search for: llvm_src

...ked for me. I am using llvm 3.2 only and following http://safecode.cs.illinois.edu/docs/Install.html So for I am able to make inside llvm/projects/poolalloc by doing such cosmetic changes. Now, when I tried to make inside llvm/projects/safecode, I see another error. kpawar at KPAWAR-LT ~/SAFECode/LLVM_SRC/llvm/projects/safecode $ /usr/bin/clang -cc1 -triple i386-pc-windows-cygnus -emit-obj -disable-free -disable-llvm-verifier -main-file-name Parser.cpp -mrelocation-model static -relaxed-aliasing -fmath-errno -masm-verbose -mconstructor-aliases -target-cpu pentium4 -target-linker-version 2.25 -dwarf-...

.../lib/LLVMDataStructure.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/poolalloc.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/AssistDS.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/libpoolalloc_fl_rt.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/libpoolalloc_rt.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/libpa_pre_rt.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/libcount.a On cygwin I observed kpawar at KPAWAR-LT ~/SAFECode/LLVM_SRC/llvm/projects/poolalloc $ find . -name *.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/libAssistDS.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/libcount.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/libLLVMDataStructure.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/libpa_pre_rt.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/libpoolalloc.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/libpoolalloc_fl_rt.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/lib...

...= Flag: verbosity 3 Flag: use_traces 1 Flag: timeout 100 Flag: max_len 16384 Seed: 3259211893 PreferSmall: 0 #0 READ units: 4975 exec/s: 0 #1 pulse cov: 32410 bits: 30791 indir: 714 units: 4975 exec/s: 0 NEW0: 32410 L 13869 ==31301==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: /home/brian/src/fuzzpy/llvm_src/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_coverage_libcdep.cc:467 "((n % 16)) == ((0))" (0x1, 0x0) #0 0x11d3b7 in __asan::AsanCheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long) /home/brian/src/fuzzpy/llvm_src/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib...

...max_len 16384 >> Seed: 3259211893 >> PreferSmall: 0 >> #0 READ units: 4975 exec/s: 0 >> #1 pulse cov: 32410 bits: 30791 indir: 714 units: 4975 exec/s: 0 >> NEW0: 32410 L 13869 >> ==31301==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: >> /home/brian/src/fuzzpy/llvm_src/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_coverage_libcdep.cc:467 >> "((n % 16)) == ((0))" (0x1, 0x0) >> #0 0x11d3b7 in __asan::AsanCheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, >> unsigned long long, unsigned long long) >> /home/brian/src/fuzzpy/ll...

...>> PreferSmall: 0 >>>> #0 READ units: 4975 exec/s: 0 >>>> #1 pulse cov: 32410 bits: 30791 indir: 714 units: 4975 exec/s: 0 >>>> NEW0: 32410 L 13869 >>>> ==31301==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: >>>> /home/brian/src/fuzzpy/llvm_src/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_coverage_libcdep.cc:467 >>>> "((n % 16)) == ((0))" (0x1, 0x0) >>>> #0 0x11d3b7 in __asan::AsanCheckFailed(char const*, int, char >>>> const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long) >>&g...

First off, thanks -- this is a pretty great library and it feels like I'm learning a lot. I'm getting some more experience with libfuzzer and finding that I have a couple of questions: - How does libfuzzer decide to write a new test file? What distinguishes this one from all the other cases for which new test inputs were not written? Must be something about the path taken through the

...nts/20150811/0323f018/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- #0 atomic_exchange<__sanitizer::atomic_uint32_t> (mo=__sanitizer::memory_order_acquire, v=2, a=0x640000001290) #1 __sanitizer::BlockingMutex::Lock (this=this at entry=0x640000001290) at /home/brian/tmp/testing/llvm_src/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cc:471 #2 0x0000000000447899 in GenericScopedLock (mu=mu at entry=0x640000001290, this=<synthetic pointer>) #3 __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<105553116266496ul, 4398046511104ul, 0ul, __sanitizer::SizeClassMap<17ul, 128u...

...efile. Also, are you using the code from Peter's Github repository? I think Peter made this change in his code already. Regards, John Criswell On 7/29/15 11:27 AM, Nikhil Reddy Kothapally wrote: > llvm[4]: Compiling PoolAllocate.cpp for Release+Asserts build > /home/NIKHILREDDY/WORK/LLVM_SRC/projects/poolalloc/lib/PoolAllocate/PoolAllocate.cpp: > In member function ‘virtual bool > llvm::PoolAllocate::runOnModule(llvm::Module&)’: > /home/NIKHILREDDY/WORK/LLVM_SRC/projects/poolalloc/lib/PoolAllocate/PoolAllocate.cpp:403:16: > error: ‘class llvm::Constant’ has no member...

...it happened in phase 3 suggests some hardware malfunction of mine? Or are there tests executed on phase 3 that aren't attempted on earlier phases? $ CC=clang CXX=clang++ ./test-release.sh -release 3.7.1 -rc 2 -j1 -openmp -triple armv7l-ubuntu15.10-linux-gnueabihf ... cd /home/brian/src/fuzzpy/llvm_src/llvm/utils/release/rc2/Phase3/openmp/src && /home/brian/src/fuzzpy/llvm_src/llvm/utils/release/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-3.7.1-rc2.install/usr/local/bin/clang -o test-touch-rt/test-touch /home/brian/src/fuzzpy/llvm_src/llvm/utils/release/rc2/openmp.src/runtime/src/test-touch.c -lpthread /...

