search for: llvmgetusedvalue

.... */ +typedef struct LLVMOpaqueUse *LLVMUseRef; + ... +void LLVMReplaceAllUsesWith(LLVMValueRef OldVal, LLVMValueRef NewVal); ... +/* Operations on Uses */ +LLVMUseRef LLVMGetFirstUse(LLVMValueRef Val); +LLVMUseRef LLVMGetNextUse(LLVMUseRef U); +LLVMValueRef LLVMGetUser(LLVMUseRef U); +LLVMValueRef LLVMGetUsedValue(LLVMUseRef U); These seem okay to me, but I don't have too much experience with using the Use classes. The impression I've gotten from the other developers is that the C bindings is really designed to just get data into llvm, and any complex manipulations should really be done in C++ pass...

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: > My front-end is sync'd with the trunk now, and working well, but it > required some additional functions exposed in the C bindings.  I > hereby submit them for review and approval for inclusion in the trunk. > LLVMGetAttribute had a bug in it. Here's the revised version of the patch

My front-end is sync'd with the trunk now, and working well, but it required some additional functions exposed in the C bindings. I hereby submit them for review and approval for inclusion in the trunk. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cbindings.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 7269 bytes Desc: not available URL:

...f; > + > ... > +void LLVMReplaceAllUsesWith(LLVMValueRef OldVal, LLVMValueRef NewVal); > ... > +/* Operations on Uses */ > +LLVMUseRef LLVMGetFirstUse(LLVMValueRef Val); > +LLVMUseRef LLVMGetNextUse(LLVMUseRef U); > +LLVMValueRef LLVMGetUser(LLVMUseRef U); > +LLVMValueRef LLVMGetUsedValue(LLVMUseRef U); > > > These seem okay to me, but I don't have too much experience with using > the Use classes. The impression I've gotten from the other developers > is that the C bindings is really designed to just get data into llvm, > and any complex manipulations shoul...