search for: llvmcc

On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 07:23:06PM -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > > 1. Name = llvmcc > > > > > > Why not 'llvmc' "llvm compiler"? What does the extra C mean? > > > > I dunno. Perhaps cause Misha liked it. But, you do have a point there. LLVMCC = LLVM Compiler Collection, a la GCC After all, it's going to be the "driver&quot...

On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Misha Brukman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 07:23:06PM -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > > > 1. Name = llvmcc > > > > > > > > Why not 'llvmc' "llvm compiler"? What does the extra C mean? > > > > > > I dunno. Perhaps cause Misha liked it. But, you do have a point there. > > LLVMCC = LLVM Compiler Collection, a la GCC > After all, it's...

...004-08-02 at 15:03, Chris Lattner wrote: > > Since there's been little feedback on the design document I sent out, > > some decisions are being made in order to progress the work. If you have > > strong feelings about any of these, voice them now! > > > > 1. Name = llvmcc > > Why not 'llvmc' "llvm compiler"? What does the extra C mean? I dunno. Perhaps cause Misha liked it. But, you do have a point there. For that matter, why llvmc? Its more than a compiler. It also (and mainly) links and optimizes. So, why not just "llvm" ? Re...

On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 17:31, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Misha Brukman wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 07:23:06PM -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > > > > 1. Name = llvmcc > > > > > > > > > > Why not 'llvmc' "llvm compiler"? What does the extra C mean? > > > > > > > > I dunno. Perhaps cause Misha liked it. But, you do have a point there. > > > > LLVMCC = LLVM Compiler Collection, a l...

Hi Reid, > Since there's been little feedback on the design document I sent out, > some decisions are being made in order to progress the work. If you have > strong feelings about any of these, voice them now! > > 1. Name = llvmcc I like llvmcc, but really have no strong opinion. > 2. The config file format will resemble Microsoft .ini files > (name=value in sections) I prefer the XML version of the config file format. It's well-formed and there are tools out there that can parse it already. The verbosity of...

...Lattner wrote: > > > Since there's been little feedback on the design document I sent out, > > > some decisions are being made in order to progress the work. If you have > > > strong feelings about any of these, voice them now! > > > > > > 1. Name = llvmcc > > > > Why not 'llvmc' "llvm compiler"? What does the extra C mean? > > I dunno. Perhaps cause Misha liked it. But, you do have a point there. > > For that matter, why llvmc? Its more than a compiler. It also (and > mainly) links and optimizes. So, why...

...l Wendling wrote: > Hi Reid, > > > Since there's been little feedback on the design document I sent out, > > some decisions are being made in order to progress the work. If you have > > strong feelings about any of these, voice them now! > > > > 1. Name = llvmcc > > I like llvmcc, but really have no strong opinion. I think we're slowly setting on llvmcs (LLVM Compiler Suite or Compilation System). > > > 2. The config file format will resemble Microsoft .ini files > > (name=value in sections) > > I prefer the XML versi...

LLVMers, Since there's been little feedback on the design document I sent out, some decisions are being made in order to progress the work. If you have strong feelings about any of these, voice them now! 1. Name = llvmcc 2. The config file format will resemble Microsoft .ini files (name=value in sections) 3. -O set of options will control what gets done and what kind of output is generated. I'm going to start documenting the design and usage of llvmcc in a new HTML document in the docs directory. You...

...> > llvmx - llvm eXecutive > > I like llvmcs. Contrary to the IRC discussion, I am not sure I want a > hyphen in this ... Without a hyphen, it could still be the compiler > system, with the hyphen, I'd say almost definitely computer science. :) I'm happy with llvmcs or llvmcc. For those of you who remember OPEN LOOK, I would laughingly suggest 'llvmtool'. :-) -Brian

...MP Fri Oct 15 11:35:09 CEST 2010 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5335 @ 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux I have added a bitcode library to the sample project I have modified the sample project to show my problem -- patch attached. The warning comes from Makefile.rules:1192. The check is performed over LLVMCC, set at Makefile.rules:428-443. Setting depends on LLVMCC_OPTIONS, CLANGPATH, and ENABLE_BUILT_CLANG. Previously -- I have tried with 3699261d3f49d65cee6a645c849c41cdca51a01f -- these vars was set throught the configure script, now they are not set. Thank you for the assistance, speziale.ettore at...

