search for: llvmgetfirstus

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "llvmgetfirstus".

Did you mean: llvmgetfirstuse
2009 Oct 08
2
[LLVMdev] Some additions to the C bindings
...indings recently so hopefully I have some idea of what I'm talking about :) Comments are inlined: +/** See the llvm::Use class. */ +typedef struct LLVMOpaqueUse *LLVMUseRef; + ... +void LLVMReplaceAllUsesWith(LLVMValueRef OldVal, LLVMValueRef NewVal); ... +/* Operations on Uses */ +LLVMUseRef LLVMGetFirstUse(LLVMValueRef Val); +LLVMUseRef LLVMGetNextUse(LLVMUseRef U); +LLVMValueRef LLVMGetUser(LLVMUseRef U); +LLVMValueRef LLVMGetUsedValue(LLVMUseRef U); These seem okay to me, but I don't have too much experience with using the Use classes. The impression I've gotten from the other developers...
2009 Oct 07
0
[LLVMdev] Some additions to the C bindings
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: > My front-end is sync'd with the trunk now, and working well, but it > required some additional functions exposed in the C bindings.  I > hereby submit them for review and approval for inclusion in the trunk. > LLVMGetAttribute had a bug in it. Here's the revised version of the patch
2009 Oct 06
3
[LLVMdev] Some additions to the C bindings
My front-end is sync'd with the trunk now, and working well, but it required some additional functions exposed in the C bindings. I hereby submit them for review and approval for inclusion in the trunk. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cbindings.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 7269 bytes Desc: not available URL:
2009 Oct 08
0
[LLVMdev] Some additions to the C bindings
...easier time calling the C bindings than the C++ API. > > > +/** See the llvm::Use class. */ > +typedef struct LLVMOpaqueUse *LLVMUseRef; > + > ... > +void LLVMReplaceAllUsesWith(LLVMValueRef OldVal, LLVMValueRef NewVal); > ... > +/* Operations on Uses */ > +LLVMUseRef LLVMGetFirstUse(LLVMValueRef Val); > +LLVMUseRef LLVMGetNextUse(LLVMUseRef U); > +LLVMValueRef LLVMGetUser(LLVMUseRef U); > +LLVMValueRef LLVMGetUsedValue(LLVMUseRef U); > > > These seem okay to me, but I don't have too much experience with using > the Use classes. The impression I've...