search for: llvm_no_staticinit

...but before brute-force fixing this problem, I'd like outline the incremental steps that will lead to a desirable long term solution. We want infrastructure in place to provide an evolutionary path. In the near term, clients who need llvm-the-library with no static initializers will build with LLVM_NO_STATICINIT. In this mode, existing users of cl::opt will default to being optimized away as constant initializers, and those options will not be available for command line parsing. A new option class will need be defined, cl::toolopt. Initially, this will share the implementation and API with cl::opt. The on...

...fixing this problem, I'd like outline the incremental steps > that will lead to a desirable long term solution. We want infrastructure in > place to provide an evolutionary path. > > In the near term, clients who need llvm-the-library with no static > initializers will build with LLVM_NO_STATICINIT. In this mode, existing > users of cl::opt will default to being optimized away as constant > initializers, and those options will not be available for command line > parsing. > > A new option class will need be defined, cl::toolopt. Initially, this will > share the implementation...

...re brute-force fixing this problem, I'd like outline the incremental steps that will lead to a desirable long term solution. We want infrastructure in place to provide an evolutionary path. > > In the near term, clients who need llvm-the-library with no static initializers will build with LLVM_NO_STATICINIT. In this mode, existing users of cl::opt will default to being optimized away as constant initializers, and those options will not be available for command line parsing. > > A new option class will need be defined, cl::toolopt. Initially, this will share the implementation and API with cl::op...

...force fixing this problem, I'd like outline the incremental steps that will lead to a desirable long term solution. We want infrastructure in place to provide an evolutionary path. >> >> In the near term, clients who need llvm-the-library with no static initializers will build with LLVM_NO_STATICINIT. In this mode, existing users of cl::opt will default to being optimized away as constant initializers, and those options will not be available for command line parsing. >> >> A new option class will need be defined, cl::toolopt. Initially, this will share the implementation and API wi...

...this problem, I'd like > outline the incremental steps that will lead to a desirable long > term solution. We want infrastructure in place to provide an > evolutionary path. > > In the near term, clients who need llvm-the-library with no static > initializers will build with LLVM_NO_STATICINIT. In this mode, > existing users of cl::opt will default to being optimized away as > constant initializers, and those options will not be available for > command line parsing. > > A new option class will need be defined, cl::toolopt. Initially, this > will share the implementatio...

...re brute-force fixing this problem, I'd like outline the incremental steps that will lead to a desirable long term solution. We want infrastructure in place to provide an evolutionary path. > > In the near term, clients who need llvm-the-library with no static initializers will build with LLVM_NO_STATICINIT. In this mode, existing users of cl::opt will default to being optimized away as constant initializers, and those options will not be available for command line parsing. > > A new option class will need be defined, cl::toolopt. Initially, this will share the implementation and API with cl::op...

...force fixing this problem, I'd like outline the incremental steps that will lead to a desirable long term solution. We want infrastructure in place to provide an evolutionary path. >> >> In the near term, clients who need llvm-the-library with no static initializers will build with LLVM_NO_STATICINIT. In this mode, existing users of cl::opt will default to being optimized away as constant initializers, and those options will not be available for command line parsing. >> >> A new option class will need be defined, cl::toolopt. Initially, this will share the implementation and API wi...

...ixing this problem, I'd like outline the incremental steps that will lead to a desirable long term solution. We want infrastructure in place to provide an evolutionary path. >>> >>> In the near term, clients who need llvm-the-library with no static initializers will build with LLVM_NO_STATICINIT. In this mode, existing users of cl::opt will default to being optimized away as constant initializers, and those options will not be available for command line parsing. >>> >>> A new option class will need be defined, cl::toolopt. Initially, this will share the implementation and...

...I'd like outline the incremental >> steps that will lead to a desirable long term solution. We want >> infrastructure in place to provide an evolutionary path. >> >> In the near term, clients who need llvm-the-library with no static >> initializers will build with LLVM_NO_STATICINIT. In this mode, existing >> users of cl::opt will default to being optimized away as constant >> initializers, and those options will not be available for command line >> parsing. >> >> A new option class will need be defined, cl::toolopt. Initially, this >> will...