Hi All, Is it possible to run the test-suite with another compiler that it's not llvm-gcc? I want to run tests with Clang and our bridge+LLVM. Also, llvm-gcc is going to be deprecated soon enough, would be good to have the official way to use Clang. Or is this doc too old to reflect the current status? http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html cheers, --renato

On Jun 30, 2011, at 5:20 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > Hi All, > > Is it possible to run the test-suite with another compiler that it's > not llvm-gcc? I use --with-built-clang --with-llvmcc=clang --with-llvmcxx=clang++ --without-llvmgcc --without-llvmgxx on llvm configure line to use clang built within tree. I checkout clang sources inside my llvm/tools folder. - Devang > > I want to run tests with Clang and our bridge+LLVM. > > Also, llvm-gcc is going to be deprecated...

...te given what it does. Since we intend to be > front end language agnostic and the driver tool will support multiple > front end languages, "Compiler Collection" is appropriate for LLVM too. > > I agree that llvm is overloaded and should be avoided. So its either > llvmc or llvmcc. My vote is for the latter. What is the difference between a "compiler collection" and a "compiler"? how about llvmcs "llvm-compiler system" or something else non-cc? :) -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://nondot.org/sabre/

...Reid, > > > > > Since there's been little feedback on the design document I sent out, > > > some decisions are being made in order to progress the work. If you have > > > strong feelings about any of these, voice them now! > > > > > > 1. Name = llvmcc > > > > I like llvmcc, but really have no strong opinion. > > I think we're slowly setting on llvmcs (LLVM Compiler Suite or > Compilation System). aka llvm cool stuff > I tend to agree. I'm a strong advocate of XML myself (on other > projects). However, introd...

...to run it directly. On UNIX, that is done with #!<interpreter>. I believe ELF provides similar functionality (where exec()ing the file can load a program or library to do JIT compilation), but if it doesn't, then we lose this feature. o Compiler Driver Name I'd vote for either llvmcc (llvm compiler collection) or llvmcd (llvm compiler driver). To be more convenient, we could call it llc (LLvm Compiler) or llcd (LLvm Compiler Driver). Calling it llc would require renaming llc to something else, which might be appropriate since I view llc as a "code generator" and...

...t; x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5335 @ 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux > I have added a bitcode library to the sample project > > I have modified the sample project to show my problem -- patch attached. > > The warning comes from Makefile.rules:1192. The check is performed over > LLVMCC, set at Makefile.rules:428-443. Setting depends on > LLVMCC_OPTIONS, CLANGPATH, and ENABLE_BUILT_CLANG. Previously -- I have > tried with 3699261d3f49d65cee6a645c849c41cdca51a01f -- these vars was > set throught the configure script, now they are not set. Aha. I see. I'd forgotten to...

...gt; > > I like llvmcs. Contrary to the IRC discussion, I am not sure I want > > a hyphen in this ... Without a hyphen, it could still be the > > compiler system, with the hyphen, I'd say almost definitely computer > > science. :) > > I'm happy with llvmcs or llvmcc. I also notice that cs has the double-meaning of llvm.cs[.uiuc.edu] or just simply llvm.cs, i.e., LLVM implemented in C#. :) -- Misha Brukman :: http://misha.brukman.net :: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu

On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:31 PM, Speziale Ettore wrote: > Hi, > > I have updated llvm to the 113aa8612010434069fc5b5e09f6b2667e03e173 git > commit. I have a small llvm project that builds a bitcode library, so I > used MODULE_NAME=foo to build foo.bc. Now, I cannot build the library, > because a compatible compiler cannot be found (Makefile.rules:1052). > > I have seen that

> > > Since there's been little feedback on the design document I sent out, > > > some decisions are being made in order to progress the work. If you have > > > strong feelings about any of these, voice them now! > > > > > > 1. Name = llvmcc > > > > Why not 'llvmc' "llvm compiler"? What does the extra C mean? > > I dunno. Perhaps cause Misha liked it. But, you do have a point there. > > For that matter, why llvmc? Its more than a compiler. It also (and > mainly) links and optimizes. So, why...

...nce we intend to be > > front end language agnostic and the driver tool will support multiple > > front end languages, "Compiler Collection" is appropriate for LLVM too. > > > > I agree that llvm is overloaded and should be avoided. So its either > > llvmc or llvmcc. My vote is for the latter. > > What is the difference between a "compiler collection" and a "compiler"? > how about llvmcs "llvm-compiler system" or something else non-cc? :) I think that we can really pick any name that we want. We don't have to go alon...