search for: llvmconstvector

...onstantVal); +long long LLVMConstIntGetSExtValue(LLVMValueRef ConstantVal); I'm not sure about these functions. There really isn't any other way to get to the value of any other constant, so why do you need this? /* Operations on composite constants */ @@ -464,6 +479,7 @@ LLVMValueRef LLVMConstVector(LLVMValueRef *ScalarConstantVals, unsigned Size); /* Constant expressions */ +unsigned LLVMGetConstOpcode(LLVMValueRef ConstantVal); This seems okay with me, but there really should be an LLVMInstruction enum defined instead of a raw unsigned value. Could you also add a LLVMConstExpr that wraps...

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: > My front-end is sync'd with the trunk now, and working well, but it > required some additional functions exposed in the C bindings.  I > hereby submit them for review and approval for inclusion in the trunk. > LLVMGetAttribute had a bug in it. Here's the revised version of the patch

My front-end is sync'd with the trunk now, and working well, but it required some additional functions exposed in the C bindings. I hereby submit them for review and approval for inclusion in the trunk. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cbindings.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 7269 bytes Desc: not available URL:

...I need to get it back as an int. Specifically, the LLVMBuildExtractValue function requires an int, not a Constant, to represent the member. I believe that GEP does as well when applied to a struct. > > >  /* Operations on composite constants */ > @@ -464,6 +479,7 @@ >  LLVMValueRef LLVMConstVector(LLVMValueRef *ScalarConstantVals, unsigned Size); > >  /* Constant expressions */ > +unsigned LLVMGetConstOpcode(LLVMValueRef ConstantVal); > > > This seems okay with me, but there really should be an LLVMInstruction > enum defined instead of a raw unsigned value. Could you als...