Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "llvm_lib_dirs".
Did you mean:
llvm_lib_dir
2007 Jun 07
2
[LLVMdev] How to call native functions from bytecode run in JIT?
Hello,
can anyone help me calling native functions from LLVM-Bytecode
functions run in the JIT?
I have a program which creates an LLVM execution engine and adds
modules and functions
to it on the fly. I need to call some native functions of my program
from bytecode functions which causes some troubles as it appears not
to be documented. My test scenario works like the following:
I have
2007 Jun 10
0
[LLVMdev] How to call native functions from bytecode run in JIT?
Are you able make calls to well known external functions such as
printf? As far as I known, this capability is well tested on x86 /
Linux.
I am wondering if there is some name mangling issue?
Evan
On Jun 7, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Jan Rehders wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can anyone help me calling native functions from LLVM-Bytecode
> functions run in the JIT?
>
> I have a program
2012 Jun 28
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
Using cmake should be the right thing if you'd like to support windows, but
it seems that no enough effort on this build system, eg
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12157 three months passed, I'am I bit
familiar with cmake, so if there tasks pending for absence of developer,
I'd like to join.
cmake is not perfect but it's open, but many improvements maybe merged
upstream.
2007 Jun 30
1
[LLVMdev] How to call native functions from bytecode run in JIT?
Hi,
> If I recall correctly, in Linux you get the message:
>
> PPCJITInfo.cpp:382: failed assertion `ResultPtr >= -(1 << 23) &&
> ResultPtr < (1 << 23) && "Relocation out of range!"'
>
>
> Right? But on OS X you don't have this messsage?
Not exactly. There seem to be two problems. Your patch fixes one of
them: in OS X I
2012 Jun 28
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
On 28 Jun 2012, at 08:58, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
> It's a chicken and egg problems. Xcode users don't use cmake because it
> generates poor Xcode projects.
So what *do* XCode users do (to build llvm/clang)? Do they somehow set
up XCode to build using the autoconf build system? Do they build
llvm/clang outside of XCode?
If the answer to either of the last two questions is
2012 Jun 28
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
...ct in
LLVMConfig.cmake if it is being processed on an installed or uninstalled
build and assign LLVM_TOOLS_BINARY_DIR accordingly. This can be done,
for instance, comparing the values of CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_FILE and
LLVM_INSTALL_PREFIX, with the necessary adjustments. Ditto for
LLVM_INCLUDE_DIRS and LLVM_LIB_DIRS.
The other two variables your patch touches (LLVM_INSTALL_PREFIX and
CMAKE_MODULE_PATH) does not need such corrections, as the former is
precisely the *intended* location for an installed build and the later
needs modification only for uninstalled builds, as the comment above the
IF hints.
Apart...