Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "llvmaddreturnattr".
2010 Dec 22
0
[LLVMdev] the optional function return attribute and the llvm-c bindings
...If so, then it would be nice to have some guidance on naming issues.
I do not propose to change the names or semantics of any existing functions.
I propose to add the following declarations to <llvm-c/Core.h> along with corresponding definitions in $LLVM/lib/VMCore/Core.cpp:
extern void LLVMAddReturnAttr(LLVMValueRef Fn, LLVMAttribute PA);
extern void LLVMRemoveReturnAttr(LLVMValueRef Fn, LLVMAttribute PA);
I also propose to add the corresponding OCaml functions to the "Operations on functions" section of the Llvm module in the OCaml bindings too, of course:
(** [add_return_attr f a...
2010 Dec 21
2
[LLVMdev] the optional function return attribute and the llvm-c bindings
On Dec 21, 2010, at 00:43, Duncan Sands wrote:
>
> IIRC the function return value is considered to be the parameter with index 0.
> The function itself is considered to be the parameter with index ~0U.
Yes, that's what the documentation seems to say is the proper mode for indexing the return parameter, but when I set an attribute on the parameter with index zero, it gets applied to