search for: llubenchmark

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 23 matches for "llubenchmark".

2003 Jan 13
0
[LLVMdev] X86 JIT status
...e not implemented yet (cast ulong -> fp type, f.e.) but they are apparently not frequently used. :) That said, here is the status of programs: Regression/Jello: All work SingleSource: All work MultiSource: Working: health, perimeter, power, treeadd, bisort, voronoi, tsp, em3d : pi, llubenchmark, etc... __iob : bh, anagram, fhourstones, burg, sgefa, sim, 181.mcf, ... other : mst The __iob problems are because of explicit references to stdin,out,err in the .c code. The problem is that the headers we're using turns them into references to an __iob array, which doesn't exist o...
2011 Jul 24
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
...5494 152.2079 0.1508 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet.compile 4.49% 46.0510 48.1199 0.0419 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city.compile 4.44% 2.2055 2.3035 0.0105 > External/SPEC/CFP2006/450_soplex/450_soplex.compile 3.85% 31.6364 32.8541 0.0750 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/llubenchmark/llu.exec 1.99% 3.5675 3.6385 0.0213 > External/SPEC/CFP2000/177_mesa/177_mesa.compile 1.42% 14.8597 15.0713 0.0313 > > Performance Improvements Δ Previous Current σ > External/SPEC/CINT2006/400_perlbench/400_perlbench.exec -2.54% 9.5618 9.3186 0.0943 > > > > ______________...
2011 Jul 24
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
...1508 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet.compile 4.49% 46.0510 48.1199 0.0419 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city.compile 4.44% 2.2055 2.3035 0.0105 >> External/SPEC/CFP2006/450_soplex/450_soplex.compile 3.85% 31.6364 32.8541 0.0750 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/llubenchmark/llu.exec 1.99% 3.5675 3.6385 0.0213 >> External/SPEC/CFP2000/177_mesa/177_mesa.compile 1.42% 14.8597 15.0713 0.0313 >> >> Performance Improvements Δ Previous Current σ >> External/SPEC/CINT2006/400_perlbench/400_perlbench.exec -2.54% 9.5618 9.3186 0.0943 >> >&gt...
2015 Feb 26
5
[LLVMdev] [RFC] AArch64: Should we disable GlobalMerge?
Hi all, I've started looking at the GlobalMerge pass, enabled by default on ARM and AArch64. I think we should reconsider that, at least for AArch64. As is, the pass just merges all globals together, in groups of 4KB (AArch64, 128B on ARM). At the time it was enabled, the general thinking was "it's almost free, it doesn't affect performance much, we might as well use it".
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/treeadd/treeadd | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/health/health | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bh/bh | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/llubenchmark/llu | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/sim/sim | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4 | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/NPB-serial/is/is...
2013 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] IR Passes and TargetTransformInfo: Straw Man
...5.0033 -0.6907365872054 Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDa 2.3246 2.3089 -0.6753850124752 Applications/sgefa/sgefa 0.0962 0.0956 -0.6237006237006 Applications/minisat/minisat 4.021 4.0023 -0.4650584431733 Benchmarks/llubenchmark/llu 2.8277 2.8147 -0.4597375959260 Benchmarks/TSVC/Expansion-flt/Expansion-flt 1.8036 1.7961 -0.4158349966733 Applications/aha/aha 1.1345 1.1299 -0.4054649625385 Benchmarks/TSVC/Expansion-dbl/Expansion-dbl 2.5986 2.5886...
2011 Apr 30
2
[LLVMdev] Greedy register allocation
...ngleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20 -14.3% SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build2 -10.3% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs -10.2% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ReedSolomon -9.8% MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod -9.7% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo -9.1% MultiSource/Benchmarks/llubenchmark/llu -9.1% MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/analyzer/analyzer -8.9% MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes -8.8% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/sieve -8.6% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/security-rijndael -7.9% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel-2 -6.2% MultiSourc...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
....65 2.49 * 3.11 | 0.71 0.76 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2 | 0.1291 24252 0.1433 * 0.1381 | 24.09 33.88 26.33 * 26.41 | 0.71 0.91 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/llubenchmark/llu | 0.0173 4508 0.0258 * 0.0252 | 12.06 12.21 12.07 * 12.11 | 0.99 1.00 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/adpcm/rawcaudio/rawcaudio | 0.0158 2924 0.0117 * 0....
