search for: llvm_site_config

...ential here. Yawn. > procData = [None] * len(procs) > procData[-1] = procs[-1].communicate() I am invoking python directly on windows to run the unit tests. C:\Python27\python.exe C:\build\llvm\Release\bin\llvm-lit.py -v -j 12 --param build_mode=Release --param build_config=Win32 llvm_site_config=C:\llvm_on_win\nightly\build\llvm\tools\polly\test\lit.site .cfg test Note: If I invoke with "-j 1" , the unit tests finish but took a lot of time. There is no deadlock. I am using python version 2.7.6. At this moment, I believe the issue is caused by stdout filling the OS buffer the...

...after applying the attached patch, some tests run just fine. (test's with grep and spaces are broken as are some others). Here's how I run the test I wrote: C:\Users\Michael\Projects\llvm>"C:\Python26\python.exe" C:/Users/Michael/Proj ects/llvm/utils/lit/lit.py --param llvm_site_config=C:/Users/Michael/Projects /llvm-build/VS9/test/lit.site.cfg --param llvm_unit_site_config=C:/Users/Mich ael/Projects/llvm-build/VS9/test/Unit/lit.site.cfg -v C:/Users/Michael/Pro jects/llvm-build/VS9/test/MC/COFF/basic-coff.s - Michael Spencer -------------- next part -------------- A non...

While running the llvm tests, I get several error messages like these: [1/1] Running the LLVM regression tests FAILED: cd /home/steve/llvm-build/test && /usr/local/bin/python /home/steve/llvm/utils/lit/lit.py --param build_config=. --param build_mode=Release -sv --param llvm_site_config=/home/steve/llvm-build/test/lit.site.cfg --param llvm_unit_site_config=/home/steve/llvm-build/test/Unit/lit.site.cfg /home/steve/llvm-build/tes t -- Testing: 6378 tests, 4 threads -- Testing: 0 FAIL: LLVM :: BugPoint/metadata.ll (351 of 6378) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: BugPoint/metadat...

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Nathan Jeffords <blunted2night at gmail.com> wrote: > This is cool, I was looking into something like this, but hit a little bit > of a wall, and then got sidetracked on another project. I was going to use > llc to generate COFF object files as opposed to clang. Seems to me llc would > give better control over what was generated and would also not

...s go away when I disable static libs aka > -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF , with that only 2 regtest failures are left: > > > [ 1314s] FAILED: cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/stage2/test && > /usr/bin/python /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/utils/lit/lit.py -sv > --param > llvm_site_config=/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/stage2/test/lit.site.cfg > --param > llvm_unit_site_config=/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/stage2/test/Unit/lit.site.cfg > /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/stage2/test > [ 1314s] lit.py: run.py:223: note: failed to initialize multiprocessing > [ 1314...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "İsmail Dönmez" <ismail at donmez.ws> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 7:18:48 AM > Subject: Re: Lots of regtest failures on PPC64/Linux > > > Hi Hal, > > > > > > On

...hile running the llvm tests, I get several error messages like these: > > [1/1] Running the LLVM regression tests > FAILED: cd /home/steve/llvm-build/test && /usr/local/bin/python /home/steve/llvm/utils/lit/lit.py --param build_config=. --param build_mode=Release -sv --param > llvm_site_config=/home/steve/llvm-build/test/lit.site.cfg --param llvm_unit_site_config=/home/steve/llvm-build/test/Unit/lit.site.cfg /home/steve/llvm-build/tes > t > -- Testing: 6378 tests, 4 threads -- > Testing: 0 > FAIL: LLVM :: BugPoint/metadata.ll (351 of 6378) > ******************** TEST '...

I have not, I was going to look at it tonight. I tried an earlier version and got stuck trying to figure out how to invoke lit.py. Looking over ' http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html' its still clear to be how to do that. In my setup, I have an out of tree build. Could you give be an example of the command line to invoke the tests? -Nathan On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Michael

On Jun 14, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Nathan Jeffords <blunted2night at gmail.com> wrote: > Michael, > > I have not made any changes since I last posted a patch. If you > would like to make the final updates, thats fine by me. I don't mind > making the changes either, I can have them done this evening as well. I'll let you do it then, along with sorting out the macros.