...sing git bisect. I thought I would share them here, in the hope that they're useful for others. The main difficulty was to check out the version of clang and compiler-rt that would compile with a given LLVM revision. I used the following code in the bisect script: checkout() { cd $LLVM_SRC local committer_date="$(git log --pretty=format:%cd -n1 'HEAD')" cd $LLVM_SRC/tools/clang git checkout "$(git rev-list -n 1 --before="$committer_date" origin/google/testing)" cd $LLVM_SRC/projects/compiler-rt git checkout...

...***************************** dnl * Set the location of various third-party software packages dnl ************************************************************************** dnl Location of LLVM source code AC_ARG_WITH(llvmsrc,AS_HELP_STRING([--with-llvmsrc],[Location of LLVM Source Code]),AC_SUBST(LLVM_SRC,[$withval]),AC_SUBST(LLVM_SRC,[`cd ${srcdir}/../..; pwd`])) AC_CONFIG_COMMANDS([llvm_src],[],[llvm_src=$LLVM_SRC]) dnl Location of LLVM object code AC_ARG_WITH(llvmobj,AS_HELP_STRING([--with-llvmobj],[Location of LLVM Object Code]),AC_SUBST(LLVM_OBJ,[$withval]),AC_SUBST(LLVM_OBJ,[`cd ../..; pwd`])...

Hi, There was one problem in -rc1, so we had to do another release candidate. -rc2 has now been tagged and is ready for testing. -Tom

...0xb7dbb027 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #1 0xb7dbc747 in abort () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #2 0xb7eb6721 in uw_init_context_1 () from ${LLVM_FRONT}/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 #3 0xbf9fd140 in ?? () #4 0xbf9fcf20 in ?? () #5 0x00000064 in ?? () #6 0x082a02cd in llvm::Optimize (M=0x85bf330) at ${LLVM_SRC}/tools/llvm-ld/Optimize.cpp:180 #7 0x082a7161 in main (argc=17, argv=0xbf9fd454, envp=0xbf9fd49c) at ${LLVM_SRC}/tools/llvm-ld/llvm-ld.cpp:467 The exception raised apparently was not caused by the first warning message, but resulted from the following snippet of ${LLVM_SRC}/tools/llvm-ld/Optim...

...g to compile the SAFECode in Cygwin Environment to work for windows. used make -j4 command to make the files in cygwin i have got this error make[5]: Leaving directory '/home/uidr7475/Work/LLVM_OBJ/projects/safecode/tools/clang/include' /usr/bin/cp: cannot stat '/home/uidr7475/Work/LLVM_SRC/projects/safecode/tools/clang/lib/Makefile': No such file or directory make[5]: Entering directory '/home/uidr7475/Work/LLVM_OBJ/projects/safecode/tools/clang/lib' make[5]: *** No rule to make target 'all'. Stop. make[5]: Leaving directory '/home/uidr7475/Work/LLVM_OBJ/proj...

Hi, all I'm using profiling mechanism provided by LLVM. What I did is, $ ./${LLVM_SRC}/utils/profile.pl hello.bc But it turned out that llvm-prof failed to interpret the profile dump, llvm-prof gave me the error message below. llvm-prof: Unknown packet type #5! Any idea? Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia...

I’ve run into a bizarre error in which LLVM_SRC/Makefile.rules is trying to access a file that doesn’t exist, even though I’ve made sure to correctly reference the needed file. In LLVM_SRC/Makefile.rules, lines 183 and 184 reference the variable ConfigStatusScript, which is defined as $(PROJ_OBJ_ROOT)/config.status. Given the way PROJ_OBJ_ROOT...

...especially when it builds the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc. Is there a way to prevent cmake generating Makefiles that rebuilds all the tablegen files? Here is my command line to run cmake for generating Makefiles: cmake -G “Unix Makefiles” -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=“X86" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug $(LLVM_SRC) The cmake version is 3.13.4. And I did not experience the same behavior on a Linux. Thanks, - Jie -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191020/870466c8/attachment.html>

Does a transform exist to breakdown the GEP? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111206/e88dddfe/attachment.html>

...dbg.cu !11 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C89, file: !3, producer: "julia", isOptimized: true, runtimeVersion: 0,emissionKind: FullDebug, enums : !12) This was generated by verifyModule(*GPUModule,&(llvm::errs())From whithin PPCGCodeGeneration.cpp in Polly. >From <llvm_src>/test/Verifier/dbg-orphaned-compileunit.ll, I understand that the debug info, of a compile unit, represented by !11 is missing from llvm.dbg.cu. What does this mean ? What could have caused this problem and how can I fix it ? Thank You, Sanjay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML at...

...c/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/ExecutionEngineBindings.cpp:188: undefined reference to `llvm::setFunctionAttributes(llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::TargetOptions const&, llvm::Module&, bool)' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status This is my CMake command line: cmake -G Ninja $LLVM_SRC -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -DLLVM_BUILD_TESTS=False -DLLVM_INCLUDE_EXAMPLES=False -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=True -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="ARM;X86;AArch64" -DPYTHON_EXECUTABLE=/usr/bin/python2 Static object compilation is unaffected. Any ideas? cheers, --renato