search for: llvm_is_multithread

...c1f01b8b518bdba89aba059ab14175#diff-bb772a7e6d4ebf2b46c6d42c95f40ddf>: (xref https://reviews.llvm.org/D4216 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D4216>). The rationale in the patch doesn’t make sense to me - this mode had nothing to do with the old LLVM global lock, this had to do with whether llvm::llvm_is_multithreaded() returned true or false … which all the locking stuff is guarded on. Would it make sense to re-enable this, or am I missing something? -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200411/65dbc0...

...er audience, to make sure this is done correctly: 1) Should support multi-threading be a compile-time or runtime parameter in LLVM? Currently it is both. It is compile-time through the use of the define LLVM_ENABLE_THREADS, and it is runtime through the use of functions llvm_start_multithreaded, llvm_is_multithreaded, etc. I and some others feel like runtime support for multi-threading could be removed, and it should be compile-time only. However, I am not aware of all the ways in which this is being used, so this is where I would like some feedback. The issues I have with runtime multithreading support ar...