Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "llvm_options".
2008 Oct 31
3
[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn
...f %{!ffree-form:-ffixed-form} %(cc1_options) %{J*} %{I*}\
+ f951 %|.f %{!ffree-form:-ffixed-form} %(cc1_options) \
+ %<Wformat %<Wformat-security %<Wno-format-extra-args %<Wno-format-
zero-length %<Wno-nonull \
+ %{J*} %{I*}\
"/* LLVM LOCAL */" \
%(llvm_options) \
-fpreprocessed %{!nostdinc:-I finclude%s} %{!fsyntax-only:%
(invoke_as)}}}}", 0, 0, 0},
@@ -25,21 +27,27 @@
"cc1 -E -lang-fortran -traditional-cpp -D_LANGUAGE_FORTRAN %
(cpp_options) \
%{E|M|MM:%(cpp_debug_options)}\
%{!M:%{!MM:%{!E: -o %|.f95 |\n\
- f9...
2008 Oct 31
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn
On Oct 30, 2008, at 5:23 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm
> svn. I find everytime I compile something with llvm-gfortran that
> I get a series of warning messages...
>
> f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid for C/C++/
> ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
> f951: warning: command line option
2008 Oct 31
5
[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn
Chris and Bill,
I have tested the proposed patch from...
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-August/016490.html
under i686-apple-darwin9 and it solves the problems building gfortran
from llvm svn. The resulting compiler works fine so can we get that
patch in before 2.4 is release?
Jack
ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm
svn. I find