Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "llvm_compiler_rt_freebsd_arch".
Did you mean:
llvm_compiler_rt_freebsd_archs
2015 Jun 01
4
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Ideas on improving Compiler-RT CMake
...lt;os>.<ext>
As a second example, if you were on Windows building a Clang to target only FreeBSD when you configured your build directory there would only be an out-of-tree-style cross-compile generated for your target architecture against FreeBSD. The command line setting here would be:
LLVM_COMPILER_RT_FREEBSD_ARCHS="x86;x86_64"
This would generate binary outputs in the format:
libclangrt_<lib>.<arch>.<ext>
Similarly if you were on linux targeting linux you’d only get an in-tree build with outputs:
libclangrt_<lib>.<arch>.<ext>
The cross-compile builds will be...
2015 Jun 02
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Ideas on improving Compiler-RT CMake
...re on Windows building a Clang to
>> target only FreeBSD when you configured your build directory there
>> would only be an out-of-tree-style cross-compile generated for your
>> target architecture against FreeBSD. The command line setting here
>> would be:
>>
>> LLVM_COMPILER_RT_FREEBSD_ARCHS="x86;x86_64"
>>
>> This would generate binary outputs in the format:
>> libclangrt_<lib>.<arch>.<ext>
>>
>> Similarly if you were on linux targeting linux you’d only get an
>> in-tree build with outputs: libclangrt_<lib>.<arc...
2015 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Ideas on improving Compiler-RT CMake
...;
>
> As a second example, if you were on Windows building a Clang to target only FreeBSD when you configured your build directory there would only be an out-of-tree-style cross-compile generated for your target architecture against FreeBSD. The command line setting here would be:
>
> LLVM_COMPILER_RT_FREEBSD_ARCHS="x86;x86_64"
>
> This would generate binary outputs in the format:
> libclangrt_<lib>.<arch>.<ext>
>
> Similarly if you were on linux targeting linux you’d only get an in-tree build with outputs:
> libclangrt_<lib>.<arch>.<ext>
>...