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
....98 3.43 * 4.00 | 0.95 0.83 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2 | 0.1160 23112 0.1760 * 0.1640 | 26.71 27.72 25.78 * 29.65 | 0.96 1.04 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/llubenchmark/llu | 0.0240 4156 0.0240 * 0.0240 | 20.16 19.38 19.70 * 18.68 | 1.04 1.02 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/adpcm/rawcaudio/rawcaudio | 0.0200 2888 0.0160 * 0....
2013 Jul 18
3
[LLVMdev] IR Passes and TargetTransformInfo: Straw Man
Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got chance to list a detailed pass order for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations. This is wish-list in our mind: pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or just inline tiny func), get rid of all loop xforms... post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
....05 2.50 * 2.97 | 0.92 0.76 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2 | 0.0955 23112 0.1339 * 0.1290 | 25.26 26.01 24.97 * 25.12 | 0.97 1.01 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/llubenchmark/llu | 0.0194 4148 0.0253 * 0.0159 | 6.78 7.04 7.01 * 7.03 | 0.96 0.97 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/adpcm/rawcaudio/rawcaudio | 0.0159 2900 0.0102 * 0....
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
....22 1.95 * 2.08 | 0.89 0.55 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2 | 0.0514 24984 0.0647 * 0.1107 | 29.15 31.05 30.33 * 31.97 | 0.94 0.96 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/llubenchmark/llu | 0.0078 4696 0.0136 * 0.0133 | 9.80 9.75 10.58 * 10.64 | 1.01 0.93 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/adpcm/rawcaudio/rawcaudio | 0.0067 3028 0.0060 * 0....
2018 Apr 26
0
Compare test-suite benchmarks performance complied without TBAA, with default TBAA and with new TBAA struct path
...3391009910|0.802206556| 1.05| 3324663069| 2|0.800454835| 1.28| 3324663069| 2| |MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes.test | 40|1.457606778|11993065051|1.457628021| 0|11993065048| 0|1.458776986| -0.08|11993065048| 0| |MultiSource/Benchmarks/llubenchmark/llu.test | 40|5.202703599| 2493038287| 5.21286191| -0.19| 2493038293| 0|5.201113006| 0.03| 2493038289| 0| |MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign.test | 40|11.83656454|96495561521|11.63414059| 1.74|93867683605| 2.8...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...        2.35 | 1.05    1.08    n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes                          | > 0.0599 9740     0.0200      *                0.0200      |    2.87    2.91 >  2.77 *           2.76 | 0.99    1.04    n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/llubenchmark/llu                                  | > 0.0000 3896     0.0300      *                0.0300      |    6.10    6.30 >  6.24 *           6.31 | 0.97    0.98    n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign                              | > 3.7200 346176   1.9100      *  ...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...| 1.05 1.08 n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ > ecbdes | 0.0599 9740 0.0200 > * 0.0200 | 2.87 2.91 2.77 * > 2.76 | 0.99 1.04 n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/llubenchmark/ > llu | 0.0000 3896 0.0300 > * 0.0300 | 6.10 6.30 6.24 * > 6.31 | 0.97 0.98 n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/ > pairlocalalign | 3.7200 346176...
2011 Dec 01
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
...4.compile=on> > 1.92% 1.1281 1.1498 0.0017 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.MultiSource%2FBenchmarks%2FPtrdist%2Fbc%2Fbc.compile=on> > 1.92% 1.1546 1.1768 0.0015 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/llubenchmark/llu.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.MultiSource%2FBenchmarks%2Fllubenchmark%2Fllu.compile=on> > 1.91% 0.0523 0.0533 0.0002 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,