search for: llvm_uses_libcxx

...hen probably we can put the logic of determining the set of flags required for libc++ into CMake build rules and use CMake variable like COMPILER_RT_USES_LIBCXX. Does the attached patch solve a problem for you? If you're building LLVM/Clang tree, however, we may want to hoist this to smth. like LLVM_USES_LIBCXX. > >> I don't know the specific needs of either libc++ or the sanitizer on mac; >> instead this should be answered by one of the folks actively working on >> that area. There are several on the list that can likely help. >> > > >> _____________________...

...put the logic > of determining the set of flags required for libc++ into CMake build rules > and use CMake variable like COMPILER_RT_USES_LIBCXX. Does the attached > patch solve a problem for you? If you're building LLVM/Clang tree, > however, we may want to hoist this to smth. like LLVM_USES_LIBCXX. > > > Yes, that works, when I (manually) set the COMPILER_RT_USES_LIBCXX flag. I > was wondering if that flag could actually be set when detecting the > -stdlib=libc++ flag... > r174699 should do this. > > -- Erik. > > -- Alexey Samsonov, MSK -------------- next...

...ly we can put the logic > of determining the set of flags required for libc++ into CMake build rules and use CMake variable like COMPILER_RT_USES_LIBCXX. Does the attached > patch solve a problem for you? If you're building LLVM/Clang tree, however, we may want to hoist this to smth. like LLVM_USES_LIBCXX. Yes, that works, when I (manually) set the COMPILER_RT_USES_LIBCXX flag. I was wondering if that flag could actually be set when detecting the -stdlib=libc++ flag... -- Erik. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm...

+samsonov, glider On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen at me.com>wrote: > >> Hi Chandler, >> >> If I remember correctly, you are the de-facto maintainer for the >> CMake-built-mainainer, so..: >> > > Sure, but I'm often busy.

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen at me.com>wrote: > Hi Chandler, > > If I remember correctly, you are the de-facto maintainer for the > CMake-built-mainainer, so..: > Sure, but I'm often busy. You're better off using the development mailing list for questions such as this, and I've moved the conversation there. > I have a