Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "llvmde".
Did you mean:
llvmdev
2008 Apr 13
2
[LLVMdev] Is there a reason why memcmp isn't an intrinsic?
Since you have memcpy, memmove, and memset in there, I was wondering why
memcmp wasn't there as well. It seems obvious - which makes me think
that if it's not there, then there must be some reason for it.
-- Talin
2008 Apr 13
0
[LLVMdev] Is there a reason why memcmp isn't an intrinsic?
On Apr 13, 2008, at 12:40 PM, Talin wrote:
> Since you have memcpy, memmove, and memset in there, I was wondering
> why
> memcmp wasn't there as well. It seems obvious - which makes me think
> that if it's not there, then there must be some reason for it.
Why do you want it to be an intrinsic? What does that provide?
-Chris
2008 Apr 13
1
[LLVMdev] Is there a reason why memcmp isn't an intrinsic?
...et
al, are intrinsics either. I was assuming that whatever rationale made
it beneficial to make the mem.* functions intrinsics would apply to
memcmp as well...but perhaps this is not the case?
> -Chris
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmde
2008 Jun 11
0
[LLVMdev] Combining LinkOnce and External
On Jun 9, 2008, at 7:13 PM, Talin wrote:
> Before I go writing a bug report, I want to know if the behavior I am
> seeing is intended.
>
> Before 1.3, I was able to generate a linkonce definition in one
> module,
> and an external declaration in another module and link them together,
> with the result being a defined symbol with external linkage. However,
> with the
2008 Jun 10
3
[LLVMdev] Combining LinkOnce and External
Before I go writing a bug report, I want to know if the behavior I am
seeing is intended.
Before 1.3, I was able to generate a linkonce definition in one module,
and an external declaration in another module and link them together,
with the result being a defined symbol with external linkage. However,
with the latest head, it apparently discards the linkonce version, and
my output contains
2004 Jun 09
1
[LLVMdev] Testing backend
...t;they are run, and most of the tests don't even have "main" function, so I
>>don't know if they are supposed to be run. Any suggestions?
>>
>>- Volodya
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>LLVM Developers mailing list
>>LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmde
>
> v
--
*********************************************************************
* John T. Criswell Email: criswell at uiuc.edu *
* Research Programmer...
2004 Jun 09
0
[LLVMdev] Testing backend
...n't know how
> they are run, and most of the tests don't even have "main" function, so I
> don't know if they are supposed to be run. Any suggestions?
>
> - Volodya
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:...
2004 Jun 09
3
[LLVMdev] Testing backend
I've finally managed to bring my backend to a minimally working form. I can
compile three small examples with arithmetic operations, branches and phi
operations. However, there surely is a lot of omissions and bugs.
How do I test a backend. For obvious reasons, I'd prefer a number of really
small tests, to make debugging easier. I see some number of such small tests
in