search for: llvm4

Tom - In terms of release testing - What about using OpenSUSE build service? It could be possible to setup a toolchain and try to build a ton of packages. Most of this could be easily automated and you may significantly extend the amount of code coverage you get. I don't think build service is able to run make test, but you'd possibly flush out build and link issues. (As well as seeing how

I'm trying to compile LLVM with musl libc library. The compilation process fails on the following: x86_64-linux-musl-g++ -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -DLLVM_BUILD_GLOBAL_ISEL -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -Ilib/Support -I../lib/Support -Iinclude -I../include -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -std=c++11 -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter

...ff Grab-bag of small Ada fixes. 10-fold_build2.diff Convert fold_build2 to fold+build2. 11-tree_invariant.diff Backport recompute_tree_invariant_for_addr_expr from 4.3. 12-optimize.diff The Ada front-end makes use of the optimization level (-O1 etc), however the level is not available in gcc-llvm4. Pretend the optimization level is 2, until a better solution is found. 13-optabs.diff Remove all uses of optabs by Ada. These seem to be left-over from older gcc versions: while optabs are initialized, they are not actually used. 14-decl_rtl.diff Use the LLVM version of make_decl_rtl when co...

...old_build2.diff > Convert fold_build2 to fold+build2. > > 11-tree_invariant.diff > Backport recompute_tree_invariant_for_addr_expr from 4.3. > > 12-optimize.diff > The Ada front-end makes use of the optimization level (-O1 etc), > however the level is not available in gcc-llvm4. Pretend the > optimization > level is 2, until a better solution is found. > > 13-optabs.diff > Remove all uses of optabs by Ada. These seem to be left-over from > older gcc versions: while optabs are initialized, they are not > actually > used. > > 14-decl_rtl...