search for: llvmbuildgep

...re out how to get and set array indices from the c interface. so to get an element I'm calling tindex = *fn\SymbolTable(*index\name) index = LLVMBuildLoad(builder,tindex,"index") arr = *fn\SymbolTable(*array\name) arrptr = LLVMBuildLoad(Builder,arr,"arrayptr") tmp = LLVMBuildGEP(Builder,arrptr,index,0,"ptr") ptr = llvmBuildload(Builder,tmp,"ele") and to set tarr = *fn\SymbolTable(*array\name) Arr = LLVMBuildLoad(builder,tarr,"array") tval = *fn\SymbolTable(*value\name) val = LLVMBuildLoad(builder,tval,"val") tindex = *fn\S...

...u have more person in that thread saying they'd need it and have to do various workaround to get things done without it. > >> - Let's say you remove types from pointers. >> >> This is a change that can be seen coming up. So, one should fairly early >> on add an LLVMBuildGEP2 function that takes the extra type argument. Leave >> the old function name around for now (deprecated), because with the current >> state of LLVM, it can continue to work just fine. >> >> When LLVM is changed to *actually* remove all pointer types in its core, >> the...

...keep working. There's no real need to remove the old deprecated functions -- they'll keep working as well as they ever did with the smaller-valued attributes. - Let's say you remove types from pointers. This is a change that can be seen coming up. So, one should fairly early on add an LLVMBuildGEP2 function that takes the extra type argument. Leave the old function name around for now (deprecated), because with the current state of LLVM, it can continue to work just fine. When LLVM is changed to *actually* remove all pointer types in its core, then the LLVMBuildGEP function cannot reasonabl...

Attached is what I got thus far. What I'm struggling with is proper integration in build system. What is in there is just wild guesses from my side, both on autoconf and cmake variants. It would be great if someone with proper knowledge of the buildsystems could have a look. Also I'm not sure how to properly handle compilation on msvc - clearly "-std=c11 -Wstrict-prototypes" is

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 10:34 PM, deadal nix via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > 2015-08-16 21:51 GMT-07:00 Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>: >> >> The promise of stability. We don't promise that the C++ API will stay >> stable. >> > > > Why was that promise be made in the first place ? Has it been made in the >