search for: llvm10

Hello; I am working on porting a tool written for LLVM3.5 to LLVM10. There used to be a call instruction with the signature static CallInst * Create (Value *F, Value *Actual, const Twine &NameStr="", Instruction *InsertBefore=0) Can anyone please explain what it supposed to do? What was F and Actual? Thank you so much. -- Dr. Arnamoy Bhattachary...

...eter Waller via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> As discussed before Christmas, this is a reminder that we intend to >> merge flang on the 13th January (next Monday) before the llvm-10 branch. > > > Why is it targeting pre-llvm10 branching? Are we expecting to ship anything in LLVM 10? If so I would have expected it to land much much earlier to be able to stabilize during the development phase long before the branching point. I was wondering about this too. I'm not necessarily opposed, but wouldn't it make sense to...

...LLVM next week. These issues will be worked on after commit. Does anyone feel passionately that any of the above points need to be addressed in the code before we can merge? Does anyone feel there is anything missing from that list? Given Mehdi and Hans' query about why this needs to go into LLVM10. Unless anyone has any good reason, perhaps we could postpone until after the branch, perhaps by one week to January 20th? That would give us some more time to bottom out what changes need to be made before we can accept the code and give us time to make any changes that block inclusion (assuming t...

Hi All, As discussed before Christmas, this is a reminder that we intend to merge flang on the 13th January (next Monday) before the llvm-10 branch. At the moment I'm proposing to do it at 10am GMT. I can be flexible on this point if it requires close coordination with anyone in another timezone, just let me know. Previous discussion was in [llvm-dev] Flang landing in the monorepo

On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 14:24, Arnamoy Bhattacharyya via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I am working on porting a tool written for LLVM3.5 to LLVM10. There > used to be a call instruction with the signature > static CallInst * Create (Value *F, Value *Actual, const Twine > &NameStr="", Instruction *InsertBefore=0) > > Can anyone please explain what it supposed to do? What was F and Actual? I can only find anythin...

...d then create the call? On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:15 AM Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 14:24, Arnamoy Bhattacharyya via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I am working on porting a tool written for LLVM3.5 to LLVM10. There > > used to be a call instruction with the signature > > static CallInst * Create (Value *F, Value *Actual, const Twine > > &NameStr="", Instruction *InsertBefore=0) > > > > Can anyone please explain what it supposed to do? What was F and Actual?...

Hi LLVM Developers, I have a query about an LLVM error message that I'm encountering and I hope it's appropriate to post to this mailing list about it. Postgres can be built with LLVM-based JIT support. I find that when running on Linux (RHEL8) on IBM Z hardware, using LLVM8+, I'm seeing many instances of the following LLVM error message appearing in the Postgres server log: ORC

...st a "we'll get to this" but an actual plan :)   Does anyone feel passionately that any of the above points need to be addressed in the code before we can merge? Does anyone feel there is anything missing from that list? Given Mehdi and Hans' query about why this needs to go into LLVM10. Unless anyone has any good reason, perhaps we could postpone until after the branch, perhaps by one week to January 20th? That would give us some more time to bottom out what changes need to be made before we can accept the code and give us time to make any changes that block inclusion (assuming t...

Hi All, The general initializer support patch has landed (see 85fb997659b plus follow up fixes). Some quick background: Until now ORC, like MCJIT, has handled static initializer discovery by searching for llvm.global_ctors and llvm.global_dtors arrays in the IR added to the JIT. This approach suffers from several drawbacks: 1) It provides no built-in support for other program representations:

Hello LLVM-Mailing-List and hello Lang (I figured somebody would add you....so I did it directly. Sorry), I'm still playing around with the ORC JIT version which is available in LLVM 10. My goal is to get the address of every defined symbol in a module and an object file before the code is emitted. With the help of Lang I do this now with the lookup function of the Execution Session. Thank

Hello everyone, It took a bit longer than planned, but Release Candidate 3 is now here. It was tagged as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3 on the release branch at 3a843031a5 and contains 95 commits since the previous release candidate. If no new problems arise, this is what the final release will look like. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/10.0.0/#rc3 and

Hi, Using master at b0a1c0b72c9c61f8b0a223e08f43498abb64f5e8, I cannot build LLVM. I configured with: CC=clang CXX=clang++ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/opt/llvm11-git \ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \ -DLLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON \ -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON \ -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF \ -DLLVM_ENABLE_EH=ON \ -DLLVM_ENABLE_RTTI=ON \

Hello everyone, It took a bit longer than planned due to master being a somewhat unstable at the branch point, but Release Candidate 1 has now been tagged as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/10.0.0/#rc1 Pre-built binaries will be added there as they become available. Please file bug reports for any issues you find as blockers of