search for: llvmfunction

...result, though. Can I somehow disable this optimization in the pass, leading to more verbose IR code? Here is the code I use to create the IR: llvm::LLVMContext c; llvm::Module module("test", c); llvm::Type * functionType = llvm::IntegerType::get(c, 16); llvm::Function * llvmFunction = llvm::cast <llvm::Function>(module.getOrInsertFunction("foo", functionType, nullptr)); llvmFunction->setCallingConv(llvm::CallingConv::C); llvm::BasicBlock * body = llvm::BasicBlock::Create(c, "__entry__", llvmFunction); llvm::IRBuilder <> builder(bo...

...e this optimization in the pass, leading to more > verbose IR code? > > Here is the code I use to create the IR: > > llvm::LLVMContext c; > llvm::Module module("test", c); > llvm::Type * functionType = llvm::IntegerType::get(c, 16); > llvm::Function * llvmFunction = llvm::cast > <llvm::Function>(module.getOrInsertFunction("foo", functionType, > nullptr)); > llvmFunction->setCallingConv(llvm::CallingConv::C); > llvm::BasicBlock * body = llvm::BasicBlock::Create(c, "__entry__", > llvmFunction); > llvm::IR...

...() {} } int main() { Module* module = new Module("module"); FunctionType* funType = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, vector<const Type*>(), false); Function* nativeFunction = new Function( funType, GlobalValue::ExternalLinkage, "native", module); Function* llvmFunction = new Function(funType, GlobalValue::ExternalLinkage, "llvmFunction", module); BasicBlock* block = new BasicBlock("Entry", llvmFunction); new CallInst(nativeFunction, vector<Value*>(), "", block); new ReturnInst(block); sys::DynamicLibrary dynamicLib...

Hi Gael I am sorry that I couldn't explain what I was trying to say, anyway I've got the answer :) . In the *parseFunction* method returns *llvmfunction* pointer of compiled method and then it will be stored in to cache. Could you please more elaborate on how those machine instructions ( native functions) executing by llvm. I was trying trace and I couldn't able to find out which component is taking those native functions and execute them o...

.... Hi Gael, does it mean vmkit will based on the latest llvm after the merge finished? I run into the same issue Chris meet when trying to verify tilegx backend by compiling vmkit. JavaJIT.cpp:1262:23: error: no member named 'removeFnAttr' in 'llvm::Function' llvmFunction->removeFnAttr( then I change to vmkit2, but found it's based on 3.2 only, failed compile with latest llvm > > See you, > Gaël > > > > 2013/2/24 Minas Abrahamyan <minas.subs at gmail.com>: >> Hi Harris, >> >> A question has arisen, what is t...

Hi, I have migrated an LLVM front-end from LLVM 3.5 to 3.8 and now to 3.9 and ORC, and there is a concept which I could not transfer. Consider: extern "C" { void somefunc() {} } … auto llvmfunc = llvm::Function::Create(type, llvmFunction::PrivateLinkage, "bla", module)); executionengine.addGlobalMapping(llvmfunc, &somefunc); // now I have llvmfunc to work with and don't need to consider anything else The GlobalMappingLayer class seems to provide the functionality I want. I oriented myself on the example from http...

...ing JavaJIT.cpp for Release+Asserts build (bytecode) warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-maybe-uninitialized'; did you mean '-Wno-uninitialized'? [-Wunknown-warning-option] JavaJIT.cpp:1262:23: error: no member named 'removeFnAttr' in 'llvm::Function' llvmFunction->removeFnAttr( ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 1 warning and 1 error generated. make[3]: *** [/home/chris/vmkit/lib/j3/Compiler/Release+Asserts/JavaJIT.ll] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/chris/vmkit/lib/j3/Compiler' make[2]: *** [all] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/chris/vmkit/...

Hi VMKit JIT has a function cache to store compiled IR code , so, as soon as method is compiled , it will be stored in to function cache. My question is , who will use this compiled information from function cache. Since we are jitting , the llvm translate source code in to native code and executing them . So, how we relates this function cache with JIT ? Thanks Regards Sri.

Hi Minas, Basically, you should not have any difference between the two projects :) (it's not really the case, but we are working on this problem). To explain (sorry for my long email!), I work for a french research institution (Inria) and, as we have an Inria research project around VMKit, I had to create a repository inside my institution (a researcher has always to make his institution

...ot" files that can be turned into a variety of graphics formats with the graphviz toolset that you can get on the net. If you're running on a system with graphviz installed and with 'gv' (ghostview), you can even call functions like this from your code or from the debugger: LLVMFunction->viewCFG() also ->viewCFGOnly(); > Also, when I compile a C file to llvm assembly code i.e using llvmgcc -S > option then the output file has lot of "declare" and "typedef" and then > the "main" starts. Sorry for my naive questions but can you tell me...

...+Asserts build (bytecode) > warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-maybe-uninitialized'; did you mean > '-Wno-uninitialized'? [-Wunknown-warning-option] > JavaJIT.cpp:1262:23: error: no member named 'removeFnAttr' in > 'llvm::Function' > llvmFunction->removeFnAttr( > ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ > 1 warning and 1 error generated. > make[3]: *** > [/home/chris/vmkit/lib/j3/Compiler/Release+Asserts/JavaJIT.ll] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/chris/vmkit/lib/j3/Compiler' > make[2]: *** [all] Error 1 > make[2]: L...

Hi Harris, A question has arisen, what is the difference between VMKit2 and VMKit, and why, in the first place the new VMKit2 fork was been created? Thanks for answer :) Best regards, Minas On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Harris Bakiras <h.bakiras at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > For the moment you can install VMKit following these instructions: > >