Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "llvmgetfirstus".
Did you mean:
llvmgetfirstuse
2009 Oct 08
2
[LLVMdev] Some additions to the C bindings
...indings recently so hopefully I have some idea of
what I'm talking about :) Comments are inlined:
+/** See the llvm::Use class. */
+typedef struct LLVMOpaqueUse *LLVMUseRef;
+
...
+void LLVMReplaceAllUsesWith(LLVMValueRef OldVal, LLVMValueRef NewVal);
...
+/* Operations on Uses */
+LLVMUseRef LLVMGetFirstUse(LLVMValueRef Val);
+LLVMUseRef LLVMGetNextUse(LLVMUseRef U);
+LLVMValueRef LLVMGetUser(LLVMUseRef U);
+LLVMValueRef LLVMGetUsedValue(LLVMUseRef U);
These seem okay to me, but I don't have too much experience with using
the Use classes. The impression I've gotten from the other developers...
2009 Oct 07
0
[LLVMdev] Some additions to the C bindings
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote:
> My front-end is sync'd with the trunk now, and working well, but it
> required some additional functions exposed in the C bindings. I
> hereby submit them for review and approval for inclusion in the trunk.
>
LLVMGetAttribute had a bug in it. Here's the revised version of the patch
2009 Oct 06
3
[LLVMdev] Some additions to the C bindings
My front-end is sync'd with the trunk now, and working well, but it
required some additional functions exposed in the C bindings. I
hereby submit them for review and approval for inclusion in the trunk.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cbindings.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 7269 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
2009 Oct 08
0
[LLVMdev] Some additions to the C bindings
...easier time calling the C bindings than the C++ API.
>
>
> +/** See the llvm::Use class. */
> +typedef struct LLVMOpaqueUse *LLVMUseRef;
> +
> ...
> +void LLVMReplaceAllUsesWith(LLVMValueRef OldVal, LLVMValueRef NewVal);
> ...
> +/* Operations on Uses */
> +LLVMUseRef LLVMGetFirstUse(LLVMValueRef Val);
> +LLVMUseRef LLVMGetNextUse(LLVMUseRef U);
> +LLVMValueRef LLVMGetUser(LLVMUseRef U);
> +LLVMValueRef LLVMGetUsedValue(LLVMUseRef U);
>
>
> These seem okay to me, but I don't have too much experience with using
> the Use classes. The impression I've...