Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "llvm_has_initializer_lists".
2015 Feb 16
2
[LLVMdev] Do we still need LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS?
Currently, LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS is set based on
__has_feature(cxx_generalized_initializers) && !defined(_MSC_VER)
Based on the docs, we should be able to drop the _MSC_VER check now that
we've moved to VS2013. Can somebody confirm that?
The other problem is that GCC doesn't recognize __has_feature, so this
is...
2015 Feb 17
2
[LLVMdev] Do we still need LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS?
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:30 PM, David Majnemer
<david.majnemer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Currently, LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS is set based on
>>
>> __has_feature(cxx_generalized_initializers) && !defined(_MSC_VER)
>>
>> Based on the docs, we should be able to drop the _MSC_VER check now that
>> we've moved to VS2013. Can somebody confirm that?
>>
>
> MSDN claims that...