Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "llvm_cxx".
Did you mean:
llvm_ctx
2013 Jan 05
4
[LLVMdev] Building llvm from source with clang instead of gcc
...C and CXX to point to the clang/clang++
> binaries before running configure.
Do I give the full path to the executable, or just the executable name
if it is already in the PATH, for those environment variables ?
It would have been much better if the environment variables were named
LLVM_CC and LLVM_CXX for the obvious reason that CC and CXX are very
common names.
I actually found out that llvm/configure will choose clang if it is
found in the path. This contradicts what is written at
http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#requirements, where it says it
will use the first GCC it finds. Perhaps...
2013 Jan 05
0
[LLVMdev] Building llvm from source with clang instead of gcc
On 1/5/2013 11:48 AM, Edward Diener wrote:
>
> It would have been much better if the environment variables were named
> LLVM_CC and LLVM_CXX for the obvious reason that CC and CXX are very
> common names.
Actually, the variables CC and CXX are used exactly as they are always
used: to set the C and C++ compiler. Frankly, I don't see why you would
prefer to use different ones.
-Krzysztof
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc....
2013 Jan 05
2
[LLVMdev] Building llvm from source with clang instead of gcc
Is it possible to build llvm with a previous version of clang installed
as a binary ? If so, how do I get llvm/configure to use the binary
version of clang rather than gcc to build the latest version of llvm ?
2013 Jan 05
0
[LLVMdev] Building llvm from source with clang instead of gcc
On 1/5/2013 7:10 AM, Edward Diener wrote:
> Is it possible to build llvm with a previous version of clang installed
> as a binary ? If so, how do I get llvm/configure to use the binary
> version of clang rather than gcc to build the latest version of llvm ?
>
Set environment variables CC and CXX to point to the clang/clang++
binaries before running configure.
-Krzysztof
--