...

On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 08:51, Misha Brukman wrote: > > > llvm-build or llvm-driver are both kinda long but at least they make > > sense... > > Yeah, that's my sense too. I agree, llvm-build or llvm-driver do have the handy effect of actually meaning something. :) -Chris > > As an aside, llava and llama are both taken,

...P based ones, perform > better. While PHP has come a long way since its > initial releases, it could still benefit from LLVM > style "whole program" optimization. So, I had this > radical idea. What if we built a PHP front end for > LLVM so PHP programs could be LLVMized. What if we > also built a i386 ELF front end so that we could > factor in Apache and its various modules? That is, > we build an LLVM front end that reads an executable > or shared object in ELF format for an i386 processor > (or whatever) and produces LLVM bytecode for it...