Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "llvm_handle_to_typ".
Did you mean:
llvm_handle_to_type
2010 Jan 26
2
[LLVMdev] another minor problem with the ocaml binding
everyone--
I notice that Llvm.llvm_handle_to_type is actually defined to create a type handle from a type, rather than vice versa as its name would imply. Should I send a patch to change the name of the function to reflect its type better, or should I just lump it?
—
j h woodyatt <jhw at conjury.org>
http://jhw.vox.com/
2010 Feb 07
0
[LLVMdev] another minor problem with the ocaml binding
...o me the name implies that it creates a handle to the type given, i guess
if you look at it in context of the ocaml conversion functions some people
may think otherwise.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:49 PM, james woodyatt <jhw at conjury.org> wrote:
> everyone--
>
> I notice that Llvm.llvm_handle_to_type is actually defined to create a type
> handle from a type, rather than vice versa as its name would imply. Should
> I send a patch to change the name of the function to reflect its type
> better, or should I just lump it?
>
>
> —
> j h woodyatt <jhw at conjury.org>
>...